中年老化与性能研究(MAPS):通过物理容量电池评估生物老化。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Roy Tzemah-Shahar,Ilona Shapiro,Einat Kodesh,Merav Asher,Yechiel Friedlander,Hagit Hochner,Maayan Agmon
{"title":"中年老化与性能研究(MAPS):通过物理容量电池评估生物老化。","authors":"Roy Tzemah-Shahar,Ilona Shapiro,Einat Kodesh,Merav Asher,Yechiel Friedlander,Hagit Hochner,Maayan Agmon","doi":"10.1007/s11357-025-01803-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aging is a risk factor for the development of chronic diseases; however, it is heterogeneous. Measuring aging in midlife, commonly done using laboratory markers and statistical methods for estimation of biological age (BA), cannot directly inform behavioral intervention goals aiming to promote healthier aging. The Midlife Aging and Performance Study (MAPS) examined the association between an extended, inclusive assessment of physical capacity (PC), as a behavioral marker of aging, and BA, estimated using the Klemera-Doubal method from 11 laboratory and physiological biomarkers, in 112 individuals aged 42-46 (47% women). PC was comprehensively measured by a battery covering five domains: muscle strength, endurance, balance, agility and flexibility. Better performance in strength, endurance, balance, and flexibility domains was correlated with younger BA (Pearson's r 0.33-0.49, p < 0.001). A lower composite PC score based on all five domains was significantly associated with an accelerated aging state in which BA was greater than chronological age. In a logistic regression, a composite PC score had an odds ratio of 0.40 (95% CI 0.25-0.64), demonstrating each incremental rise in PC corresponds with a 60% odds reduction of being in an accelerated aging state. The proposed PC battery could be used as a functional behavioral assessment for aging state, relevant for population wide risk-screening assessments, communicating intervention goals, and as a means to evaluate temporal changes in health, independent of laboratory tests.","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midlife aging and performance study (MAPS): evaluating biological aging through a physical capacity battery.\",\"authors\":\"Roy Tzemah-Shahar,Ilona Shapiro,Einat Kodesh,Merav Asher,Yechiel Friedlander,Hagit Hochner,Maayan Agmon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11357-025-01803-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aging is a risk factor for the development of chronic diseases; however, it is heterogeneous. Measuring aging in midlife, commonly done using laboratory markers and statistical methods for estimation of biological age (BA), cannot directly inform behavioral intervention goals aiming to promote healthier aging. The Midlife Aging and Performance Study (MAPS) examined the association between an extended, inclusive assessment of physical capacity (PC), as a behavioral marker of aging, and BA, estimated using the Klemera-Doubal method from 11 laboratory and physiological biomarkers, in 112 individuals aged 42-46 (47% women). PC was comprehensively measured by a battery covering five domains: muscle strength, endurance, balance, agility and flexibility. Better performance in strength, endurance, balance, and flexibility domains was correlated with younger BA (Pearson's r 0.33-0.49, p < 0.001). A lower composite PC score based on all five domains was significantly associated with an accelerated aging state in which BA was greater than chronological age. In a logistic regression, a composite PC score had an odds ratio of 0.40 (95% CI 0.25-0.64), demonstrating each incremental rise in PC corresponds with a 60% odds reduction of being in an accelerated aging state. The proposed PC battery could be used as a functional behavioral assessment for aging state, relevant for population wide risk-screening assessments, communicating intervention goals, and as a means to evaluate temporal changes in health, independent of laboratory tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeroScience\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeroScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01803-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01803-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衰老是慢性疾病发展的危险因素;然而,它是异构的。测量中年衰老,通常使用实验室标记和估计生物年龄(BA)的统计方法,不能直接告知旨在促进健康老龄化的行为干预目标。中年衰老与表现研究(MAPS)对112名年龄在42-46岁的个体(47%为女性)进行了扩展的、全面的体能(PC)评估(作为衰老的行为标志)和BA之间的关系进行了研究,BA使用klemera - double方法从11个实验室和生理生物标志物中估计。PC是通过一个涵盖五个领域的电池来全面测量的:肌肉力量、耐力、平衡、敏捷性和灵活性。较好的力量、耐力、平衡和柔韧性领域表现与较年轻的BA相关(Pearson’s r = 0.33-0.49, p < 0.001)。基于所有五个领域的较低的综合PC得分与加速衰老状态显著相关,其中BA大于实足年龄。在逻辑回归中,综合PC评分的比值比为0.40 (95% CI 0.25-0.64),表明PC每增加一次,处于加速衰老状态的比值降低60%。所提出的PC电池可作为衰老状态的功能行为评估,与人群风险筛查评估相关,传达干预目标,并作为独立于实验室测试的评估健康时间变化的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Midlife aging and performance study (MAPS): evaluating biological aging through a physical capacity battery.
Aging is a risk factor for the development of chronic diseases; however, it is heterogeneous. Measuring aging in midlife, commonly done using laboratory markers and statistical methods for estimation of biological age (BA), cannot directly inform behavioral intervention goals aiming to promote healthier aging. The Midlife Aging and Performance Study (MAPS) examined the association between an extended, inclusive assessment of physical capacity (PC), as a behavioral marker of aging, and BA, estimated using the Klemera-Doubal method from 11 laboratory and physiological biomarkers, in 112 individuals aged 42-46 (47% women). PC was comprehensively measured by a battery covering five domains: muscle strength, endurance, balance, agility and flexibility. Better performance in strength, endurance, balance, and flexibility domains was correlated with younger BA (Pearson's r 0.33-0.49, p < 0.001). A lower composite PC score based on all five domains was significantly associated with an accelerated aging state in which BA was greater than chronological age. In a logistic regression, a composite PC score had an odds ratio of 0.40 (95% CI 0.25-0.64), demonstrating each incremental rise in PC corresponds with a 60% odds reduction of being in an accelerated aging state. The proposed PC battery could be used as a functional behavioral assessment for aging state, relevant for population wide risk-screening assessments, communicating intervention goals, and as a means to evaluate temporal changes in health, independent of laboratory tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信