PACIC:抑郁症状患者的激活和问题解决与年龄无关。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karoline Lukaschek, H Schillok, L Junker, C Jung-Sievers, P Falkai, P Henningsen, T Dreischulte, G Pitschel-Walz, H Krcmar, A Schneider, P Schoenweger, C Haas, V Brisnik, F Gökce, J Eder, L Pfeiffer, V von Schrottenberg, C Teusen, M Bühner, J Gensichen
{"title":"PACIC:抑郁症状患者的激活和问题解决与年龄无关。","authors":"Karoline Lukaschek, H Schillok, L Junker, C Jung-Sievers, P Falkai, P Henningsen, T Dreischulte, G Pitschel-Walz, H Krcmar, A Schneider, P Schoenweger, C Haas, V Brisnik, F Gökce, J Eder, L Pfeiffer, V von Schrottenberg, C Teusen, M Bühner, J Gensichen","doi":"10.1007/s00406-025-02061-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) assesses alignment of chronic care with the Chronic Care Model (CCM). We analysed PACIC subscales in patients with depressive symptoms to identify gaps in patient-centred care. A total of N = 2741 patients (59.5% women, mean age 45.3 ± 16.9) were assessed for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and socioeconomic data. PACIC data from 1210 patients (62.7% women, mean age 47.2 years ± 16.8) revealed low scores in subscales patient activation, goal setting, problem-solving, and follow-up. Patient activation and problem-solving were age-independent. Overall, the low PACIC scores highlight poor CCM alignment in German depression care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PACIC: patient activation and problem solving not related to age in patients with depressive symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Karoline Lukaschek, H Schillok, L Junker, C Jung-Sievers, P Falkai, P Henningsen, T Dreischulte, G Pitschel-Walz, H Krcmar, A Schneider, P Schoenweger, C Haas, V Brisnik, F Gökce, J Eder, L Pfeiffer, V von Schrottenberg, C Teusen, M Bühner, J Gensichen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00406-025-02061-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) assesses alignment of chronic care with the Chronic Care Model (CCM). We analysed PACIC subscales in patients with depressive symptoms to identify gaps in patient-centred care. A total of N = 2741 patients (59.5% women, mean age 45.3 ± 16.9) were assessed for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and socioeconomic data. PACIC data from 1210 patients (62.7% women, mean age 47.2 years ± 16.8) revealed low scores in subscales patient activation, goal setting, problem-solving, and follow-up. Patient activation and problem-solving were age-independent. Overall, the low PACIC scores highlight poor CCM alignment in German depression care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-025-02061-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-025-02061-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性疾病护理患者评估(PACIC)评估慢性护理与慢性护理模式(CCM)的一致性。我们分析了抑郁症状患者的PACIC亚量表,以确定以患者为中心的护理的差距。共2741例患者(59.5%为女性,平均年龄45.3±16.9岁)接受抑郁(PHQ-9)、焦虑(GAD-7)和社会经济数据评估。来自1210例患者(62.7%为女性,平均年龄47.2±16.8岁)的PACIC数据显示,患者激活、目标设定、问题解决和随访的亚量表得分较低。患者的激活和问题解决与年龄无关。总体而言,较低的PACIC分数突出了德国抑郁症护理中较差的CCM一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PACIC: patient activation and problem solving not related to age in patients with depressive symptoms.

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) assesses alignment of chronic care with the Chronic Care Model (CCM). We analysed PACIC subscales in patients with depressive symptoms to identify gaps in patient-centred care. A total of N = 2741 patients (59.5% women, mean age 45.3 ± 16.9) were assessed for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7) and socioeconomic data. PACIC data from 1210 patients (62.7% women, mean age 47.2 years ± 16.8) revealed low scores in subscales patient activation, goal setting, problem-solving, and follow-up. Patient activation and problem-solving were age-independent. Overall, the low PACIC scores highlight poor CCM alignment in German depression care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信