{"title":"“癌症灌木”萨瑟兰属植物(同属小瑟兰属植物)。一个促销研究的例子,还是有科学价值?","authors":"Nicezelle Gernandt, Frank van der Kooy","doi":"10.1055/a-2654-6280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Sutherlandia</i> (syn. <i>Lessertia</i>) <i>frutescens</i> is indigenous to the drier regions of southern Africa. <i>Sutherlandia frutescens</i> has a long history of traditional medicinal use and is credited with antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer properties. It is a very popular phytomedicine and, as the common name implies, is used as a prophylaxis and treatment of cancer. The objective of this review was to collate all published scientific data on the genera <i>Sutherlandia</i> and <i>Lessertia</i> regarding their antiproliferative properties and critically evaluate the data against established guidelines. Despite its use as traditional medicine, the potential of <i>S. frutescens</i> as a cancer treatment remains highly questionable. While <i>in vitro</i> studies suggest some potential antiproliferative effects, many studies lack positive controls and selectivity studies or use excessively high dosages, well above established guidelines, translating into unrealistic clinical applications. Consequently, these studies often appear overly optimistic and biased. Very few well-designed studies are available, and most research fails to meet established guidelines for evaluating selective cytotoxicity. Given these limitations and the absence of rigorous <i>in vivo</i> studies and/or clinical trials, future research may first focus on identifying chemovars with acceptable bioactivity and/or investigating the possibility of the presence of prodrugs by simulated gastrointestinal tract studies. Based on available data, it must be concluded that <i>S. frutescens</i> does not exhibit acceptable levels of bioactivity/selectivity, and keeping in mind possible herb-drug interactions and the serious nature of cancer, which causes over 10 million deaths annually, <i>S. frutescens</i> should not currently be recommended for use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20127,"journal":{"name":"Planta medica","volume":" ","pages":"730-744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"Cancer Bush\\\" Sutherlandia (syn. Lessertia) frutescens. An Example of Promotional Research, or Is There Scientific Merit?\",\"authors\":\"Nicezelle Gernandt, Frank van der Kooy\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2654-6280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Sutherlandia</i> (syn. <i>Lessertia</i>) <i>frutescens</i> is indigenous to the drier regions of southern Africa. <i>Sutherlandia frutescens</i> has a long history of traditional medicinal use and is credited with antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer properties. It is a very popular phytomedicine and, as the common name implies, is used as a prophylaxis and treatment of cancer. The objective of this review was to collate all published scientific data on the genera <i>Sutherlandia</i> and <i>Lessertia</i> regarding their antiproliferative properties and critically evaluate the data against established guidelines. Despite its use as traditional medicine, the potential of <i>S. frutescens</i> as a cancer treatment remains highly questionable. While <i>in vitro</i> studies suggest some potential antiproliferative effects, many studies lack positive controls and selectivity studies or use excessively high dosages, well above established guidelines, translating into unrealistic clinical applications. Consequently, these studies often appear overly optimistic and biased. Very few well-designed studies are available, and most research fails to meet established guidelines for evaluating selective cytotoxicity. Given these limitations and the absence of rigorous <i>in vivo</i> studies and/or clinical trials, future research may first focus on identifying chemovars with acceptable bioactivity and/or investigating the possibility of the presence of prodrugs by simulated gastrointestinal tract studies. Based on available data, it must be concluded that <i>S. frutescens</i> does not exhibit acceptable levels of bioactivity/selectivity, and keeping in mind possible herb-drug interactions and the serious nature of cancer, which causes over 10 million deaths annually, <i>S. frutescens</i> should not currently be recommended for use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planta medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"730-744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planta medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2654-6280\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2654-6280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The "Cancer Bush" Sutherlandia (syn. Lessertia) frutescens. An Example of Promotional Research, or Is There Scientific Merit?
Sutherlandia (syn. Lessertia) frutescens is indigenous to the drier regions of southern Africa. Sutherlandia frutescens has a long history of traditional medicinal use and is credited with antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer properties. It is a very popular phytomedicine and, as the common name implies, is used as a prophylaxis and treatment of cancer. The objective of this review was to collate all published scientific data on the genera Sutherlandia and Lessertia regarding their antiproliferative properties and critically evaluate the data against established guidelines. Despite its use as traditional medicine, the potential of S. frutescens as a cancer treatment remains highly questionable. While in vitro studies suggest some potential antiproliferative effects, many studies lack positive controls and selectivity studies or use excessively high dosages, well above established guidelines, translating into unrealistic clinical applications. Consequently, these studies often appear overly optimistic and biased. Very few well-designed studies are available, and most research fails to meet established guidelines for evaluating selective cytotoxicity. Given these limitations and the absence of rigorous in vivo studies and/or clinical trials, future research may first focus on identifying chemovars with acceptable bioactivity and/or investigating the possibility of the presence of prodrugs by simulated gastrointestinal tract studies. Based on available data, it must be concluded that S. frutescens does not exhibit acceptable levels of bioactivity/selectivity, and keeping in mind possible herb-drug interactions and the serious nature of cancer, which causes over 10 million deaths annually, S. frutescens should not currently be recommended for use.
期刊介绍:
Planta Medica is one of the leading international journals in the field of natural products – including marine organisms, fungi as well as micro-organisms – and medicinal plants. Planta Medica accepts original research papers, reviews, minireviews and perspectives from researchers worldwide. The journal publishes 18 issues per year.
The following areas of medicinal plants and natural product research are covered:
-Biological and Pharmacological Activities
-Natural Product Chemistry & Analytical Studies
-Pharmacokinetic Investigations
-Formulation and Delivery Systems of Natural Products.
The journal explicitly encourages the submission of chemically characterized extracts.