Randall T Loder, Alyssa L Walker, Laurel C Blakemore
{"title":"人/马相互作用导致的截肢和撕脱伤。","authors":"Randall T Loder, Alyssa L Walker, Laurel C Blakemore","doi":"10.1177/10806032251361904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionAmputations and avulsion injuries due to horse-associated activity are rare, yet they can result in significant impairment. The purpose of this study was to further investigate such injuries using a national emergency department database.MethodsThe US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to identify horse-associated amputation and avulsion injuries occurring between 2000-2023. Demographic data of age, sex, and injury details were collected.ResultsThere were 34,091 emergency department visits for equine-associated injuries, with 120 (0.35%) due to amputations/avulsions; 53 (44%) patients sustained amputations, and 67 patients (56%) sustained avulsions. The average age was 37 (SD = 21 years). There were 78 female and 42 male patients. The most common mechanism of injury was riding the horse, with further details not specified (31%), followed by equipment issues (19%), bucked/thrown/kicked off the horse (15%), falling off the horse (11%), and others (6%). A rope/chain was involved in 29 patients (24%). There were 55 amputations involving the finger (40), thumb (13), and others (2). Rope-related injuries were more commonly involved in those sustaining amputations versus avulsions (42% vs 10%, <i>P</i> < .001). Males had more rope-associated injuries (36% vs 18%, <i>P</i> = .043).ConclusionsThis is the largest study to date of amputations and/or avulsions due to horse-associated injuries. There were multiple mechanisms of injury, with ropes involved in one-quarter. This baseline data can be useful for evaluating the effectiveness of future prevention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251361904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amputations and Avulsion Injuries due to Human/Equine Interaction.\",\"authors\":\"Randall T Loder, Alyssa L Walker, Laurel C Blakemore\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10806032251361904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionAmputations and avulsion injuries due to horse-associated activity are rare, yet they can result in significant impairment. The purpose of this study was to further investigate such injuries using a national emergency department database.MethodsThe US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to identify horse-associated amputation and avulsion injuries occurring between 2000-2023. Demographic data of age, sex, and injury details were collected.ResultsThere were 34,091 emergency department visits for equine-associated injuries, with 120 (0.35%) due to amputations/avulsions; 53 (44%) patients sustained amputations, and 67 patients (56%) sustained avulsions. The average age was 37 (SD = 21 years). There were 78 female and 42 male patients. The most common mechanism of injury was riding the horse, with further details not specified (31%), followed by equipment issues (19%), bucked/thrown/kicked off the horse (15%), falling off the horse (11%), and others (6%). A rope/chain was involved in 29 patients (24%). There were 55 amputations involving the finger (40), thumb (13), and others (2). Rope-related injuries were more commonly involved in those sustaining amputations versus avulsions (42% vs 10%, <i>P</i> < .001). Males had more rope-associated injuries (36% vs 18%, <i>P</i> = .043).ConclusionsThis is the largest study to date of amputations and/or avulsions due to horse-associated injuries. There were multiple mechanisms of injury, with ropes involved in one-quarter. This baseline data can be useful for evaluating the effectiveness of future prevention programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10806032251361904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251361904\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251361904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由马相关活动引起的截肢和撕脱伤是罕见的,但它们会导致严重的损伤。本研究的目的是利用国家急诊科数据库进一步调查这类损伤。方法使用美国国家电子伤害监测系统(NEISS)对2000-2023年间发生的马相关截肢和撕脱伤进行识别。收集了年龄、性别和损伤细节的人口统计数据。结果急诊马相关损伤34091例,其中截肢/撕脱伤120例(0.35%);53例(44%)截肢,67例(56%)撕脱。平均年龄37岁(SD = 21岁)。其中女性78例,男性42例。最常见的受伤机制是骑马,没有详细说明(31%),其次是设备问题(19%),被马蹬下/摔下/踢下马(15%),从马上摔下(11%),以及其他(6%)。29例(24%)患者使用了绳索/链条。55例截肢涉及手指(40例)、拇指(13例)和其他部位(2例)。与撕脱伤相比,绳索相关损伤在截肢患者中更为常见(42% vs 10%, P = 0.043)。这是迄今为止关于马相关损伤导致的截肢和/或撕脱伤的最大规模的研究。有多种损伤机制,其中四分之一涉及绳索。这些基线数据可用于评估未来预防方案的有效性。
Amputations and Avulsion Injuries due to Human/Equine Interaction.
IntroductionAmputations and avulsion injuries due to horse-associated activity are rare, yet they can result in significant impairment. The purpose of this study was to further investigate such injuries using a national emergency department database.MethodsThe US National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to identify horse-associated amputation and avulsion injuries occurring between 2000-2023. Demographic data of age, sex, and injury details were collected.ResultsThere were 34,091 emergency department visits for equine-associated injuries, with 120 (0.35%) due to amputations/avulsions; 53 (44%) patients sustained amputations, and 67 patients (56%) sustained avulsions. The average age was 37 (SD = 21 years). There were 78 female and 42 male patients. The most common mechanism of injury was riding the horse, with further details not specified (31%), followed by equipment issues (19%), bucked/thrown/kicked off the horse (15%), falling off the horse (11%), and others (6%). A rope/chain was involved in 29 patients (24%). There were 55 amputations involving the finger (40), thumb (13), and others (2). Rope-related injuries were more commonly involved in those sustaining amputations versus avulsions (42% vs 10%, P < .001). Males had more rope-associated injuries (36% vs 18%, P = .043).ConclusionsThis is the largest study to date of amputations and/or avulsions due to horse-associated injuries. There were multiple mechanisms of injury, with ropes involved in one-quarter. This baseline data can be useful for evaluating the effectiveness of future prevention programs.
期刊介绍:
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.