使用计算机眼手协调任务检测有脑震荡史的成人慢性认知运动缺陷:初步实验设计研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Qin Zhu, Shaochen Huang
{"title":"使用计算机眼手协调任务检测有脑震荡史的成人慢性认知运动缺陷:初步实验设计研究。","authors":"Qin Zhu, Shaochen Huang","doi":"10.2196/70867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concussion has been a major public health concern due to the substantial cognitive sequelae it results. Although the dysfunctions of the frontal lobe and corpus callosum owing to concussions have been documented, the existing concussion screening tools merely examine cognitive functions in isolation of motor functions and failed to detect the chronic cognitive-motor impairments following concussions. Yet, there has been no concussion screening test aimed specifically to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence for using computerized eye-hand coordination tasks to detect chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with concussion history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The computerized eye-hand coordination tasks were used to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions of the participants with and with no history of concussion. In experiment 1, a total of 12 participants (6 young adults with a history of concussion and 6 healthy controls) completed longitudinal assessments of coordination profiles across a year. Experiment 2 examined a total of 20 participants (10 participants with a history of concussion and 10 healthy controls) using an iterated single-session protocol. Just noticeable difference (JND) and proportion of time-on-task (PTT) were used to assess cognitive-motor performance. Mixed-design ANOVAs were used to examine group differences, and the effect sizes were assessed using Cohen d test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In experiment 1, participants with a history of concussion exhibited more inconsistent ability to visually discriminate the in-phase coordination pattern (coefficient of variation of JND: participants with a history of concussion = mean 0.27, SD 0.04, and healthy controls = mean 0.17, SD 0.07; t10=2.93; P=.02). Similarly, their performance on unimanual and bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns was significantly poorer (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.63, SD 0.10, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.73, SD 0.08 [F1,10=8.49; P=.02]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.46, SD 0.14, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67; P=.008]). In experiment, 2 where only the unimanual coordination tasks were implemented for screening, participants with a history of concussion showed impaired performance in both in-phase and anti-phase tasks (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.62, SD 0.13, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.74, SD 0.07 [F1,54=4.20; P=.045]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26; P=.002]), and they also failed to show the differentiated performance between anti-phase and 90° coordination patterns (PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTT90° coordination=mean 0.37, SD 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to their ability to detect both impaired and undifferentiated performance in producing intrinsic and novel coordination patterns, the unimanual coordination tasks appear to be a sensitive screening tool for chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with history of concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e70867"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.\",\"authors\":\"Qin Zhu, Shaochen Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/70867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concussion has been a major public health concern due to the substantial cognitive sequelae it results. Although the dysfunctions of the frontal lobe and corpus callosum owing to concussions have been documented, the existing concussion screening tools merely examine cognitive functions in isolation of motor functions and failed to detect the chronic cognitive-motor impairments following concussions. Yet, there has been no concussion screening test aimed specifically to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence for using computerized eye-hand coordination tasks to detect chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with concussion history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The computerized eye-hand coordination tasks were used to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions of the participants with and with no history of concussion. In experiment 1, a total of 12 participants (6 young adults with a history of concussion and 6 healthy controls) completed longitudinal assessments of coordination profiles across a year. Experiment 2 examined a total of 20 participants (10 participants with a history of concussion and 10 healthy controls) using an iterated single-session protocol. Just noticeable difference (JND) and proportion of time-on-task (PTT) were used to assess cognitive-motor performance. Mixed-design ANOVAs were used to examine group differences, and the effect sizes were assessed using Cohen d test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In experiment 1, participants with a history of concussion exhibited more inconsistent ability to visually discriminate the in-phase coordination pattern (coefficient of variation of JND: participants with a history of concussion = mean 0.27, SD 0.04, and healthy controls = mean 0.17, SD 0.07; t10=2.93; P=.02). Similarly, their performance on unimanual and bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns was significantly poorer (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.63, SD 0.10, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.73, SD 0.08 [F1,10=8.49; P=.02]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.46, SD 0.14, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67; P=.008]). In experiment, 2 where only the unimanual coordination tasks were implemented for screening, participants with a history of concussion showed impaired performance in both in-phase and anti-phase tasks (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.62, SD 0.13, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.74, SD 0.07 [F1,54=4.20; P=.045]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26; P=.002]), and they also failed to show the differentiated performance between anti-phase and 90° coordination patterns (PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTT90° coordination=mean 0.37, SD 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to their ability to detect both impaired and undifferentiated performance in producing intrinsic and novel coordination patterns, the unimanual coordination tasks appear to be a sensitive screening tool for chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with history of concussion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactive Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e70867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12324898/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactive Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/70867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑震荡是一个主要的公共卫生问题,因为它导致大量的认知后遗症。虽然有文献记载脑震荡导致的额叶和胼胝体功能障碍,但现有的脑震荡筛查工具仅仅是在分离运动功能的情况下检查认知功能,未能发现脑震荡后的慢性认知运动损伤。然而,目前还没有专门针对评估认知-运动耦合功能的脑震荡筛查测试。目的:本研究旨在为使用计算机化的手眼协调任务检测与脑震荡病史相关的慢性认知运动缺陷提供初步证据。方法:采用计算机眼-手协调任务评估有和无脑震荡史的参与者的认知-运动功能。在实验1中,共有12名参与者(6名有脑震荡病史的年轻人和6名健康对照者)完成了一年内协调性的纵向评估。实验二采用重复的单次实验方案对20名参与者(10名有脑震荡病史的参与者和10名健康对照者)进行了检查。仅显着差异(JND)和任务完成时间比例(PTT)用于评估认知运动表现。采用混合设计方差分析检验组间差异,效应量采用Cohen d检验。结果:在实验1中,有脑震荡史的被试表现出更不一致的相协调模式视觉识别能力(JND变异系数:有脑震荡史的被试=平均0.27,SD 0.04,健康对照组=平均0.17,SD 0.07;t10 = 2.93;P = .02点)。同样,它们在单手和双手的同相和反相协调模式上的表现也明显较差(同相:pttconsed =平均0.63,SD 0.10, PTTHealthy=平均0.73,SD 0.08;P = 02];反相:pttconsed =mean 0.46, SD 0.14, PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67;P = .008])。在实验2中,仅使用手动协调任务进行筛选,有脑震荡史的参与者在同相和反相任务中的表现都受到损害(在同相:pttconsed =平均0.62,SD 0.13, PTTHealthy=平均0.74,SD 0.07;P = .045];反相:pttconsed =mean 0.37, SD 0.15, PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26;P=.002]),而且它们也未能显示反相位和90°配位模式之间的差异性能(PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, PTT90°配位=mean 0.37, SD 0.13)。结论:由于它们能够检测出受损和未分化的表现,产生固有的和新的协调模式,单一的协调任务似乎是一个敏感的筛选工具,慢性认知运动障碍与脑震荡的历史相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Detection of Chronic Cognitive-Motor Deficits in Adults With a History of Concussion Using Computerized Eye-Hand Coordination Tasks: Preliminary Experimental Design Study.

Background: Concussion has been a major public health concern due to the substantial cognitive sequelae it results. Although the dysfunctions of the frontal lobe and corpus callosum owing to concussions have been documented, the existing concussion screening tools merely examine cognitive functions in isolation of motor functions and failed to detect the chronic cognitive-motor impairments following concussions. Yet, there has been no concussion screening test aimed specifically to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions.

Objective: This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence for using computerized eye-hand coordination tasks to detect chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with concussion history.

Methods: The computerized eye-hand coordination tasks were used to assess the coupled cognitive-motor functions of the participants with and with no history of concussion. In experiment 1, a total of 12 participants (6 young adults with a history of concussion and 6 healthy controls) completed longitudinal assessments of coordination profiles across a year. Experiment 2 examined a total of 20 participants (10 participants with a history of concussion and 10 healthy controls) using an iterated single-session protocol. Just noticeable difference (JND) and proportion of time-on-task (PTT) were used to assess cognitive-motor performance. Mixed-design ANOVAs were used to examine group differences, and the effect sizes were assessed using Cohen d test.

Results: In experiment 1, participants with a history of concussion exhibited more inconsistent ability to visually discriminate the in-phase coordination pattern (coefficient of variation of JND: participants with a history of concussion = mean 0.27, SD 0.04, and healthy controls = mean 0.17, SD 0.07; t10=2.93; P=.02). Similarly, their performance on unimanual and bimanual in-phase and anti-phase coordination patterns was significantly poorer (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.63, SD 0.10, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.73, SD 0.08 [F1,10=8.49; P=.02]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.46, SD 0.14, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.60, SD 0.10 [F1,10=10.67; P=.008]). In experiment, 2 where only the unimanual coordination tasks were implemented for screening, participants with a history of concussion showed impaired performance in both in-phase and anti-phase tasks (at in-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.62, SD 0.13, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.74, SD 0.07 [F1,54=4.20; P=.045]; at anti-phase: PTTConcussed=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTTHealthy=mean 0.56, SD 0.14 [F1,54=10.26; P=.002]), and they also failed to show the differentiated performance between anti-phase and 90° coordination patterns (PTTAnti-phase=mean 0.37, SD 0.15, and PTT90° coordination=mean 0.37, SD 0.13).

Conclusions: Due to their ability to detect both impaired and undifferentiated performance in producing intrinsic and novel coordination patterns, the unimanual coordination tasks appear to be a sensitive screening tool for chronic cognitive-motor deficits associated with history of concussion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信