神经肌肉阻滞剂对中重度ARDS的异质性治疗效果:ACURASYS试验的事后马尔可夫模型再分析

IF 21.2 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Michael Brunini,Jean-Marie Forel,Xavier Muracciole,Antoine Roch,Dominique Barbolosi,Laurent Papazian
{"title":"神经肌肉阻滞剂对中重度ARDS的异质性治疗效果:ACURASYS试验的事后马尔可夫模型再分析","authors":"Michael Brunini,Jean-Marie Forel,Xavier Muracciole,Antoine Roch,Dominique Barbolosi,Laurent Papazian","doi":"10.1007/s00134-025-08064-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe beneficial effects of systematic cisatracurium administration observed in the ACURASYS randomized, multicenter, double-blinded trial may depend on patient-specific factors. This post hoc analysis aimed to explore whether the impact of cisatracurium on mortality varies with baseline characteristics.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA Markov chain analysis was conducted using daily clinical states from inclusion to day 90: death (state 0), under mechanical ventilation (state 1), or weaned and alive at day 90 (state 2). Patient trajectories were modeled accordingly.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong the 321 included patients, subgroup analysis following univariate analysis focused on 130 individuals under 60 years with non-fatal McCabe scores. Within this subgroup, cisatracurium administration and absence of vasopressor use significantly reduced the probability of remaining ventilated. Estimated survival increased therefore from 0.63 (placebo group, N = 62) to 0.93 (cisatracurium group, N = 68). In contrast, among patients with a rapidly or ultimately fatal prognosis according to McCabe score, the probability of survival did not differ substantially between the placebo and cisatracurium groups. Among patients with a PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 100 mmHg at inclusion (N = 65), the estimated survival rate at day 90 was 0.93 in the cisatracurium arm compared with 0.63 in the placebo arm. For patients with a PaO2:FiO2 ratio > 100 mmHg at inclusion (N = 98), the corresponding survival rates were 0.92 and 0.63, respectively. In patients aged ≥ 60 years (N = 158), the daily probability of remaining mechanically ventilated was not influenced by any covariate, including the administration of cisatracurium. These results were confirmed by the performed simulations.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe systematic and short-term administration of cisatracurium in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS appears to confer greater survival benefit in those with a higher baseline life expectancy. Further validation through retrospective and prospective studies is warranted.","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogenous treatment effect of neuromuscular blocking agents for moderate-to-severe ARDS: a post hoc Markov model re-analysis of the ACURASYS trial.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Brunini,Jean-Marie Forel,Xavier Muracciole,Antoine Roch,Dominique Barbolosi,Laurent Papazian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00134-025-08064-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nThe beneficial effects of systematic cisatracurium administration observed in the ACURASYS randomized, multicenter, double-blinded trial may depend on patient-specific factors. This post hoc analysis aimed to explore whether the impact of cisatracurium on mortality varies with baseline characteristics.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA Markov chain analysis was conducted using daily clinical states from inclusion to day 90: death (state 0), under mechanical ventilation (state 1), or weaned and alive at day 90 (state 2). Patient trajectories were modeled accordingly.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong the 321 included patients, subgroup analysis following univariate analysis focused on 130 individuals under 60 years with non-fatal McCabe scores. Within this subgroup, cisatracurium administration and absence of vasopressor use significantly reduced the probability of remaining ventilated. Estimated survival increased therefore from 0.63 (placebo group, N = 62) to 0.93 (cisatracurium group, N = 68). In contrast, among patients with a rapidly or ultimately fatal prognosis according to McCabe score, the probability of survival did not differ substantially between the placebo and cisatracurium groups. Among patients with a PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 100 mmHg at inclusion (N = 65), the estimated survival rate at day 90 was 0.93 in the cisatracurium arm compared with 0.63 in the placebo arm. For patients with a PaO2:FiO2 ratio > 100 mmHg at inclusion (N = 98), the corresponding survival rates were 0.92 and 0.63, respectively. In patients aged ≥ 60 years (N = 158), the daily probability of remaining mechanically ventilated was not influenced by any covariate, including the administration of cisatracurium. These results were confirmed by the performed simulations.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe systematic and short-term administration of cisatracurium in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS appears to confer greater survival benefit in those with a higher baseline life expectancy. Further validation through retrospective and prospective studies is warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-08064-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-08064-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在ACURASYS随机、多中心、双盲试验中观察到系统性顺阿曲库铵给药的有益效果可能取决于患者特异性因素。本事后分析旨在探讨顺阿曲库铵对死亡率的影响是否随基线特征而变化。方法采用马尔可夫链分析从纳入到第90天的每日临床状态:死亡(状态0),机械通气(状态1),或在第90天断奶存活(状态2)。据此对患者轨迹进行建模。结果在321例纳入的患者中,单变量分析后的亚组分析集中在130例60岁以下的非致命性McCabe评分患者。在这个亚组中,顺阿曲库铵的使用和不使用血管加压剂显著降低了保持通气的可能性。因此,估计生存率从0.63(安慰剂组,N = 62)增加到0.93(顺阿曲库铵组,N = 68)。相比之下,根据McCabe评分,在快速或最终致命预后的患者中,安慰剂组和顺阿曲库铵组的生存概率没有显著差异。在纳入时PaO2:FiO2比值≤100 mmHg的患者(N = 65)中,顺阿曲库铵组第90天的估计生存率为0.93,而安慰剂组为0.63。纳入时PaO2:FiO2比值为100 mmHg的患者(N = 98),其生存率分别为0.92和0.63。在年龄≥60岁的患者中(N = 158),每天保持机械通气的概率不受任何协变量的影响,包括顺阿曲库铵的使用。仿真结果证实了上述结论。结论:对中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者系统且短期给予顺阿曲库铵,对于基线预期寿命较高的患者具有更大的生存获益。通过回顾性和前瞻性研究进一步验证是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heterogenous treatment effect of neuromuscular blocking agents for moderate-to-severe ARDS: a post hoc Markov model re-analysis of the ACURASYS trial.
PURPOSE The beneficial effects of systematic cisatracurium administration observed in the ACURASYS randomized, multicenter, double-blinded trial may depend on patient-specific factors. This post hoc analysis aimed to explore whether the impact of cisatracurium on mortality varies with baseline characteristics. METHODS A Markov chain analysis was conducted using daily clinical states from inclusion to day 90: death (state 0), under mechanical ventilation (state 1), or weaned and alive at day 90 (state 2). Patient trajectories were modeled accordingly. RESULTS Among the 321 included patients, subgroup analysis following univariate analysis focused on 130 individuals under 60 years with non-fatal McCabe scores. Within this subgroup, cisatracurium administration and absence of vasopressor use significantly reduced the probability of remaining ventilated. Estimated survival increased therefore from 0.63 (placebo group, N = 62) to 0.93 (cisatracurium group, N = 68). In contrast, among patients with a rapidly or ultimately fatal prognosis according to McCabe score, the probability of survival did not differ substantially between the placebo and cisatracurium groups. Among patients with a PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 100 mmHg at inclusion (N = 65), the estimated survival rate at day 90 was 0.93 in the cisatracurium arm compared with 0.63 in the placebo arm. For patients with a PaO2:FiO2 ratio > 100 mmHg at inclusion (N = 98), the corresponding survival rates were 0.92 and 0.63, respectively. In patients aged ≥ 60 years (N = 158), the daily probability of remaining mechanically ventilated was not influenced by any covariate, including the administration of cisatracurium. These results were confirmed by the performed simulations. CONCLUSION The systematic and short-term administration of cisatracurium in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS appears to confer greater survival benefit in those with a higher baseline life expectancy. Further validation through retrospective and prospective studies is warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信