[掩膜间隙对粒子屏障防护影响的数值研究]。

Q3 Medicine
Y Jiang, Q Tang, C Xu
{"title":"[掩膜间隙对粒子屏障防护影响的数值研究]。","authors":"Y Jiang, Q Tang, C Xu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240528-00238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The present study investigated the impact of gaps between the mask and human face on particle barrier protection. It revealed the inhalation and deposition patterns of 1-10 μm particles for masks with and without gaps, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for enhancing particle personal protection. <b>Methods:</b> The headand N95 maskmodels were established in August 2023 using three-dimensional modeling technology. The Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation method was employed to simulate inhalation airflow and particle deposition pattern. A MATLAB code was programed to generate randomly distributed particles on the spherical breathing zone, and their trajectories were tracked until deposition on the mask, face, chest, inhalation into the nasal cavity, or escape from the computational domain. Then the inhalation and deposition fractions of micrometer-sized particles were quantified, and the impact of mask gap on particle barrier protection was analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The high-velocity airflow region formed at the leakage site when the mask gap was present. At a nasal inhalation flow rate of 15 L/min, the proportion of inhalation flow through the gap reached 81%. Under sealed mask conditions, 71%-87% of 1-10 μm particles were intercepted within the mask, whereas this retention dropped to 42%-4% in the presence of gap. Without a mask, it was predicted that 93%-52% of particles in the 1-10 μm size range were inhaled through the nose. With a leaky mask, the inhalation fraction decreased to 34%-19%, showing a downward trend with increasing particle size. When the mask was well-fitted and properly sealed, the inhalation fraction dropped to below 1%. Moreover, the surface deposition of 1-10 μm particles on the face and upper chest reached 5%-35% when wearing mask with gap, which was dramatically higher than the 1%-20% under sealed conditions. It was also observed that particle deposition on the human face was concentrated around the eyes. <b>Conclusion:</b> The gaps between the mask and face significantly altered inhalation airflow dynamics, particle trajectories, and deposition pattern, substantially reducing the protective efficacy of masks. To ensure optimal protection in particulate-exposure environments, masks should be worn with a tight seal. Furthermore, facial hygiene is recommended to remove deposited particles and reduce the risk of respiratory injury or infectious disease transmission via inhalation or surface contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":23958,"journal":{"name":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","volume":"43 7","pages":"481-488"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Numerical study on the impact of mask gap on particle barrier protection].\",\"authors\":\"Y Jiang, Q Tang, C Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240528-00238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The present study investigated the impact of gaps between the mask and human face on particle barrier protection. It revealed the inhalation and deposition patterns of 1-10 μm particles for masks with and without gaps, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for enhancing particle personal protection. <b>Methods:</b> The headand N95 maskmodels were established in August 2023 using three-dimensional modeling technology. The Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation method was employed to simulate inhalation airflow and particle deposition pattern. A MATLAB code was programed to generate randomly distributed particles on the spherical breathing zone, and their trajectories were tracked until deposition on the mask, face, chest, inhalation into the nasal cavity, or escape from the computational domain. Then the inhalation and deposition fractions of micrometer-sized particles were quantified, and the impact of mask gap on particle barrier protection was analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The high-velocity airflow region formed at the leakage site when the mask gap was present. At a nasal inhalation flow rate of 15 L/min, the proportion of inhalation flow through the gap reached 81%. Under sealed mask conditions, 71%-87% of 1-10 μm particles were intercepted within the mask, whereas this retention dropped to 42%-4% in the presence of gap. Without a mask, it was predicted that 93%-52% of particles in the 1-10 μm size range were inhaled through the nose. With a leaky mask, the inhalation fraction decreased to 34%-19%, showing a downward trend with increasing particle size. When the mask was well-fitted and properly sealed, the inhalation fraction dropped to below 1%. Moreover, the surface deposition of 1-10 μm particles on the face and upper chest reached 5%-35% when wearing mask with gap, which was dramatically higher than the 1%-20% under sealed conditions. It was also observed that particle deposition on the human face was concentrated around the eyes. <b>Conclusion:</b> The gaps between the mask and face significantly altered inhalation airflow dynamics, particle trajectories, and deposition pattern, substantially reducing the protective efficacy of masks. To ensure optimal protection in particulate-exposure environments, masks should be worn with a tight seal. Furthermore, facial hygiene is recommended to remove deposited particles and reduce the risk of respiratory injury or infectious disease transmission via inhalation or surface contact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志\",\"volume\":\"43 7\",\"pages\":\"481-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240528-00238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华劳动卫生职业病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240528-00238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究口罩与人脸间隙对粒子屏障防护的影响。揭示了有间隙和无间隙口罩对1 ~ 10 μm颗粒的吸入和沉积规律,旨在为加强颗粒防护提供理论依据。方法:于2023年8月采用三维建模技术建立头部和N95口罩模型。采用欧拉-拉格朗日数值模拟方法模拟吸入气流和颗粒沉积模式。编写MATLAB代码,在球形呼吸区生成随机分布的粒子,并跟踪其轨迹,直至沉积在口罩、面部、胸部、吸入鼻腔或逃离计算域。然后对微米级颗粒的吸入和沉积组分进行了量化,分析了口罩间隙对颗粒屏障防护的影响。结果:当掩膜间隙存在时,在泄漏部位形成高速气流区。在鼻腔吸入流量为15 L/min时,通过间隙的吸入流量比例达到81%。在密封掩膜条件下,1-10 μm颗粒在掩膜内的截留率为71% ~ 87%,而在存在间隙的情况下,截留率降至42% ~ 4%。如果不戴口罩,1 ~ 10 μm大小的颗粒物中93% ~ 52%是通过鼻子吸入的。有泄漏面罩时,吸入分数下降至34% ~ 19%,且随粒径增大呈下降趋势。当口罩贴合和密封得当时,吸入分数降至1%以下。佩戴有间隙口罩时,1 ~ 10 μm颗粒在面部和上胸部的表面沉积达到5% ~ 35%,显著高于密闭条件下的1% ~ 20%。我们还观察到,人类脸上的颗粒沉积主要集中在眼睛周围。结论:口罩与面部之间的间隙明显改变了吸入气流动力学、颗粒轨迹和沉积模式,大大降低了口罩的防护效果。为确保在接触微粒的环境中获得最佳保护,应佩戴密封严密的口罩。此外,建议保持面部卫生,以清除沉积的颗粒,减少呼吸道损伤或通过吸入或表面接触传播传染病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Numerical study on the impact of mask gap on particle barrier protection].

Objective: The present study investigated the impact of gaps between the mask and human face on particle barrier protection. It revealed the inhalation and deposition patterns of 1-10 μm particles for masks with and without gaps, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for enhancing particle personal protection. Methods: The headand N95 maskmodels were established in August 2023 using three-dimensional modeling technology. The Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation method was employed to simulate inhalation airflow and particle deposition pattern. A MATLAB code was programed to generate randomly distributed particles on the spherical breathing zone, and their trajectories were tracked until deposition on the mask, face, chest, inhalation into the nasal cavity, or escape from the computational domain. Then the inhalation and deposition fractions of micrometer-sized particles were quantified, and the impact of mask gap on particle barrier protection was analyzed. Results: The high-velocity airflow region formed at the leakage site when the mask gap was present. At a nasal inhalation flow rate of 15 L/min, the proportion of inhalation flow through the gap reached 81%. Under sealed mask conditions, 71%-87% of 1-10 μm particles were intercepted within the mask, whereas this retention dropped to 42%-4% in the presence of gap. Without a mask, it was predicted that 93%-52% of particles in the 1-10 μm size range were inhaled through the nose. With a leaky mask, the inhalation fraction decreased to 34%-19%, showing a downward trend with increasing particle size. When the mask was well-fitted and properly sealed, the inhalation fraction dropped to below 1%. Moreover, the surface deposition of 1-10 μm particles on the face and upper chest reached 5%-35% when wearing mask with gap, which was dramatically higher than the 1%-20% under sealed conditions. It was also observed that particle deposition on the human face was concentrated around the eyes. Conclusion: The gaps between the mask and face significantly altered inhalation airflow dynamics, particle trajectories, and deposition pattern, substantially reducing the protective efficacy of masks. To ensure optimal protection in particulate-exposure environments, masks should be worn with a tight seal. Furthermore, facial hygiene is recommended to remove deposited particles and reduce the risk of respiratory injury or infectious disease transmission via inhalation or surface contact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9764
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信