经跖骨压力作为评估慢性肢体缺血严重程度的替代方法的验证。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Rumi Faizer, Bo Claymore, Sarah Dike, David Dvorak, Camille Graham, Yauhen Tarbunou, Sue Duval
{"title":"经跖骨压力作为评估慢性肢体缺血严重程度的替代方法的验证。","authors":"Rumi Faizer, Bo Claymore, Sarah Dike, David Dvorak, Camille Graham, Yauhen Tarbunou, Sue Duval","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251346133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionFew tests are validated for ischemia grading in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). An additional, easily accessible and validated technique would be beneficial. This study aimed to determine whether transmetatarsal pressure (TMP) is valid in the evaluation of CLTI ischemia grade. We also aimed to assess if values for TMP were meaningful in patients with noncompressible ankle-brachial indices (ABI).MethodsA cohort of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) presenting to our vascular center from March 1 to May 1, 2022, underwent TMP measurement concurrent with ABI and toe pressure (TP) measurement. Linear and quadratic regression models were used to assess the relation between TMP and TP or ABI.ResultsA total of 108 patients who were being followed for PAD underwent testing. Half had a history of CLTI (55% of patients with diabetes and 43% of patients without diabetes). The relation between TP and TMP was best described by a quadratic formula with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.41. By combining the existing WIfI ischemia ranges defined by TP and the quadratic formula, new ischemia grades were calculated for TMP. Ischemia grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 corresponded to ranges of TMP pressure (mmHg) of ≥ 75, 45-74, 30-44, and < 30. There were 25 instances where a patient had an abnormally elevated ABI. None of these patients had a noncompressible TP or TMP.ConclusionWe demonstrated that TMP can be integrated into the WIfI classification. We believe that TMP evaluation may increase the reliability, accuracy, and accessibility of CLTI assessment and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251346133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of transmetatarsal pressure as an alternative for evaluating severity of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.\",\"authors\":\"Rumi Faizer, Bo Claymore, Sarah Dike, David Dvorak, Camille Graham, Yauhen Tarbunou, Sue Duval\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X251346133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionFew tests are validated for ischemia grading in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). An additional, easily accessible and validated technique would be beneficial. This study aimed to determine whether transmetatarsal pressure (TMP) is valid in the evaluation of CLTI ischemia grade. We also aimed to assess if values for TMP were meaningful in patients with noncompressible ankle-brachial indices (ABI).MethodsA cohort of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) presenting to our vascular center from March 1 to May 1, 2022, underwent TMP measurement concurrent with ABI and toe pressure (TP) measurement. Linear and quadratic regression models were used to assess the relation between TMP and TP or ABI.ResultsA total of 108 patients who were being followed for PAD underwent testing. Half had a history of CLTI (55% of patients with diabetes and 43% of patients without diabetes). The relation between TP and TMP was best described by a quadratic formula with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> value of 0.41. By combining the existing WIfI ischemia ranges defined by TP and the quadratic formula, new ischemia grades were calculated for TMP. Ischemia grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 corresponded to ranges of TMP pressure (mmHg) of ≥ 75, 45-74, 30-44, and < 30. There were 25 instances where a patient had an abnormally elevated ABI. None of these patients had a noncompressible TP or TMP.ConclusionWe demonstrated that TMP can be integrated into the WIfI classification. We believe that TMP evaluation may increase the reliability, accuracy, and accessibility of CLTI assessment and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1358863X251346133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251346133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251346133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)中,很少有试验被证实为缺血分级。另外一种容易获得和验证的技术将是有益的。本研究旨在确定经跖骨压力(TMP)在评估CLTI缺血等级时是否有效。我们还旨在评估TMP值对不可压缩性踝肱指数(ABI)患者是否有意义。方法对2022年3月1日至5月1日就诊于我院血管中心的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者进行TMP测量,同时测量ABI和趾压(TP)。采用线性和二次回归模型评估TMP与TP或ABI之间的关系。结果共有108例PAD患者接受了检测。半数患者有CLTI病史(糖尿病患者占55%,非糖尿病患者占43%)。TP与TMP之间的关系最好用二次方程来描述,R2值为0.41。结合TP定义的现有WIfI缺血范围和二次公式,计算TMP新的缺血等级。缺血等级0、1、2和3分别对应于TMP压(mmHg)≥75、45-74、30-44和< 30。有25例患者的ABI异常升高。这些患者均无不可压缩性TP或TMP。结论TMP可纳入WIfI分类。我们认为TMP评估可以提高CLTI评估和管理的可靠性、准确性和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of transmetatarsal pressure as an alternative for evaluating severity of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

IntroductionFew tests are validated for ischemia grading in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). An additional, easily accessible and validated technique would be beneficial. This study aimed to determine whether transmetatarsal pressure (TMP) is valid in the evaluation of CLTI ischemia grade. We also aimed to assess if values for TMP were meaningful in patients with noncompressible ankle-brachial indices (ABI).MethodsA cohort of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) presenting to our vascular center from March 1 to May 1, 2022, underwent TMP measurement concurrent with ABI and toe pressure (TP) measurement. Linear and quadratic regression models were used to assess the relation between TMP and TP or ABI.ResultsA total of 108 patients who were being followed for PAD underwent testing. Half had a history of CLTI (55% of patients with diabetes and 43% of patients without diabetes). The relation between TP and TMP was best described by a quadratic formula with an R2 value of 0.41. By combining the existing WIfI ischemia ranges defined by TP and the quadratic formula, new ischemia grades were calculated for TMP. Ischemia grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 corresponded to ranges of TMP pressure (mmHg) of ≥ 75, 45-74, 30-44, and < 30. There were 25 instances where a patient had an abnormally elevated ABI. None of these patients had a noncompressible TP or TMP.ConclusionWe demonstrated that TMP can be integrated into the WIfI classification. We believe that TMP evaluation may increase the reliability, accuracy, and accessibility of CLTI assessment and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信