更正“来自水产养殖的鲑鱼虱减少了大西洋鲑鱼的海洋生存”。

IF 3.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
{"title":"更正“来自水产养殖的鲑鱼虱减少了大西洋鲑鱼的海洋生存”。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gargan, P. G., Millane, M., Lennox, R. J., &amp; Vollset, K. W. (2025). Salmon lice from aquaculture reduce marine survival of Atlantic salmon. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i>, <i>94(</i>7), 1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70051</p><p>In the originally published version of this article, the data point for the River Erne was incorrectly reported in the data table (Table 1). Although this data point had been excluded from the original analysis due to the unavailability of accurate estimates of farmed salmon abundance (required to calculate sea lice infestation pressure), it was inadvertently included in the summary table with an infestation pressure value of zero.</p><p>We have now updated the table to reflect the correct infestation pressure estimate for River Erne, based on recently obtained data. The River Erne data point has also been included in the updated statistical analysis. This updated analysis shows that inclusion of this data point has no impact on the overall conclusions of the study. Minor changes to the effect size estimates were observed (originally 1.22 [C.I. 1.12–1.33] now corrected to 1.24 [C.I. 1.13–1.35]), now representing a marginal increase from 18 to 19.2% less returns in the control group, but all key findings regarding the relationship between salmon lice infestation pressure and marine survival of Atlantic salmon remain valid and statistically supported.</p><p>In the data table (Table 1), mobile lice level prior to release for Burrishoole release date of 28 April 2009 is incorrectly entered as 3.91 (a typo) but is 3.13. This has been corrected in the table.</p><p>In addition, the original forest plot (Figure 4) contained an error related to data labelling and effect size. This figure has now been corrected and replaced with an updated version that includes the River Erne data and accurately reflects the revised analysis.</p><p>These corrections do not alter the scientific conclusions of the article.</p><p>We apologize for the oversight and thank readers for their attention to detail and engagement with our work.</p><p><b>TABLE 1</b>. Numbers of treated and untreated salmon smolts by release location and release year, farm stocking status, mobile lice levels, estimated farm stock numbers and associated one-sea-winter (1SW) returns during the study period 2001–2019.\n </p><p><b>FIGURE 8</b>. Estimated effect of infestation pressure and treatment from glmer model using the plot_model function in sjPlot package in R. Treated fish are coloured blue while untreated controls are coloured red.</p>","PeriodicalId":14934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Ecology","volume":"94 9","pages":"1879-1883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2656.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to ‘Salmon lice from aquaculture reduce marine survival of Atlantic salmon’\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2656.70111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gargan, P. G., Millane, M., Lennox, R. J., &amp; Vollset, K. W. (2025). Salmon lice from aquaculture reduce marine survival of Atlantic salmon. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i>, <i>94(</i>7), 1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70051</p><p>In the originally published version of this article, the data point for the River Erne was incorrectly reported in the data table (Table 1). Although this data point had been excluded from the original analysis due to the unavailability of accurate estimates of farmed salmon abundance (required to calculate sea lice infestation pressure), it was inadvertently included in the summary table with an infestation pressure value of zero.</p><p>We have now updated the table to reflect the correct infestation pressure estimate for River Erne, based on recently obtained data. The River Erne data point has also been included in the updated statistical analysis. This updated analysis shows that inclusion of this data point has no impact on the overall conclusions of the study. Minor changes to the effect size estimates were observed (originally 1.22 [C.I. 1.12–1.33] now corrected to 1.24 [C.I. 1.13–1.35]), now representing a marginal increase from 18 to 19.2% less returns in the control group, but all key findings regarding the relationship between salmon lice infestation pressure and marine survival of Atlantic salmon remain valid and statistically supported.</p><p>In the data table (Table 1), mobile lice level prior to release for Burrishoole release date of 28 April 2009 is incorrectly entered as 3.91 (a typo) but is 3.13. This has been corrected in the table.</p><p>In addition, the original forest plot (Figure 4) contained an error related to data labelling and effect size. This figure has now been corrected and replaced with an updated version that includes the River Erne data and accurately reflects the revised analysis.</p><p>These corrections do not alter the scientific conclusions of the article.</p><p>We apologize for the oversight and thank readers for their attention to detail and engagement with our work.</p><p><b>TABLE 1</b>. Numbers of treated and untreated salmon smolts by release location and release year, farm stocking status, mobile lice levels, estimated farm stock numbers and associated one-sea-winter (1SW) returns during the study period 2001–2019.\\n </p><p><b>FIGURE 8</b>. Estimated effect of infestation pressure and treatment from glmer model using the plot_model function in sjPlot package in R. Treated fish are coloured blue while untreated controls are coloured red.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Ecology\",\"volume\":\"94 9\",\"pages\":\"1879-1883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2656.70111\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.70111\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.70111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Gargan, p.g, Millane, M., Lennox, R. J., & Vollset, K. W.(2025)。来自水产养殖的鲑鱼虱减少了大西洋鲑鱼的海洋生存。生态学报,2009(7),344 - 344。在本文最初发布的https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70051In版本中,Erne河的数据点在数据表中被错误地报告了(表1)。虽然由于无法获得养殖鲑鱼丰度的准确估计(计算海虱侵扰压力所需),该数据点已被排除在原始分析之外,但它无意中被纳入汇总表,侵扰压力值为零。我们现在已经更新了该表,以反映根据最近获得的数据对厄恩河虫害压力的正确估计。厄恩河的数据点也被包括在最新的统计分析中。这一最新分析表明,纳入这一数据点对研究的总体结论没有影响。观察到效应大小估计值的微小变化(最初为1.22 [C.I.])1.12-1.33]现在更正为1.24 [C.I.]1.13-1.35]),现在在对照组的回报率从18%减少到19.2%,但关于鲑鱼虱感染压力与大西洋鲑鱼海洋生存之间关系的所有关键发现仍然有效,并有统计支持。在数据表(表1)中,2009年4月28日Burrishoole发布日期发布前的移动电话水平错误地输入为3.91(一个错字),而是3.13。这已经在表格中更正了。此外,原始森林图(图4)包含与数据标记和效应大小相关的错误。这个数字现在已被更正,并被更新的版本所取代,其中包括厄恩河的数据,并准确地反映了修订后的分析。这些更正不会改变文章的科学结论。我们为疏忽道歉,并感谢读者对细节的关注和对我们工作的参与。表1。2001-2019年研究期间,按放生地点和放生年份、养殖场放养状况、流动虱子水平、估计养殖场种群数量和相关的单海冬(1SW)回报划分的经处理和未经处理的鲑鱼幼崽数量。图8。使用r中sjPlot软件包中的plot_model函数从glmer模型估计侵染压力和处理的效果。处理过的鱼用蓝色表示,而未处理的鱼用红色表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correction to ‘Salmon lice from aquaculture reduce marine survival of Atlantic salmon’

Correction to ‘Salmon lice from aquaculture reduce marine survival of Atlantic salmon’

Gargan, P. G., Millane, M., Lennox, R. J., & Vollset, K. W. (2025). Salmon lice from aquaculture reduce marine survival of Atlantic salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology, 94(7), 1346–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70051

In the originally published version of this article, the data point for the River Erne was incorrectly reported in the data table (Table 1). Although this data point had been excluded from the original analysis due to the unavailability of accurate estimates of farmed salmon abundance (required to calculate sea lice infestation pressure), it was inadvertently included in the summary table with an infestation pressure value of zero.

We have now updated the table to reflect the correct infestation pressure estimate for River Erne, based on recently obtained data. The River Erne data point has also been included in the updated statistical analysis. This updated analysis shows that inclusion of this data point has no impact on the overall conclusions of the study. Minor changes to the effect size estimates were observed (originally 1.22 [C.I. 1.12–1.33] now corrected to 1.24 [C.I. 1.13–1.35]), now representing a marginal increase from 18 to 19.2% less returns in the control group, but all key findings regarding the relationship between salmon lice infestation pressure and marine survival of Atlantic salmon remain valid and statistically supported.

In the data table (Table 1), mobile lice level prior to release for Burrishoole release date of 28 April 2009 is incorrectly entered as 3.91 (a typo) but is 3.13. This has been corrected in the table.

In addition, the original forest plot (Figure 4) contained an error related to data labelling and effect size. This figure has now been corrected and replaced with an updated version that includes the River Erne data and accurately reflects the revised analysis.

These corrections do not alter the scientific conclusions of the article.

We apologize for the oversight and thank readers for their attention to detail and engagement with our work.

TABLE 1. Numbers of treated and untreated salmon smolts by release location and release year, farm stocking status, mobile lice levels, estimated farm stock numbers and associated one-sea-winter (1SW) returns during the study period 2001–2019.

FIGURE 8. Estimated effect of infestation pressure and treatment from glmer model using the plot_model function in sjPlot package in R. Treated fish are coloured blue while untreated controls are coloured red.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Ecology
Journal of Animal Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
188
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Ecology publishes the best original research on all aspects of animal ecology, ranging from the molecular to the ecosystem level. These may be field, laboratory and theoretical studies utilising terrestrial, freshwater or marine systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信