使用光滑体颧骨植入体和角度基台的四颧技术的生物力学行为-体外研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.4103/ams.ams_161_24
Clifford Alejandro Pedro Pablo Allen Lengua, Denia Jhovana Vanessa Sierra Delgado, Henry Alexander Aldana Avila, Erton Massamitsu Miyasawa, Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan
{"title":"使用光滑体颧骨植入体和角度基台的四颧技术的生物力学行为-体外研究。","authors":"Clifford Alejandro Pedro Pablo Allen Lengua, Denia Jhovana Vanessa Sierra Delgado, Henry Alexander Aldana Avila, Erton Massamitsu Miyasawa, Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan","doi":"10.4103/ams.ams_161_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The quad zygoma technique is an alternative for patients who do not have enough bone to place zygomatic implants associated with conventional implants. The association of the quad zygoma technique with smooth zygomatic implants and angled abutments is an option, and understanding the mechanical behaviour of this combination is essential. This study aims to analyse the reliability of this technique by investigating the biomechanical behaviour of the rehabilitation of a total edentulous maxilla using the quad zygoma technique with 3.5 mm and 3.75 mm smooth body zygomatic implant diameters associated with 52° and 60° abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The finite element analysis (FEA) method was used to evaluate biomechanical behaviour. Three-dimensional models of maxillae, zygomatic bone, zygomatic implant, abutment, screw and the superstructure were used to assemble three models with different implant diameters and mini conical abutment angulations. The amount and distribution of stress in surrounding bone tissue, implant, abutment and abutment screws were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peak stresses in the bone, implant, abutment and abutment screw were below the resistance limits of the materials. Higher stress was found in the system (implant, abutment and abutment screw) associated with the 60° MiniConical Abutment. Similar stress patterns were found in the two placement approaches (sinus slot and exteriorised).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present FEA revealed that the quad zygoma technique is biomechanically suitable and reliable regardless of the implant diameter, abutment angulation and implant placement protocol. In addition, this study can help clinicians understand stress distribution and give them more confidence in using the evaluated implant system and quad zygoma approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7972,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Behaviour of Quad Zygoma Technique Using a Smooth Body Zygomatic Implant and Angled Abutments - An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Clifford Alejandro Pedro Pablo Allen Lengua, Denia Jhovana Vanessa Sierra Delgado, Henry Alexander Aldana Avila, Erton Massamitsu Miyasawa, Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ams.ams_161_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The quad zygoma technique is an alternative for patients who do not have enough bone to place zygomatic implants associated with conventional implants. The association of the quad zygoma technique with smooth zygomatic implants and angled abutments is an option, and understanding the mechanical behaviour of this combination is essential. This study aims to analyse the reliability of this technique by investigating the biomechanical behaviour of the rehabilitation of a total edentulous maxilla using the quad zygoma technique with 3.5 mm and 3.75 mm smooth body zygomatic implant diameters associated with 52° and 60° abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The finite element analysis (FEA) method was used to evaluate biomechanical behaviour. Three-dimensional models of maxillae, zygomatic bone, zygomatic implant, abutment, screw and the superstructure were used to assemble three models with different implant diameters and mini conical abutment angulations. The amount and distribution of stress in surrounding bone tissue, implant, abutment and abutment screws were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peak stresses in the bone, implant, abutment and abutment screw were below the resistance limits of the materials. Higher stress was found in the system (implant, abutment and abutment screw) associated with the 60° MiniConical Abutment. Similar stress patterns were found in the two placement approaches (sinus slot and exteriorised).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present FEA revealed that the quad zygoma technique is biomechanically suitable and reliable regardless of the implant diameter, abutment angulation and implant placement protocol. In addition, this study can help clinicians understand stress distribution and give them more confidence in using the evaluated implant system and quad zygoma approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"89-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_161_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_161_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:对于那些没有足够的骨来放置常规颧骨植入物的患者,四头颧骨技术是一种替代方法。将四颧骨技术与平滑颧骨植入物和有角度的基台结合是一种选择,了解这种组合的机械行为是必不可少的。本研究旨在通过研究采用直径为3.5 mm和3.75 mm的光滑体颧种植体与52°和60°基牙相结合的四颧技术修复全无牙上颌的生物力学行为,来分析该技术的可靠性。材料和方法:采用有限元分析(FEA)方法评价生物力学行为。采用上颌骨、颧骨、颧骨种植体、基台、螺钉和上部结构的三维模型,组装3个不同种植体直径和小圆锥形基台角度的模型。评估周围骨组织、种植体、基台和基台螺钉的应力大小和分布。结果:骨、种植体、基牙和基牙螺钉的峰值应力均低于材料的阻力极限。在与60°迷你基牙相关的系统(种植体、基牙和基牙螺钉)中发现较高的应力。在两种置入方式(窦槽和外置)中发现相似的应力模式。讨论:目前的有限元分析显示,无论种植体直径,基台角度和种植体放置方案如何,四颧技术在生物力学上是合适和可靠的。此外,本研究可以帮助临床医生了解应力分布,并使他们更有信心使用评估的植入系统和四头颧骨入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical Behaviour of Quad Zygoma Technique Using a Smooth Body Zygomatic Implant and Angled Abutments - An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.

Biomechanical Behaviour of Quad Zygoma Technique Using a Smooth Body Zygomatic Implant and Angled Abutments - An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.

Biomechanical Behaviour of Quad Zygoma Technique Using a Smooth Body Zygomatic Implant and Angled Abutments - An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.

Biomechanical Behaviour of Quad Zygoma Technique Using a Smooth Body Zygomatic Implant and Angled Abutments - An In Vitro Study.

Introduction: The quad zygoma technique is an alternative for patients who do not have enough bone to place zygomatic implants associated with conventional implants. The association of the quad zygoma technique with smooth zygomatic implants and angled abutments is an option, and understanding the mechanical behaviour of this combination is essential. This study aims to analyse the reliability of this technique by investigating the biomechanical behaviour of the rehabilitation of a total edentulous maxilla using the quad zygoma technique with 3.5 mm and 3.75 mm smooth body zygomatic implant diameters associated with 52° and 60° abutments.

Materials and methods: The finite element analysis (FEA) method was used to evaluate biomechanical behaviour. Three-dimensional models of maxillae, zygomatic bone, zygomatic implant, abutment, screw and the superstructure were used to assemble three models with different implant diameters and mini conical abutment angulations. The amount and distribution of stress in surrounding bone tissue, implant, abutment and abutment screws were evaluated.

Results: The peak stresses in the bone, implant, abutment and abutment screw were below the resistance limits of the materials. Higher stress was found in the system (implant, abutment and abutment screw) associated with the 60° MiniConical Abutment. Similar stress patterns were found in the two placement approaches (sinus slot and exteriorised).

Discussion: The present FEA revealed that the quad zygoma technique is biomechanically suitable and reliable regardless of the implant diameter, abutment angulation and implant placement protocol. In addition, this study can help clinicians understand stress distribution and give them more confidence in using the evaluated implant system and quad zygoma approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信