克赖顿跨专业协作评估(C-ICE)巴西版有效性的初步证据。

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240282.en
Nilton Orlando da Silva, Jorge Vinicius Cestari Felix, Radames Boostel, Jessica De Oliveira Veloso Vilarinho, Marcia Bucco, Juliana Olle Mendes
{"title":"克赖顿跨专业协作评估(C-ICE)巴西版有效性的初步证据。","authors":"Nilton Orlando da Silva, Jorge Vinicius Cestari Felix, Radames Boostel, Jessica De Oliveira Veloso Vilarinho, Marcia Bucco, Juliana Olle Mendes","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240282.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present preliminary evidence of validity of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument translated and adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Methodological study conducted in six steps: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, and submission to the original authors. This study was based in southern Brazil, involving professionals from various health areas from different regions of the country. Data collection took place between 2023 and 2024, through in-person meetings and online questionnaires made available via Google Forms®. To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated and adapted version of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation was modified according to the experts' suggestions. Validity and reliability evidence were measured using the Content Validity Index and Cronbach's Alpha, respectively. The content validity index was 0.95, and reliability by Cronbach's alpha was 0.913, considered an excellent result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The translation and adaptation of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation - Brazil version, provide an instrument to evaluate interprofessional performance in the training process of health professionals in the Brazilian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"46 ","pages":"e20240282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary evidence of validity of the Brazilian version of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE).\",\"authors\":\"Nilton Orlando da Silva, Jorge Vinicius Cestari Felix, Radames Boostel, Jessica De Oliveira Veloso Vilarinho, Marcia Bucco, Juliana Olle Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240282.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present preliminary evidence of validity of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument translated and adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Methodological study conducted in six steps: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, and submission to the original authors. This study was based in southern Brazil, involving professionals from various health areas from different regions of the country. Data collection took place between 2023 and 2024, through in-person meetings and online questionnaires made available via Google Forms®. To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translated and adapted version of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation was modified according to the experts' suggestions. Validity and reliability evidence were measured using the Content Validity Index and Cronbach's Alpha, respectively. The content validity index was 0.95, and reliability by Cronbach's alpha was 0.913, considered an excellent result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The translation and adaptation of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation - Brazil version, provide an instrument to evaluate interprofessional performance in the training process of health professionals in the Brazilian context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"e20240282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240282.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240282.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为克赖顿跨专业协作评估(C-ICE)量表的有效性提供初步证据,该量表经翻译后适用于巴西葡萄牙语语境。方法:方法学研究分为翻译、综合、回译、专家评审、预测、提交原作者六步。这项研究以巴西南部为基地,涉及来自该国不同地区各个卫生领域的专业人员。数据收集在2023年至2024年期间进行,通过面对面的会议和通过谷歌Forms®提供的在线问卷。为了评估信度,计算Cronbach’s alpha系数。结果:根据专家建议,对《克赖顿跨专业协同评价》翻译改编版进行了修改。效度和信度证据分别使用内容效度指数和Cronbach's Alpha进行测量。内容效度指数为0.95,Cronbach's alpha信度为0.913,认为结果很好。结论:翻译和改编的Creighton跨专业协作评估-巴西版,为巴西卫生专业人员培训过程中的跨专业绩效评估提供了一种工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary evidence of validity of the Brazilian version of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE).

Objective: To present preliminary evidence of validity of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation (C-ICE) instrument translated and adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese context.

Method: Methodological study conducted in six steps: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, and submission to the original authors. This study was based in southern Brazil, involving professionals from various health areas from different regions of the country. Data collection took place between 2023 and 2024, through in-person meetings and online questionnaires made available via Google Forms®. To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated.

Results: The translated and adapted version of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation was modified according to the experts' suggestions. Validity and reliability evidence were measured using the Content Validity Index and Cronbach's Alpha, respectively. The content validity index was 0.95, and reliability by Cronbach's alpha was 0.913, considered an excellent result.

Conclusion: The translation and adaptation of the Creighton Interprofessional Collaborative Evaluation - Brazil version, provide an instrument to evaluate interprofessional performance in the training process of health professionals in the Brazilian context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信