传统、DEB和DSM:哪一种技术可用于中期HCC的姑息性TACE ?结果70例患者的疗效和耐受性。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Francesco Giurazza, Claudio Carrubba, Ernesto Punzi, Raffaella Tortora, Marco Guarracino, Fiorella Brangi, Federica Falaschi, Carla Migliaccio, Fabio Corvino, Giovanni Vennarecci, Giuseppe Giovanni Di Costanzo, Giulio Lombardi, Raffaella Niola
{"title":"传统、DEB和DSM:哪一种技术可用于中期HCC的姑息性TACE ?结果70例患者的疗效和耐受性。","authors":"Francesco Giurazza, Claudio Carrubba, Ernesto Punzi, Raffaella Tortora, Marco Guarracino, Fiorella Brangi, Federica Falaschi, Carla Migliaccio, Fabio Corvino, Giovanni Vennarecci, Giuseppe Giovanni Di Costanzo, Giulio Lombardi, Raffaella Niola","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02069-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare palliative cTACE, DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in patients affected by HCC in intermediate BCLC stage in terms of efficacy and patient tolerance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with palliative TACE were prospectively enrolled in two centers during 9 months. Procedures were performed superselectively in all patients. Inclusion criteria were: HCC diagnosis, intermediate BCLC stage, portal tree patency, preserved hepatic-renal-coagulation functions, palliative procedural aim, follow-up available up to 6-month post-TACE intervention. Exclusion criteria were: previous TACE treatments, alone or in combination with ablation in the same session, ascites, bilirubin > 2mg/dL, age < 18years, bridge to transplant procedural aim, concomitant infectious diseases. Primary endpoint was to compare efficacy and patients tolerance among the 3 different TACE techniques; secondary endpoint was to compare post-procedural complications occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were included and divided into three groups according to the TACE technique: 24 were treated with cTACE, 25 with DEB-TACE, 21 with DSM-TACE. According to mRECIST criteria at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, DEB-TACE presented better local response rates but without statistically significant differences. Patients treated with DSM-TACE showed significantly better tolerance, considering post-procedural transaminases and INR values together with clinical adverse events occurrence monitored up to 7 days. There were no differences in post-procedural complications and no major complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing palliative treatments, no significant differences emerged comparing cTACE, DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in terms of procedural efficacy; however, patients treated with DSM-TACE showed significant better procedural tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventional vs. DEB vs. DSM: Which technique for palliative TACE in intermediate-stage HCC? Results on 70 patients in terms of efficacy and tolerance.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Giurazza, Claudio Carrubba, Ernesto Punzi, Raffaella Tortora, Marco Guarracino, Fiorella Brangi, Federica Falaschi, Carla Migliaccio, Fabio Corvino, Giovanni Vennarecci, Giuseppe Giovanni Di Costanzo, Giulio Lombardi, Raffaella Niola\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-025-02069-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare palliative cTACE, DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in patients affected by HCC in intermediate BCLC stage in terms of efficacy and patient tolerance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with palliative TACE were prospectively enrolled in two centers during 9 months. Procedures were performed superselectively in all patients. Inclusion criteria were: HCC diagnosis, intermediate BCLC stage, portal tree patency, preserved hepatic-renal-coagulation functions, palliative procedural aim, follow-up available up to 6-month post-TACE intervention. Exclusion criteria were: previous TACE treatments, alone or in combination with ablation in the same session, ascites, bilirubin > 2mg/dL, age < 18years, bridge to transplant procedural aim, concomitant infectious diseases. Primary endpoint was to compare efficacy and patients tolerance among the 3 different TACE techniques; secondary endpoint was to compare post-procedural complications occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were included and divided into three groups according to the TACE technique: 24 were treated with cTACE, 25 with DEB-TACE, 21 with DSM-TACE. According to mRECIST criteria at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, DEB-TACE presented better local response rates but without statistically significant differences. Patients treated with DSM-TACE showed significantly better tolerance, considering post-procedural transaminases and INR values together with clinical adverse events occurrence monitored up to 7 days. There were no differences in post-procedural complications and no major complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing palliative treatments, no significant differences emerged comparing cTACE, DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in terms of procedural efficacy; however, patients treated with DSM-TACE showed significant better procedural tolerance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02069-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02069-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较姑息性cace、DEB-TACE和DSM-TACE在BCLC中期HCC患者中的疗效和患者耐受性。材料和方法:接受姑息性TACE治疗的患者在两个中心前瞻性入选,为期9个月。所有患者的手术都是超选择性的。纳入标准为:HCC诊断,BCLC中期分期,门静脉树通畅,保留肝肾凝血功能,姑息性手术目的,tace干预后随访至6个月。排除标准为:既往TACE治疗,单独或同期联合消融,腹水,胆红素bbb20 2mg/dL,年龄。结果:纳入70例患者,根据TACE技术分为三组:cTACE治疗24例,DEB-TACE治疗25例,DSM-TACE治疗21例。根据mRECIST随访1个月、3个月和6个月的标准,DEB-TACE具有更好的局部缓解率,但无统计学差异。考虑到术后转氨酶和INR值以及长达7天的临床不良事件发生监测,DSM-TACE治疗的患者耐受性明显更好。两组术后并发症无明显差异,无重大并发症发生。结论:在本研究中,在姑息治疗的中期HCC患者中,cTACE、DEB-TACE和DSM-TACE在程序疗效方面没有显著差异;然而,接受DSM-TACE治疗的患者表现出明显更好的程序耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conventional vs. DEB vs. DSM: Which technique for palliative TACE in intermediate-stage HCC? Results on 70 patients in terms of efficacy and tolerance.

Purpose: This study aims to compare palliative cTACE, DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in patients affected by HCC in intermediate BCLC stage in terms of efficacy and patient tolerance.

Materials and methods: Patients treated with palliative TACE were prospectively enrolled in two centers during 9 months. Procedures were performed superselectively in all patients. Inclusion criteria were: HCC diagnosis, intermediate BCLC stage, portal tree patency, preserved hepatic-renal-coagulation functions, palliative procedural aim, follow-up available up to 6-month post-TACE intervention. Exclusion criteria were: previous TACE treatments, alone or in combination with ablation in the same session, ascites, bilirubin > 2mg/dL, age < 18years, bridge to transplant procedural aim, concomitant infectious diseases. Primary endpoint was to compare efficacy and patients tolerance among the 3 different TACE techniques; secondary endpoint was to compare post-procedural complications occurrence.

Results: Seventy patients were included and divided into three groups according to the TACE technique: 24 were treated with cTACE, 25 with DEB-TACE, 21 with DSM-TACE. According to mRECIST criteria at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up, DEB-TACE presented better local response rates but without statistically significant differences. Patients treated with DSM-TACE showed significantly better tolerance, considering post-procedural transaminases and INR values together with clinical adverse events occurrence monitored up to 7 days. There were no differences in post-procedural complications and no major complications occurred.

Conclusions: In this study, in patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing palliative treatments, no significant differences emerged comparing cTACE, DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE in terms of procedural efficacy; however, patients treated with DSM-TACE showed significant better procedural tolerance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信