上颌切除术后即刻手术闭孔的三种固定技术的比较研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.4103/ams.ams_156_24
R Mahesh Kumar, S Varsha, Shrusti Chougule, D Divya, Yash Vipulkumar Vyas, Chinta Chetana Hota
{"title":"上颌切除术后即刻手术闭孔的三种固定技术的比较研究。","authors":"R Mahesh Kumar, S Varsha, Shrusti Chougule, D Divya, Yash Vipulkumar Vyas, Chinta Chetana Hota","doi":"10.4103/ams.ams_156_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional surgical obturators are widely used despite advancements in microvascular surgery for maxillary pathologies requiring resection due to poor surgical outcome/prognosis or financial constraints. This study was conducted to compare and evaluate three different techniques of fixation of immediate surgical obturators in maxillectomy cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprises 56 maxillectomy cases performed over 33 months from January 2021 to August 2023 in Tumkur with a minimal follow-up of 3 months. The different techniques of fixation of immediate surgical obturators are compared and evaluated for duration of fabrication, intraoperative fixation, stability, post-operative function, tissue healing and biocompatibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peak incidence was noted in the fourth and fifth decades of life. Both genders were almost equally involved in the study. The need for maxillectomy included - infective cystic pathology, odontogenic infections, mucormycosis, sinus pathologies and T1 maxillary carcinoma. The mean duration of hospitalisation was 5.3 days. The screw-based technique was superior in most of the criteria compared, followed by clasp-based technique and the material-based technique, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on the results of the study, the screw-based fixation technique offers an edge over the other two fixation techniques in terms of being trouble free for the surgeon, easy to fabricate, biocompatible and better patient quality of life. It can also be used in edentulous patients with extensive surgeries or extraoral support.</p>","PeriodicalId":7972,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"25-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Fixation Techniques of Immediate Surgical Obturators Following Maxillectomy - A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"R Mahesh Kumar, S Varsha, Shrusti Chougule, D Divya, Yash Vipulkumar Vyas, Chinta Chetana Hota\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ams.ams_156_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional surgical obturators are widely used despite advancements in microvascular surgery for maxillary pathologies requiring resection due to poor surgical outcome/prognosis or financial constraints. This study was conducted to compare and evaluate three different techniques of fixation of immediate surgical obturators in maxillectomy cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprises 56 maxillectomy cases performed over 33 months from January 2021 to August 2023 in Tumkur with a minimal follow-up of 3 months. The different techniques of fixation of immediate surgical obturators are compared and evaluated for duration of fabrication, intraoperative fixation, stability, post-operative function, tissue healing and biocompatibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peak incidence was noted in the fourth and fifth decades of life. Both genders were almost equally involved in the study. The need for maxillectomy included - infective cystic pathology, odontogenic infections, mucormycosis, sinus pathologies and T1 maxillary carcinoma. The mean duration of hospitalisation was 5.3 days. The screw-based technique was superior in most of the criteria compared, followed by clasp-based technique and the material-based technique, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on the results of the study, the screw-based fixation technique offers an edge over the other two fixation techniques in terms of being trouble free for the surgeon, easy to fabricate, biocompatible and better patient quality of life. It can also be used in edentulous patients with extensive surgeries or extraoral support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"25-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_156_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_156_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:尽管微血管手术在治疗由于手术预后差或资金限制而需要切除的上颌病变方面取得了进展,但传统的手术闭孔器仍被广泛使用。本研究比较和评估上颌切除术病例中即刻手术闭孔固定的三种不同技术。材料和方法:该研究包括56例上颌切除术病例,于2021年1月至2023年8月在Tumkur进行了33个月的手术,随访时间最短为3个月。对即刻手术闭孔的不同固定技术进行了比较和评估,包括制作时间、术中固定、稳定性、术后功能、组织愈合和生物相容性。结果:发病率高峰出现在40岁和50岁。参与这项研究的男女人数几乎相等。上颌切除术的需要包括感染性囊性病变、牙源性感染、毛霉菌病、窦性病变和T1上颌癌。平均住院时间为5.3天。螺钉技术在大多数标准上比较优越,其次是卡环技术和材料技术。讨论:根据研究结果,螺钉固定技术在外科医生无麻烦、易于制作、生物相容性和更好的患者生活质量方面比其他两种固定技术具有优势。它也可以用于无牙患者广泛的手术或口外支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Three Fixation Techniques of Immediate Surgical Obturators Following Maxillectomy - A Comparative Study.

Three Fixation Techniques of Immediate Surgical Obturators Following Maxillectomy - A Comparative Study.

Three Fixation Techniques of Immediate Surgical Obturators Following Maxillectomy - A Comparative Study.

Three Fixation Techniques of Immediate Surgical Obturators Following Maxillectomy - A Comparative Study.

Introduction: Conventional surgical obturators are widely used despite advancements in microvascular surgery for maxillary pathologies requiring resection due to poor surgical outcome/prognosis or financial constraints. This study was conducted to compare and evaluate three different techniques of fixation of immediate surgical obturators in maxillectomy cases.

Materials and methods: The study comprises 56 maxillectomy cases performed over 33 months from January 2021 to August 2023 in Tumkur with a minimal follow-up of 3 months. The different techniques of fixation of immediate surgical obturators are compared and evaluated for duration of fabrication, intraoperative fixation, stability, post-operative function, tissue healing and biocompatibility.

Results: Peak incidence was noted in the fourth and fifth decades of life. Both genders were almost equally involved in the study. The need for maxillectomy included - infective cystic pathology, odontogenic infections, mucormycosis, sinus pathologies and T1 maxillary carcinoma. The mean duration of hospitalisation was 5.3 days. The screw-based technique was superior in most of the criteria compared, followed by clasp-based technique and the material-based technique, respectively.

Discussion: Based on the results of the study, the screw-based fixation technique offers an edge over the other two fixation techniques in terms of being trouble free for the surgeon, easy to fabricate, biocompatible and better patient quality of life. It can also be used in edentulous patients with extensive surgeries or extraoral support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信