Alldren Silva de Sousa, Giovanna da Rosa Soares, Jaqueline Pereira da Costa, Cristiano Rossa da Rocha, Karina de Oliveira Azzolin, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Michelle Dornelles Santarem, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato
{"title":"国家预警评分2-巴西版对脓毒症患者的预测性能。","authors":"Alldren Silva de Sousa, Giovanna da Rosa Soares, Jaqueline Pereira da Costa, Cristiano Rossa da Rocha, Karina de Oliveira Azzolin, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Michelle Dornelles Santarem, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":"46 ","pages":"e20240233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2- Brazilian Version for septic patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alldren Silva de Sousa, Giovanna da Rosa Soares, Jaqueline Pereira da Costa, Cristiano Rossa da Rocha, Karina de Oliveira Azzolin, Janete de Souza Urbanetto, Michelle Dornelles Santarem, Rita Catalina Aquino Caregnato\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"e20240233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2025.20240233.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2- Brazilian Version for septic patients.
Objectives: To evaluate the predictive performance of the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version, as compared to two other instruments for clinical deterioration, Intensive Care Unit admission, and in-hospital mortality of patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis admitted to an Emergency Service.
Methods: Prospective cohort study conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 with 295 adult patients in a public hospital in southern Brazil. Data collection was performed using a specific instrument developed by the researchers, with two assessments at different times: at risk classification in emergency services, and as the patient was transferred to another service for the last time. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC, sensitivity, and specificity, comparing the scores across the evaluated outcomes and time points.
Results: For clinical deterioration, the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version showed an AUC of 0.703, 95% CI (0.63-0.77), p<0.001, and an AUC of 0.871, 95% CI (0.82-0.91), p<0.001 in the first and second assessments, respectively. For admission to the Intensive Care Unit, all three scores remained accurate only in the second assessment, with the National Early Warning Score 2 - Brazilian Version yielding the best results, AUC: 0.830, 95% CI (0.76-0.89), p<0.001 compared to the others. For in-hospital mortality, it presented an AUC of 0.770, 95% CI (0.70-0.83), p<0.001 in the second assessment.
Conclusion: National Early Warning Score 2 - Versão Brasileira showed better predictive performance metrics compared to the other scores in the evaluated stages.
期刊介绍:
A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.