根据《精神卫生法》被拘留的种族化经历:一项照相语音调查。

IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY
Kamaldeep Bhui,Roisin Mooney,Doreen Joseph,Rose McCabe,Karen Newbigging,Paul McCrone,Raghu Raghavan,Frank Keating,Nusrat Husain,
{"title":"根据《精神卫生法》被拘留的种族化经历:一项照相语音调查。","authors":"Kamaldeep Bhui,Roisin Mooney,Doreen Joseph,Rose McCabe,Karen Newbigging,Paul McCrone,Raghu Raghavan,Frank Keating,Nusrat Husain, ","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nForty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racialised experience of detention under the Mental Health Act: a photovoice investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Kamaldeep Bhui,Roisin Mooney,Doreen Joseph,Rose McCabe,Karen Newbigging,Paul McCrone,Raghu Raghavan,Frank Keating,Nusrat Husain, \",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nForty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWe propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在英国的精神卫生系统中,强制入院和治疗(CAT)的比率正在上升。据报道,几十年来,欧洲和北美的移民、黑人和少数族裔之间一直存在差距。生活经验数据可以为减少强制护理提供新的见解。方法我们有目的地对接受CAT治疗两年内的人进行抽样,以最大限度地提高年龄、性别、种族和英格兰和威尔士精神卫生法不同“部分”的多样性。我们利用参与式的“照片声音”工作坊,将图像、文字说明和反思性叙述集合在一起,进行转录并进行主题分析和交叉分析。这种解释将参与者和同行研究人员的生活经历与研究团队联系在一起。预防性洞察告知逻辑模型以减少CAT。结果48名不同种族的人贡献了500多张图片和30个小时的记录叙述。相当大比例的参与者报告了多重疾病、不良的童年经历和照顾者角色。他们的经验表明,尽管早期寻求帮助,但在预防CAT方面协调不足;在寻求帮助时,他们没有被认真对待或相信。专业人员的轻蔑反应,甚至敌意,以及不必要的警察介入,都令人痛苦、耻辱,并有被定罪的风险。与会者希望(a)在危机中提供更多的宣传,(b)住院患者在社区环境中提供创伤知情的治疗和创造性支持,(c)家庭和护理人员的参与,以及(d)更多关于如何协商护理选择、上诉、限制和隔离的信息。从业人员被认为缺乏必要的技能来照顾遭受酷刑的种族化和创伤的人。结论我们提出了一个生活经验逻辑模型,用于实践、政策和立法解决方案,以减少认知不公、CAT和刑事化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racialised experience of detention under the Mental Health Act: a photovoice investigation.
BACKGROUND The rates of compulsory admission and treatment (CAT) are rising in mental health systems in the UK. Persistent disparities have been reported among migrants, and black and ethnic minorities in Europe and North America for decades. Lived experience data can provide novel insights to reduce coercive care. METHODS We purposively sampled people within 2 years of receiving CAT, to maximise diversity by age, sex, ethnicity and different 'sections' of the Mental Health Act (England and Wales) from eight health systems in England. Using participatory photovoice workshops, we assembled images, captions and reflective narratives, which were transcribed and subjected to thematic and intersectional analyses. The interpretation privileged lived experiences of participants and peer researchers alongside the research team. Preventive insights informed a logic model to reduce CAT. RESULTS Forty-eight ethnically diverse people contributed over 500 images and 30 hours of recorded narratives. A significant proportion of participants reported multimorbidity, adverse childhood experiences and carer roles. Their experiences indicated insufficient co-ordination to prevent CAT despite early help seeking; they were not taken seriously or believed when seeking help. Dismissive responses and even hostility from professionals and unnecessary police involvement were distressing, stigmatising and risked criminalisation. Participants wanted more (a) advocacy given in crisis, (b) trauma-informed therapeutic and creative support from inpatient into community settings, (c) family and carer involvement and (d) more information about how to negotiate care options, appeals, restriction and seclusion. Practitioners were felt to lack the essential skills to care for racialised and traumatised people subjected to CAT. CONCLUSIONS We propose a lived experience logic model for the practice, policy and legislative solutions to reduce epistemic injustice, CAT and criminalising care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信