Alberto Stefana, Buket Ünver, Eduard Vieta, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Eric A. Youngstrom
{"title":"治疗师对其患者的会话水平情绪过程的评估:会话中患者情感反应问卷-临床医生表格的验证。","authors":"Alberto Stefana, Buket Ünver, Eduard Vieta, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Eric A. Youngstrom","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The current study aimed to evaluate a therapist version of the <i>in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire</i> (SPARQ). The SPARQ was developed to assess a pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors experienced by a patient toward their therapist during a session. The SPARQ has existed only as a patient self-report measure and has demonstrated promise as a psychotherapy process measure. This study intended to validate a complementary clinician-report version of the questionnaire: the SPARQ-C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of licensed mental health clinicians (<i>N</i> = 151) completed the SPARQ-C along with other measures. Data analysis involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ-C were also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The SPARQ-C preserved the two-factor structure: positive affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.84) and negative affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.70), which correlated <i>r</i> = 0.26. CFA using the a priori model two-factor model based on the patient-report version provided the following fit indices: χ<sup>2</sup><sub>[19]</sub> = 26.01, CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI [0.00, 0.09]), and SRMR = 0.05. The SPARQ-C scales demonstrated convergent and criterion-related validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, session outcome, and demographic-clinical variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The SPARQ-C is a reliable measure suitable for both clinical and research purposes. It allows for a nuanced assessment of patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist from the clinician's perspective.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"81 11","pages":"1129-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapist's Assessment of Their Patient's Session-Level Emotional Processes: Validation of the In-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire–Clinician Form\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Stefana, Buket Ünver, Eduard Vieta, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Eric A. Youngstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current study aimed to evaluate a therapist version of the <i>in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire</i> (SPARQ). The SPARQ was developed to assess a pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors experienced by a patient toward their therapist during a session. The SPARQ has existed only as a patient self-report measure and has demonstrated promise as a psychotherapy process measure. This study intended to validate a complementary clinician-report version of the questionnaire: the SPARQ-C.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sample of licensed mental health clinicians (<i>N</i> = 151) completed the SPARQ-C along with other measures. Data analysis involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ-C were also evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The SPARQ-C preserved the two-factor structure: positive affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.84) and negative affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.70), which correlated <i>r</i> = 0.26. CFA using the a priori model two-factor model based on the patient-report version provided the following fit indices: χ<sup>2</sup><sub>[19]</sub> = 26.01, CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI [0.00, 0.09]), and SRMR = 0.05. The SPARQ-C scales demonstrated convergent and criterion-related validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, session outcome, and demographic-clinical variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The SPARQ-C is a reliable measure suitable for both clinical and research purposes. It allows for a nuanced assessment of patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist from the clinician's perspective.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"81 11\",\"pages\":\"1129-1142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.70023\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapist's Assessment of Their Patient's Session-Level Emotional Processes: Validation of the In-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire–Clinician Form
Background
The current study aimed to evaluate a therapist version of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ). The SPARQ was developed to assess a pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors experienced by a patient toward their therapist during a session. The SPARQ has existed only as a patient self-report measure and has demonstrated promise as a psychotherapy process measure. This study intended to validate a complementary clinician-report version of the questionnaire: the SPARQ-C.
Methods
A sample of licensed mental health clinicians (N = 151) completed the SPARQ-C along with other measures. Data analysis involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ-C were also evaluated.
Results
The SPARQ-C preserved the two-factor structure: positive affect (k = 4, ω total = 0.84) and negative affect (k = 4, ω total = 0.70), which correlated r = 0.26. CFA using the a priori model two-factor model based on the patient-report version provided the following fit indices: χ2[19] = 26.01, CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI [0.00, 0.09]), and SRMR = 0.05. The SPARQ-C scales demonstrated convergent and criterion-related validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, session outcome, and demographic-clinical variables.
Discussion
The SPARQ-C is a reliable measure suitable for both clinical and research purposes. It allows for a nuanced assessment of patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist from the clinician's perspective.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.