治疗师对其患者的会话水平情绪过程的评估:会话中患者情感反应问卷-临床医生表格的验证。

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alberto Stefana, Buket Ünver, Eduard Vieta, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Eric A. Youngstrom
{"title":"治疗师对其患者的会话水平情绪过程的评估:会话中患者情感反应问卷-临床医生表格的验证。","authors":"Alberto Stefana,&nbsp;Buket Ünver,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta,&nbsp;Paolo Fusar-Poli,&nbsp;Eric A. Youngstrom","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The current study aimed to evaluate a therapist version of the <i>in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire</i> (SPARQ). The SPARQ was developed to assess a pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors experienced by a patient toward their therapist during a session. The SPARQ has existed only as a patient self-report measure and has demonstrated promise as a psychotherapy process measure. This study intended to validate a complementary clinician-report version of the questionnaire: the SPARQ-C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of licensed mental health clinicians (<i>N</i> = 151) completed the SPARQ-C along with other measures. Data analysis involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ-C were also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The SPARQ-C preserved the two-factor structure: positive affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.84) and negative affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.70), which correlated <i>r</i> = 0.26. CFA using the a priori model two-factor model based on the patient-report version provided the following fit indices: χ<sup>2</sup><sub>[19]</sub> = 26.01, CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI [0.00, 0.09]), and SRMR = 0.05. The SPARQ-C scales demonstrated convergent and criterion-related validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, session outcome, and demographic-clinical variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The SPARQ-C is a reliable measure suitable for both clinical and research purposes. It allows for a nuanced assessment of patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist from the clinician's perspective.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"81 11","pages":"1129-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapist's Assessment of Their Patient's Session-Level Emotional Processes: Validation of the In-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire–Clinician Form\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Stefana,&nbsp;Buket Ünver,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta,&nbsp;Paolo Fusar-Poli,&nbsp;Eric A. Youngstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The current study aimed to evaluate a therapist version of the <i>in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire</i> (SPARQ). The SPARQ was developed to assess a pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors experienced by a patient toward their therapist during a session. The SPARQ has existed only as a patient self-report measure and has demonstrated promise as a psychotherapy process measure. This study intended to validate a complementary clinician-report version of the questionnaire: the SPARQ-C.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A sample of licensed mental health clinicians (<i>N</i> = 151) completed the SPARQ-C along with other measures. Data analysis involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ-C were also evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The SPARQ-C preserved the two-factor structure: positive affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.84) and negative affect (<i>k</i> = 4, <i>ω</i> total = 0.70), which correlated <i>r</i> = 0.26. CFA using the a priori model two-factor model based on the patient-report version provided the following fit indices: χ<sup>2</sup><sub>[19]</sub> = 26.01, CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI [0.00, 0.09]), and SRMR = 0.05. The SPARQ-C scales demonstrated convergent and criterion-related validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, session outcome, and demographic-clinical variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The SPARQ-C is a reliable measure suitable for both clinical and research purposes. It allows for a nuanced assessment of patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist from the clinician's perspective.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"81 11\",\"pages\":\"1129-1142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.70023\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估一种治疗师版本的患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)。开发SPARQ是为了评估患者在治疗过程中对治疗师的情绪、思想和行为模式。SPARQ仅作为一种患者自我报告测量而存在,并已被证明有望作为一种心理治疗过程测量。本研究旨在验证问卷的补充临床报告版本:SPARQ-C。方法:抽取151名有执照的心理健康临床医生,完成SPARQ-C和其他测试。数据分析包括探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析(CFA)。并对SPARQ-C的信度、收敛效度和标准相关效度进行了评价。结果:SPARQ-C保持了积极情绪(k = 4, ω total = 0.84)和消极情绪(k = 4, ω total = 0.70)的双因素结构,相关系数r = 0.26。CFA采用基于患者报告版的先验模型双因素模型,拟合指标为:χ2 [19] = 26.01, CFI = 0.98;= 0.97, TLI RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI[0.00, 0.09]),和SRMR = 0.05。SPARQ-C量表对治疗关系的其他要素、治疗结果和人口统计学-临床变量的测量显示出收敛和标准相关的效度。讨论:SPARQ-C是一种适用于临床和研究目的的可靠测量方法。它允许从临床医生的角度对患者对治疗师的会话级情感反应进行细致入微的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Therapist's Assessment of Their Patient's Session-Level Emotional Processes: Validation of the In-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire–Clinician Form

Therapist's Assessment of Their Patient's Session-Level Emotional Processes: Validation of the In-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire–Clinician Form

Background

The current study aimed to evaluate a therapist version of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ). The SPARQ was developed to assess a pattern of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors experienced by a patient toward their therapist during a session. The SPARQ has existed only as a patient self-report measure and has demonstrated promise as a psychotherapy process measure. This study intended to validate a complementary clinician-report version of the questionnaire: the SPARQ-C.

Methods

A sample of licensed mental health clinicians (N = 151) completed the SPARQ-C along with other measures. Data analysis involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability and convergent and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ-C were also evaluated.

Results

The SPARQ-C preserved the two-factor structure: positive affect (k = 4, ω total = 0.84) and negative affect (k = 4, ω total = 0.70), which correlated r = 0.26. CFA using the a priori model two-factor model based on the patient-report version provided the following fit indices: χ2[19] = 26.01, CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05 (90% CI [0.00, 0.09]), and SRMR = 0.05. The SPARQ-C scales demonstrated convergent and criterion-related validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, session outcome, and demographic-clinical variables.

Discussion

The SPARQ-C is a reliable measure suitable for both clinical and research purposes. It allows for a nuanced assessment of patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist from the clinician's perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信