上颈部和脊柱治疗后颈部和肢体运动控制结果的选择性改善:一项重复测量队列研究。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Ushani Ambalavanar, Rufeyda Wise, Heidi Haavik, Bernadette A Murphy
{"title":"上颈部和脊柱治疗后颈部和肢体运动控制结果的选择性改善:一项重复测量队列研究。","authors":"Ushani Ambalavanar, Rufeyda Wise, Heidi Haavik, Bernadette A Murphy","doi":"10.31083/JIN39548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensory feedback from the upper cervical regions is used by the central nervous system to stabilize the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) joint for leveled vision and to assess head position, which is used in sensorimotor integration (SMI) of neck and upper limb motor control. However, few studies have specifically investigated the impact of C0-C1 dysfunction and/or its rectification on SMI related outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of restricted C0-C1 mobility and musculoskeletal pain on neck and upper limb motor control, whether these motor control deficits persist without treatment, and whether motor control improves following treatment designed to improve C0-C1 mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two participants with restricted C0-C1 mobility attended three data collection sessions (baseline, control (2 to 5 days later), and post-treatment) at a private clinic. The One-to Zero (OTZ) system which treats the C0-C1 first followed by other spinal regions if clinically indicated, was administered twice weekly until participants reached 80% improvement from baseline symptoms. Shoulder range of motion, peak force and electromyography during maximal resisted scapular elevation (upper trapezius) and neck flexion (sternocleidomastoid), peak grip, and quadricep strength were measured before and after treatment. Repeated measures ANOVAs with pre-planned contrasts (e.g., control to baseline, and post-treatment to baseline) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neck and limb control impairments persisted without treatment, with no changes between the double baseline (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Shoulder abduction and extension, and peak force output of the sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, and quadriceps improved post-intervention (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective improvement in neck and limb motor control outcomes post-treatment suggests that increased corticospinal drive/motor neuron excitability from normalized afferent input may impact gross motor output first.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>ACTRN12625000627459. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=389394&isReview=true.</p>","PeriodicalId":16160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","volume":"24 7","pages":"39548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective Improvement in Neck and Limb Motor Control Outcomes Following Treatment of the Upper Neck and Spine: A Repeated Measures Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ushani Ambalavanar, Rufeyda Wise, Heidi Haavik, Bernadette A Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/JIN39548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensory feedback from the upper cervical regions is used by the central nervous system to stabilize the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) joint for leveled vision and to assess head position, which is used in sensorimotor integration (SMI) of neck and upper limb motor control. However, few studies have specifically investigated the impact of C0-C1 dysfunction and/or its rectification on SMI related outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of restricted C0-C1 mobility and musculoskeletal pain on neck and upper limb motor control, whether these motor control deficits persist without treatment, and whether motor control improves following treatment designed to improve C0-C1 mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two participants with restricted C0-C1 mobility attended three data collection sessions (baseline, control (2 to 5 days later), and post-treatment) at a private clinic. The One-to Zero (OTZ) system which treats the C0-C1 first followed by other spinal regions if clinically indicated, was administered twice weekly until participants reached 80% improvement from baseline symptoms. Shoulder range of motion, peak force and electromyography during maximal resisted scapular elevation (upper trapezius) and neck flexion (sternocleidomastoid), peak grip, and quadricep strength were measured before and after treatment. Repeated measures ANOVAs with pre-planned contrasts (e.g., control to baseline, and post-treatment to baseline) were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neck and limb control impairments persisted without treatment, with no changes between the double baseline (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Shoulder abduction and extension, and peak force output of the sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, and quadriceps improved post-intervention (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective improvement in neck and limb motor control outcomes post-treatment suggests that increased corticospinal drive/motor neuron excitability from normalized afferent input may impact gross motor output first.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>ACTRN12625000627459. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=389394&isReview=true.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of integrative neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"24 7\",\"pages\":\"39548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of integrative neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN39548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN39548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自上颈椎区域的感觉反馈被中枢神经系统用于稳定枕寰关节(C0-C1)以实现视力水平和评估头部位置,这在颈部和上肢运动控制的感觉运动整合(SMI)中被使用。然而,很少有研究专门研究C0-C1功能障碍和/或其纠正对SMI相关结果的影响。本研究旨在确定C0-C1活动受限和肌肉骨骼疼痛对颈部和上肢运动控制的影响,这些运动控制缺陷是否在未经治疗的情况下持续存在,以及运动控制是否在改善C0-C1活动的治疗后得到改善。方法:22名C0-C1活动受限的参与者在一家私人诊所参加了三次数据收集会议(基线、对照(2至5天后)和治疗后)。1 - 0 (OTZ)系统首先治疗C0-C1,然后在临床指征的情况下治疗其他脊柱区域,每周给药两次,直到参与者的基线症状改善80%。在治疗前后测量肩胛骨最大阻力抬高(上斜方肌)和颈部屈曲(胸锁乳突肌)时的肩关节活动度、峰值力和肌电图、峰值握力和股四头肌力量。采用预先计划的对照(例如,对照与基线对照,治疗后与基线对照)进行重复测量方差分析。结果:颈部和肢体控制功能障碍持续存在,未经治疗,双基线间无变化(p < 0.05)。干预后,胸锁乳突肌、上斜方肌和股四头肌的肩部外展和伸展以及峰值力输出均得到改善(均p < 0.05)。结论:治疗后颈部和肢体运动控制结果的选择性改善表明,规范化传入输入增加的皮质脊髓驱动/运动神经元兴奋性可能首先影响大运动输出。临床注册号:ACTRN12625000627459。https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=389394&isReview=true。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective Improvement in Neck and Limb Motor Control Outcomes Following Treatment of the Upper Neck and Spine: A Repeated Measures Cohort Study.

Background: Sensory feedback from the upper cervical regions is used by the central nervous system to stabilize the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) joint for leveled vision and to assess head position, which is used in sensorimotor integration (SMI) of neck and upper limb motor control. However, few studies have specifically investigated the impact of C0-C1 dysfunction and/or its rectification on SMI related outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of restricted C0-C1 mobility and musculoskeletal pain on neck and upper limb motor control, whether these motor control deficits persist without treatment, and whether motor control improves following treatment designed to improve C0-C1 mobility.

Methods: Twenty-two participants with restricted C0-C1 mobility attended three data collection sessions (baseline, control (2 to 5 days later), and post-treatment) at a private clinic. The One-to Zero (OTZ) system which treats the C0-C1 first followed by other spinal regions if clinically indicated, was administered twice weekly until participants reached 80% improvement from baseline symptoms. Shoulder range of motion, peak force and electromyography during maximal resisted scapular elevation (upper trapezius) and neck flexion (sternocleidomastoid), peak grip, and quadricep strength were measured before and after treatment. Repeated measures ANOVAs with pre-planned contrasts (e.g., control to baseline, and post-treatment to baseline) were conducted.

Results: Neck and limb control impairments persisted without treatment, with no changes between the double baseline (p > 0.05). Shoulder abduction and extension, and peak force output of the sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, and quadriceps improved post-intervention (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Selective improvement in neck and limb motor control outcomes post-treatment suggests that increased corticospinal drive/motor neuron excitability from normalized afferent input may impact gross motor output first.

Clinical registration number: ACTRN12625000627459. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=389394&isReview=true.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
173
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JIN is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal. JIN publishes leading-edge research at the interface of theoretical and experimental neuroscience, focusing across hierarchical levels of brain organization to better understand how diverse functions are integrated. We encourage submissions from scientists of all specialties that relate to brain functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信