混合主动方法对血压控制学习、学生认知和考试引起的压力和焦虑的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1152/advan.00093.2025
Fernanda Klein Marcondes, Lais Tono Cardozo, Patricia Oliveira Lima, Karina Reche Casale, Maria Antonia Ramos de Azevedo
{"title":"混合主动方法对血压控制学习、学生认知和考试引起的压力和焦虑的影响。","authors":"Fernanda Klein Marcondes, Lais Tono Cardozo, Patricia Oliveira Lima, Karina Reche Casale, Maria Antonia Ramos de Azevedo","doi":"10.1152/advan.00093.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze the effect of blended active method (BAM) on blood pressure (BP) control learning, pretest stress and anxiety, and students' perceptions. With approval from the institutional ethics committee, two freshman Dentistry classes were assigned to either a traditional method (TM; <i>n</i> = 50) or BAM (<i>n</i> = 49) group. All students completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and provided saliva samples for cortisol and alpha-amylase measurements at baseline and before the exam. The TM group attended two lectures on BP control. In BAM, <i>class 1</i> involved team discussions of clinical scenarios involving BP alterations. Before <i>class 2</i>, students watched pre-class videos with embedded questions (Edpuzzle) and completed an interactive online lesson (Lt-Kuracloud) with exercises and immediate feedback. In <i>class 2</i>, students took an individual test and, in teams, analyzed which BP control systems were activated in the previous scenarios, explaining the physiological responses involved. In <i>class 3</i>, both groups completed the STAI, performed saliva collection, and a summative exam on BP control. Test scores were compared using <i>t</i> tests; anxiety and biomarker stress levels were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. BAM students achieved significantly higher exam scores (8.75 ± 1.17) compared to TM (7.27 ± 1.82). Before the exam, the TM group showed higher alpha-amylase, cortisol, and anxiety levels than BAM. According to student perceptions, BAM strategies effectively supported BP control learning. Overall, BAM improved learning outcomes and helped reduce pretest stress and anxiety compared to traditional teaching.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study demonstrates that a blended active method (BAM), combining team discussions, interactive online lessons, and formative assessments, improves learning outcomes and reduces pretest stress and anxiety in university students studying blood pressure control. Unlike traditional lectures, BAM provided immediate feedback and opportunities for collaborative problem-solving. The study also measured physiological stress markers (cortisol and alpha-amylase), confirming BAM's effectiveness in promoting both cognitive performance and emotional well-being in a higher education health sciences setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"862-870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of blended active methodology on learning about blood pressure control, students' perception, and test-induced stress and anxiety.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Klein Marcondes, Lais Tono Cardozo, Patricia Oliveira Lima, Karina Reche Casale, Maria Antonia Ramos de Azevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00093.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze the effect of blended active method (BAM) on blood pressure (BP) control learning, pretest stress and anxiety, and students' perceptions. With approval from the institutional ethics committee, two freshman Dentistry classes were assigned to either a traditional method (TM; <i>n</i> = 50) or BAM (<i>n</i> = 49) group. All students completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and provided saliva samples for cortisol and alpha-amylase measurements at baseline and before the exam. The TM group attended two lectures on BP control. In BAM, <i>class 1</i> involved team discussions of clinical scenarios involving BP alterations. Before <i>class 2</i>, students watched pre-class videos with embedded questions (Edpuzzle) and completed an interactive online lesson (Lt-Kuracloud) with exercises and immediate feedback. In <i>class 2</i>, students took an individual test and, in teams, analyzed which BP control systems were activated in the previous scenarios, explaining the physiological responses involved. In <i>class 3</i>, both groups completed the STAI, performed saliva collection, and a summative exam on BP control. Test scores were compared using <i>t</i> tests; anxiety and biomarker stress levels were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. BAM students achieved significantly higher exam scores (8.75 ± 1.17) compared to TM (7.27 ± 1.82). Before the exam, the TM group showed higher alpha-amylase, cortisol, and anxiety levels than BAM. According to student perceptions, BAM strategies effectively supported BP control learning. Overall, BAM improved learning outcomes and helped reduce pretest stress and anxiety compared to traditional teaching.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study demonstrates that a blended active method (BAM), combining team discussions, interactive online lessons, and formative assessments, improves learning outcomes and reduces pretest stress and anxiety in university students studying blood pressure control. Unlike traditional lectures, BAM provided immediate feedback and opportunities for collaborative problem-solving. The study also measured physiological stress markers (cortisol and alpha-amylase), confirming BAM's effectiveness in promoting both cognitive performance and emotional well-being in a higher education health sciences setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"862-870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00093.2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00093.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析混合主动法(BAM)对血压控制学习、考试前压力和焦虑以及学生认知的影响。经机构伦理委员会批准,将两个牙科新生班分为传统方法组(TM, n = 50)和BAM组(n = 49)。所有学生都完成了状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI),并在基线和考试前提供了皮质醇和α -淀粉酶的唾液样本。TM组参加了两次关于BP控制的讲座。在BAM中,第一堂课涉及到团队讨论涉及血压改变的临床场景。在第2节课前,学生们观看了带有嵌入式问题的课前视频(Edpuzzle),并完成了带有练习和即时反馈的在线互动课程(Lt-Kuracloud)。在第二班,学生们参加了一个单独的测试,并以小组为单位,分析了哪些BP控制系统在之前的场景中被激活,并解释了所涉及的生理反应。在第3班,两组均完成了STAI、唾液采集和血压控制总结性检查。测试成绩采用t检验进行比较;焦虑和生物标志物应激水平采用双因素方差分析。BAM学生的考试成绩(8.75±1.17)明显高于TM学生(7.27±1.82)。在考试前,TM组的α -淀粉酶、皮质醇和焦虑水平高于BAM。根据学生的感知,BAM策略有效地支持BP控制学习。总体而言,与传统教学相比,BAM改善了学习成果,并有助于减少考试前的压力和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of blended active methodology on learning about blood pressure control, students' perception, and test-induced stress and anxiety.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of blended active method (BAM) on blood pressure (BP) control learning, pretest stress and anxiety, and students' perceptions. With approval from the institutional ethics committee, two freshman Dentistry classes were assigned to either a traditional method (TM; n = 50) or BAM (n = 49) group. All students completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and provided saliva samples for cortisol and alpha-amylase measurements at baseline and before the exam. The TM group attended two lectures on BP control. In BAM, class 1 involved team discussions of clinical scenarios involving BP alterations. Before class 2, students watched pre-class videos with embedded questions (Edpuzzle) and completed an interactive online lesson (Lt-Kuracloud) with exercises and immediate feedback. In class 2, students took an individual test and, in teams, analyzed which BP control systems were activated in the previous scenarios, explaining the physiological responses involved. In class 3, both groups completed the STAI, performed saliva collection, and a summative exam on BP control. Test scores were compared using t tests; anxiety and biomarker stress levels were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. BAM students achieved significantly higher exam scores (8.75 ± 1.17) compared to TM (7.27 ± 1.82). Before the exam, the TM group showed higher alpha-amylase, cortisol, and anxiety levels than BAM. According to student perceptions, BAM strategies effectively supported BP control learning. Overall, BAM improved learning outcomes and helped reduce pretest stress and anxiety compared to traditional teaching.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates that a blended active method (BAM), combining team discussions, interactive online lessons, and formative assessments, improves learning outcomes and reduces pretest stress and anxiety in university students studying blood pressure control. Unlike traditional lectures, BAM provided immediate feedback and opportunities for collaborative problem-solving. The study also measured physiological stress markers (cortisol and alpha-amylase), confirming BAM's effectiveness in promoting both cognitive performance and emotional well-being in a higher education health sciences setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信