国家预警评分2-巴西版对脓毒症患者的预测性能。

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2025-08-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en
Alldren Silva de Sousa, Giovanna da Rosa Soares, Jaqueline Pereira da Costa, Cristiano Rossa da Rocha, Karina de Oliveira Azzolin, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Michelle Dornelles Santarem, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato
{"title":"国家预警评分2-巴西版对脓毒症患者的预测性能。","authors":"Alldren Silva de Sousa, Giovanna da Rosa Soares, Jaqueline Pereira da Costa, Cristiano Rossa da Rocha, Karina de Oliveira Azzolin, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Michelle Dornelles Santarem, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"46 ","pages":"e20240233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2- Brazilian Version for septic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alldren Silva de Sousa, Giovanna da Rosa Soares, Jaqueline Pereira da Costa, Cristiano Rossa da Rocha, Karina de Oliveira Azzolin, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Michelle Dornelles Santarem, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"e20240233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估国家早期预警评分2 -巴西版本的预测性能,与其他两种工具相比,用于临床恶化、重症监护病房入住和急诊服务疑似或确诊败血症患者的住院死亡率。方法:前瞻性队列研究于2021年10月至2022年2月在巴西南部一家公立医院对295名成年患者进行了研究。使用研究人员开发的特定仪器进行数据收集,在不同时间进行两次评估:紧急服务中的风险分类,以及患者最后一次转移到另一个服务。使用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性来评估预测性能,比较评估结果和时间点的得分。结果:对于临床恶化,国家早期预警评分2 -巴西版显示AUC为0.703,95% CI(0.63-0.77)。结论:国家早期预警评分2 -巴西版在评估阶段与其他评分相比具有更好的预测性能指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2- Brazilian Version for septic patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service.

Methods: Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points.

Results: For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment.

Conclusion: National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信