我们如何与年轻人建立联系?青少年心理健康定性研究中合作制作的评论和建议。

IF 2
Clinical child psychology and psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1177/13591045251364408
Sophie Dallison, Anastasia Slastikova, Hannah Peel, Grace Chamberlain, Lucy Biddle, Bonnie Teague, Maria Elizabeth Loades, Nina Higson-Sweeney
{"title":"我们如何与年轻人建立联系?青少年心理健康定性研究中合作制作的评论和建议。","authors":"Sophie Dallison, Anastasia Slastikova, Hannah Peel, Grace Chamberlain, Lucy Biddle, Bonnie Teague, Maria Elizabeth Loades, Nina Higson-Sweeney","doi":"10.1177/13591045251364408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young people (YP) have long been underserved in mental health research. Co-production is part of a significant shift in youth mental health research from tokenistic involvement practices towards more genuine, meaningful collaboration with the group that the research affects: young people. This commentary reflects on learnings from a co-production process in the context of Can We Connect (CWC), a qualitative study on where YP seek mental health information online and their attitudes towards what is available. Young researchers were involved in planning, co-conducting the interviews, contributed to the data analysis and dissemination. Based on our shared experiences as a research team, we aim to provide insights into and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research. We (<i>n</i> = 12, including 4 young researchers, aged 16-18) reflected on our experiences of either being, or collaborating with, a young researcher in CWC. For us, having young researchers in a research team brings (1) value to YP and (2) value to research. (3) Capitalising on differences is important, (4) having structured support for young researchers and (5) balancing levels of involvement. Open, transparent and honest communication is key to building trust, enabling young researchers to be meaningfully involved members of research teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":93938,"journal":{"name":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"811-821"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can we connect with young people? A commentary and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Dallison, Anastasia Slastikova, Hannah Peel, Grace Chamberlain, Lucy Biddle, Bonnie Teague, Maria Elizabeth Loades, Nina Higson-Sweeney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591045251364408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Young people (YP) have long been underserved in mental health research. Co-production is part of a significant shift in youth mental health research from tokenistic involvement practices towards more genuine, meaningful collaboration with the group that the research affects: young people. This commentary reflects on learnings from a co-production process in the context of Can We Connect (CWC), a qualitative study on where YP seek mental health information online and their attitudes towards what is available. Young researchers were involved in planning, co-conducting the interviews, contributed to the data analysis and dissemination. Based on our shared experiences as a research team, we aim to provide insights into and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research. We (<i>n</i> = 12, including 4 young researchers, aged 16-18) reflected on our experiences of either being, or collaborating with, a young researcher in CWC. For us, having young researchers in a research team brings (1) value to YP and (2) value to research. (3) Capitalising on differences is important, (4) having structured support for young researchers and (5) balancing levels of involvement. Open, transparent and honest communication is key to building trust, enabling young researchers to be meaningfully involved members of research teams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"811-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251364408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251364408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,青少年在心理健康研究中一直得不到充分的服务。合作制作是青年心理健康研究从象征性的参与实践向与研究影响的群体(年轻人)进行更真实、更有意义的合作的重大转变的一部分。这篇评论反映了在“我们可以联系”(CWC)的背景下从合作制作过程中吸取的教训,这是一项关于青少年在哪里寻求在线心理健康信息以及他们对现有信息的态度的定性研究。青年研究人员参与了计划,共同进行了访谈,并对数据分析和传播作出了贡献。基于我们作为一个研究团队的共同经验,我们的目标是在定性的青少年心理健康研究中提供见解和合作生产的建议。我们(n = 12,包括4名16-18岁的年轻研究人员)反思了我们作为CWC年轻研究人员或与之合作的经历。对于我们来说,在一个研究团队中拥有年轻的研究人员可以带来(1)YP的价值,(2)研究的价值。(3)利用差异很重要;(4)为年轻研究人员提供结构化支持;(5)平衡参与水平。开放、透明和诚实的沟通是建立信任的关键,它使年轻科学家能够有意意地参与到研究团队中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How can we connect with young people? A commentary and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research.

How can we connect with young people? A commentary and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research.

How can we connect with young people? A commentary and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research.

Young people (YP) have long been underserved in mental health research. Co-production is part of a significant shift in youth mental health research from tokenistic involvement practices towards more genuine, meaningful collaboration with the group that the research affects: young people. This commentary reflects on learnings from a co-production process in the context of Can We Connect (CWC), a qualitative study on where YP seek mental health information online and their attitudes towards what is available. Young researchers were involved in planning, co-conducting the interviews, contributed to the data analysis and dissemination. Based on our shared experiences as a research team, we aim to provide insights into and recommendations for co-production within qualitative youth mental health research. We (n = 12, including 4 young researchers, aged 16-18) reflected on our experiences of either being, or collaborating with, a young researcher in CWC. For us, having young researchers in a research team brings (1) value to YP and (2) value to research. (3) Capitalising on differences is important, (4) having structured support for young researchers and (5) balancing levels of involvement. Open, transparent and honest communication is key to building trust, enabling young researchers to be meaningfully involved members of research teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信