光学雾化是降低近视过高估计的有效方法。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jiajia Lin , Ting Chen , Zequn Lin , Xinyao Xiong , Yinhe Chen , Yang Yu , Luoming Huang
{"title":"光学雾化是降低近视过高估计的有效方法。","authors":"Jiajia Lin ,&nbsp;Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Zequn Lin ,&nbsp;Xinyao Xiong ,&nbsp;Yinhe Chen ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Luoming Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of optical fogging in controlling accommodation and to evaluate its efficiency in reducing myopic overestimation among young adults, with the goal of providing scientific evidence for clinical refractive measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 142 young adults aged 17 to 23 years (284 eyes) were enrolled. Refractive status and ocular biometric parameters were measured using open-field autorefractor and partial coherence interferometry under three conditions: baseline, optical fogging, and cycloplegia. Optical fogging was induced by wearing +2.00 D spherical lenses for 20 min, while cycloplegia was induced using 0.5 % compound tropicamide-phenylephrine eye drops. Eyes were categorized into overestimated and non-overestimated myopia groups based on whether the difference in spherical equivalent (SE) between cycloplegic and baseline measurements was ≥0.50 D. Changes in SE and lens thickness under the three conditions were analyzed, and the efficiency of optical fogging-induced accommodative control was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the overestimated myopia group (82 eyes), optical fogging reduced accommodation by an average of 0.28 ± 0.37 D compared to baseline (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), accounting for 36.84 % of the effect of cycloplegia (0.76 ± 0.29 D). In the total sample eyes, optical fogging reduced accommodation by 0.07 ± 0.34 D (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), which corresponded to 21.88 % of the cycloplegic effect (0.32 ± 0.37 D). Lens thickness showed no significant change after optical fogging (all <em>p &gt; 0.05</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Optical fogging effectively suppresses unnecessary accommodative responses in young adults, significantly reducing myopic overestimation, with particularly pronounced effects in those with notable myopic overestimation. Although optical fogging is less effective than cycloplegia in relaxing accommodation, it offers advantages in terms of ease of use, non-invasiveness, and good tolerance, making it highly applicable in clinical refractive measurement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 104751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical fogging is an effective method of reducing overestimation of myopia\",\"authors\":\"Jiajia Lin ,&nbsp;Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Zequn Lin ,&nbsp;Xinyao Xiong ,&nbsp;Yinhe Chen ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Luoming Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of optical fogging in controlling accommodation and to evaluate its efficiency in reducing myopic overestimation among young adults, with the goal of providing scientific evidence for clinical refractive measurement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 142 young adults aged 17 to 23 years (284 eyes) were enrolled. Refractive status and ocular biometric parameters were measured using open-field autorefractor and partial coherence interferometry under three conditions: baseline, optical fogging, and cycloplegia. Optical fogging was induced by wearing +2.00 D spherical lenses for 20 min, while cycloplegia was induced using 0.5 % compound tropicamide-phenylephrine eye drops. Eyes were categorized into overestimated and non-overestimated myopia groups based on whether the difference in spherical equivalent (SE) between cycloplegic and baseline measurements was ≥0.50 D. Changes in SE and lens thickness under the three conditions were analyzed, and the efficiency of optical fogging-induced accommodative control was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the overestimated myopia group (82 eyes), optical fogging reduced accommodation by an average of 0.28 ± 0.37 D compared to baseline (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), accounting for 36.84 % of the effect of cycloplegia (0.76 ± 0.29 D). In the total sample eyes, optical fogging reduced accommodation by 0.07 ± 0.34 D (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), which corresponded to 21.88 % of the cycloplegic effect (0.32 ± 0.37 D). Lens thickness showed no significant change after optical fogging (all <em>p &gt; 0.05</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Optical fogging effectively suppresses unnecessary accommodative responses in young adults, significantly reducing myopic overestimation, with particularly pronounced effects in those with notable myopic overestimation. Although optical fogging is less effective than cycloplegia in relaxing accommodation, it offers advantages in terms of ease of use, non-invasiveness, and good tolerance, making it highly applicable in clinical refractive measurement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025002832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025002832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨光学雾化控制调节的效果,并评价其在降低青少年近视高估中的效果,为临床屈光测量提供科学依据。方法:共招募了142名17 ~ 23岁的年轻人(284只眼)。在基线、光学雾化和睫状体麻痹三种情况下,使用开场自折射仪和部分相干干涉测量屈光状态和眼部生物特征参数。采用+2.00 D球面镜片配戴20分钟致光学雾化,0.5%复方热带酰胺-苯肾上腺素滴眼液致睫状体麻痹。根据眼球等效值(SE)与基线测量值的差值是否≥0.50 d,将眼分为高估和非高估近视组。分析三种情况下眼球等效值和晶状体厚度的变化,并计算雾诱导调节控制的效率。结果:在高估近视组(82只眼)中,光学雾化使调节能力较基线平均降低0.28±0.37 D (p < 0.001),占单眼麻痹效果(0.76±0.29 D)的36.84%。在整个样本眼中,雾化使调节能力降低了0.07±0.34 D (p < 0.001),相当于单眼麻痹效果(0.32±0.37 D)的21.88%。光学雾化后晶状体厚度无明显变化,而睫状体麻痹显著降低晶状体厚度(高估近视组:-0.07±0.10 mm, p = 0.003;总:-0.05±0.19 mm, p < 0.001)。结论:光学雾化可有效抑制年轻人不必要的调节反应,显著降低近视高估,对有明显近视高估的人群效果尤为显著。虽然光学雾化在放松调节方面不如睫状体麻痹有效,但它在易于使用,非侵入性和良好的耐受性方面具有优势,使其在临床屈光测量中非常适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optical fogging is an effective method of reducing overestimation of myopia

Background

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of optical fogging in controlling accommodation and to evaluate its efficiency in reducing myopic overestimation among young adults, with the goal of providing scientific evidence for clinical refractive measurement.

Methods

A total of 142 young adults aged 17 to 23 years (284 eyes) were enrolled. Refractive status and ocular biometric parameters were measured using open-field autorefractor and partial coherence interferometry under three conditions: baseline, optical fogging, and cycloplegia. Optical fogging was induced by wearing +2.00 D spherical lenses for 20 min, while cycloplegia was induced using 0.5 % compound tropicamide-phenylephrine eye drops. Eyes were categorized into overestimated and non-overestimated myopia groups based on whether the difference in spherical equivalent (SE) between cycloplegic and baseline measurements was ≥0.50 D. Changes in SE and lens thickness under the three conditions were analyzed, and the efficiency of optical fogging-induced accommodative control was calculated.

Results

In the overestimated myopia group (82 eyes), optical fogging reduced accommodation by an average of 0.28 ± 0.37 D compared to baseline (p < 0.001), accounting for 36.84 % of the effect of cycloplegia (0.76 ± 0.29 D). In the total sample eyes, optical fogging reduced accommodation by 0.07 ± 0.34 D (p < 0.001), which corresponded to 21.88 % of the cycloplegic effect (0.32 ± 0.37 D). Lens thickness showed no significant change after optical fogging (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Optical fogging effectively suppresses unnecessary accommodative responses in young adults, significantly reducing myopic overestimation, with particularly pronounced effects in those with notable myopic overestimation. Although optical fogging is less effective than cycloplegia in relaxing accommodation, it offers advantages in terms of ease of use, non-invasiveness, and good tolerance, making it highly applicable in clinical refractive measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.20%
发文量
509
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信