[不同行业听力保护装置的保护作用及影响因素研究]。

Q3 Medicine
S B Su, X Zhong, Q F Huang, Q Y Ou, Y Y Zhang, Z P Li, X Luo, S M Chen, Z Y Huang
{"title":"[不同行业听力保护装置的保护作用及影响因素研究]。","authors":"S B Su, X Zhong, Q F Huang, Q Y Ou, Y Y Zhang, Z P Li, X Luo, S M Chen, Z Y Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240424-00186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the current situation of the protective effect of hearing protection device (HPD) worn by manufacturing workers and discuss their possible influencing factors. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 3634 noisy workers were surveyed and tested. The study conducted surveys of workers on the use of HPD. The 3M(TM) E-A-R Fit(TM) binaural verification system was used to measure the personal attenuation device (PAR) of workers wearing HPD. <b>Results:</b> The <i>M</i> (<i>Q</i>(1), <i>Q</i>(3)) of baseline PAR obtained by 3634 workers was 12 (2, 19) dB. There was a statistically significant difference in baseline PAR among the three types of HPDs (<i>H</i>=336.39, <i>P</i><0.01) . After pairwise comparison, it was found that the baseline PAR of workers wearing foam earplugs and earmuffs was higher than that of pre-molded earplugs (<i>P</i><0.01) . There were differences in baseline PAR among workers in different industries (<i>Z</i>=359.73, <i>P</i><0.01) . Education level, age of using HPD, types of HPDs, noise exposure intensity, with or without knowledge of correct methods, and comfort evaluation were the main factors affecting baseline PAR (<i>P</i><0.05) . There were 1536 workers (43.4%) failed the baseline PAR test. After the intervention, the median PAR increased significantly from 1 (0, 6) dB (baseline) to 18 (14, 22) dB (after the intervention) (<i>P</i><0.01) . The follow-up test found that the follow-up PAR of 328 workers was higher than the baseline PAR of the initial test, and the follow-up PAR was higher than the post-intervention PAR of the initial test (<i>P</i><0.01) . <b>Conclusion:</b> Under the conditions of this study, the protective effect of HPD was affected by factors such as incorrect understanding of wearing methods, exposure to high-intensity noise, low education level, a short period of time of HPD use and low comfort of hearing protectors. The protective effect could be improved through training, optimizing the wearing of hearing protector models, and follow-up interventions. Enterprises should use suitability verification to ensure the correct selection and wearing of noisy workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"43 7","pages":"508-512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Research on the protective effects and influencing factors of hearing protection device in different industries].\",\"authors\":\"S B Su, X Zhong, Q F Huang, Q Y Ou, Y Y Zhang, Z P Li, X Luo, S M Chen, Z Y Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240424-00186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the current situation of the protective effect of hearing protection device (HPD) worn by manufacturing workers and discuss their possible influencing factors. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 3634 noisy workers were surveyed and tested. The study conducted surveys of workers on the use of HPD. The 3M(TM) E-A-R Fit(TM) binaural verification system was used to measure the personal attenuation device (PAR) of workers wearing HPD. <b>Results:</b> The <i>M</i> (<i>Q</i>(1), <i>Q</i>(3)) of baseline PAR obtained by 3634 workers was 12 (2, 19) dB. There was a statistically significant difference in baseline PAR among the three types of HPDs (<i>H</i>=336.39, <i>P</i><0.01) . After pairwise comparison, it was found that the baseline PAR of workers wearing foam earplugs and earmuffs was higher than that of pre-molded earplugs (<i>P</i><0.01) . There were differences in baseline PAR among workers in different industries (<i>Z</i>=359.73, <i>P</i><0.01) . Education level, age of using HPD, types of HPDs, noise exposure intensity, with or without knowledge of correct methods, and comfort evaluation were the main factors affecting baseline PAR (<i>P</i><0.05) . There were 1536 workers (43.4%) failed the baseline PAR test. After the intervention, the median PAR increased significantly from 1 (0, 6) dB (baseline) to 18 (14, 22) dB (after the intervention) (<i>P</i><0.01) . The follow-up test found that the follow-up PAR of 328 workers was higher than the baseline PAR of the initial test, and the follow-up PAR was higher than the post-intervention PAR of the initial test (<i>P</i><0.01) . <b>Conclusion:</b> Under the conditions of this study, the protective effect of HPD was affected by factors such as incorrect understanding of wearing methods, exposure to high-intensity noise, low education level, a short period of time of HPD use and low comfort of hearing protectors. The protective effect could be improved through training, optimizing the wearing of hearing protector models, and follow-up interventions. Enterprises should use suitability verification to ensure the correct selection and wearing of noisy workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志\",\"volume\":\"43 7\",\"pages\":\"508-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240424-00186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240424-00186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价制造业工人佩戴听力保护装置(HPD)保护效果的现状,并探讨其可能的影响因素。方法:对3634名噪声工人进行调查和测试。该研究对工人使用HPD的情况进行了调查。使用3M(TM) E-A-R Fit(TM)双耳验证系统测量佩戴HPD工人的个人衰减装置(PAR)。结果:3634名工人获得的基线PAR的M (Q(1), Q(3))为12 (2,19)dB。三种类型HPD的基线PAR (H=336.39, PPZ=359.73, ppppp)差异有统计学意义。结论:本研究条件下,HPD的保护效果受对佩戴方法认识不正确、暴露于高强度噪声、受教育程度低、使用HPD时间短、听力保护器舒适度低等因素的影响。可通过培训、优化听力保护器型号配戴、随访干预等措施提高保护效果。企业应采用适用性验证,确保噪声工人的正确选择和佩戴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Research on the protective effects and influencing factors of hearing protection device in different industries].

Objective: To evaluate the current situation of the protective effect of hearing protection device (HPD) worn by manufacturing workers and discuss their possible influencing factors. Methods: A total of 3634 noisy workers were surveyed and tested. The study conducted surveys of workers on the use of HPD. The 3M(TM) E-A-R Fit(TM) binaural verification system was used to measure the personal attenuation device (PAR) of workers wearing HPD. Results: The M (Q(1), Q(3)) of baseline PAR obtained by 3634 workers was 12 (2, 19) dB. There was a statistically significant difference in baseline PAR among the three types of HPDs (H=336.39, P<0.01) . After pairwise comparison, it was found that the baseline PAR of workers wearing foam earplugs and earmuffs was higher than that of pre-molded earplugs (P<0.01) . There were differences in baseline PAR among workers in different industries (Z=359.73, P<0.01) . Education level, age of using HPD, types of HPDs, noise exposure intensity, with or without knowledge of correct methods, and comfort evaluation were the main factors affecting baseline PAR (P<0.05) . There were 1536 workers (43.4%) failed the baseline PAR test. After the intervention, the median PAR increased significantly from 1 (0, 6) dB (baseline) to 18 (14, 22) dB (after the intervention) (P<0.01) . The follow-up test found that the follow-up PAR of 328 workers was higher than the baseline PAR of the initial test, and the follow-up PAR was higher than the post-intervention PAR of the initial test (P<0.01) . Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, the protective effect of HPD was affected by factors such as incorrect understanding of wearing methods, exposure to high-intensity noise, low education level, a short period of time of HPD use and low comfort of hearing protectors. The protective effect could be improved through training, optimizing the wearing of hearing protector models, and follow-up interventions. Enterprises should use suitability verification to ensure the correct selection and wearing of noisy workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信