光疗在老年患者:十年的临床经验,在三级皮肤科诊所。

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY
Gökçe Işıl Kurmuş, Dilek Menteşoğlu, Selda Pelin Kartal
{"title":"光疗在老年患者:十年的临床经验,在三级皮肤科诊所。","authors":"Gökçe Işıl Kurmuş, Dilek Menteşoğlu, Selda Pelin Kartal","doi":"10.1177/15578550251364196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Phototherapy is a well-established treatment for various chronic inflammatory dermatoses, yet data on its safety and efficacy in geriatric populations remain limited. Older adults face unique clinical challenges due to age-related physiological changes, comorbidities, and polypharmacy, which may impact treatment responses and tolerance. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of phototherapy in elderly patients treated over a 10-year period at a tertiary dermatology center. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years who received ≥8 sessions of phototherapy between 2013 and 2023. Narrowband UVB (NB-UVB), systemic psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA), and localized PUVA therapies were administered using standardized protocols. Diagnosis-specific clinical criteria were used to assess treatment response. Data on adverse events, recurrence, and the need for additional sessions were recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included 149 patients (mean age 70.2 ± 5.0 years; 44.3% female, 55.7% male) with 19 distinct dermatologic diagnoses. The most common indications were psoriasis (24.8%), generalized pruritus (18.1%), mycosis fungoides (11.4%), and lichen planus (6.7%). NB-UVB was used in 85.2% patients, while 10.1% received local PUVA and 4.7% underwent systemic PUVA. Overall, 83.2% of patients demonstrated clinical improvement. The highest treatment durations and cumulative doses were observed in mycosis fungoides (mean 9.3 months, 88.7 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) and lichen planus (9.5 months, 59.6 J/cm<sup>2</sup>). Adverse events occurred in 12.8%, predominantly mild erythema and pruritus. Recurrence was noted at 18.1%, and 16.1% required additional sessions. Despite 40.9% of patients using photosensitizing medications, no severe phototoxic reactions were observed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Phototherapy is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment option for elderly patients with a variety of dermatologic conditions. The high clinical response rates, even in complex and refractory cases, support its continued use in this population. With its favorable safety profile and non-systemic nature, phototherapy remains a particularly suitable modality in the context of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are warranted to establish standardized protocols tailored for geriatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phototherapy in Geriatric Patients: Ten Years of Clinical Experience in a Tertiary Dermatology Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Gökçe Işıl Kurmuş, Dilek Menteşoğlu, Selda Pelin Kartal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15578550251364196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Phototherapy is a well-established treatment for various chronic inflammatory dermatoses, yet data on its safety and efficacy in geriatric populations remain limited. Older adults face unique clinical challenges due to age-related physiological changes, comorbidities, and polypharmacy, which may impact treatment responses and tolerance. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of phototherapy in elderly patients treated over a 10-year period at a tertiary dermatology center. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years who received ≥8 sessions of phototherapy between 2013 and 2023. Narrowband UVB (NB-UVB), systemic psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA), and localized PUVA therapies were administered using standardized protocols. Diagnosis-specific clinical criteria were used to assess treatment response. Data on adverse events, recurrence, and the need for additional sessions were recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included 149 patients (mean age 70.2 ± 5.0 years; 44.3% female, 55.7% male) with 19 distinct dermatologic diagnoses. The most common indications were psoriasis (24.8%), generalized pruritus (18.1%), mycosis fungoides (11.4%), and lichen planus (6.7%). NB-UVB was used in 85.2% patients, while 10.1% received local PUVA and 4.7% underwent systemic PUVA. Overall, 83.2% of patients demonstrated clinical improvement. The highest treatment durations and cumulative doses were observed in mycosis fungoides (mean 9.3 months, 88.7 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) and lichen planus (9.5 months, 59.6 J/cm<sup>2</sup>). Adverse events occurred in 12.8%, predominantly mild erythema and pruritus. Recurrence was noted at 18.1%, and 16.1% required additional sessions. Despite 40.9% of patients using photosensitizing medications, no severe phototoxic reactions were observed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Phototherapy is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment option for elderly patients with a variety of dermatologic conditions. The high clinical response rates, even in complex and refractory cases, support its continued use in this population. With its favorable safety profile and non-systemic nature, phototherapy remains a particularly suitable modality in the context of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are warranted to establish standardized protocols tailored for geriatric populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15578550251364196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15578550251364196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:光疗是一种公认的治疗各种慢性炎症性皮肤病的方法,但关于其在老年人群中的安全性和有效性的数据仍然有限。由于年龄相关的生理变化、合并症和多种药物,老年人面临着独特的临床挑战,这可能会影响治疗反应和耐受性。目的:本研究旨在评价光疗在某三级皮肤科中心治疗10年以上的老年患者的安全性、有效性和临床结果。材料与方法:对2013 - 2023年间接受≥8次光疗的≥65岁患者进行回顾性分析。窄带UVB (NB-UVB)、全身补骨脂素加紫外线A (PUVA)和局部PUVA治疗采用标准化方案。诊断特异性临床标准用于评估治疗反应。记录不良事件、复发和需要额外疗程的数据。结果:纳入149例患者(平均年龄70.2±5.0岁;女性44.3%,男性55.7%),有19种不同的皮肤病诊断。最常见的适应症为牛皮癣(24.8%)、全身性瘙痒(18.1%)、蕈样真菌病(11.4%)和扁平苔藓(6.7%)。85.2%的患者使用NB-UVB, 10.1%的患者接受局部PUVA, 4.7%的患者接受全身PUVA。总体而言,83.2%的患者表现出临床改善。治疗时间和累积剂量最高的是蕈样真菌病(平均9.3个月,88.7 J/cm2)和扁平苔藓(9.5个月,59.6 J/cm2)。不良事件发生率为12.8%,主要为轻度红斑和瘙痒。复发率为18.1%,16.1%需要额外的治疗。尽管40.9%的患者使用了光敏药物,但未观察到严重的光毒性反应。结论:对于各种皮肤病的老年患者,光疗是一种安全、有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择。即使在复杂和难治性病例中,其高临床反应率也支持其在这一人群中继续使用。由于其良好的安全性和非全身性,光疗在多病多药的情况下仍然是一种特别合适的治疗方式。需要进一步开展大规模、多中心的前瞻性研究,以建立适合老年人群的标准化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phototherapy in Geriatric Patients: Ten Years of Clinical Experience in a Tertiary Dermatology Clinic.

Background: Phototherapy is a well-established treatment for various chronic inflammatory dermatoses, yet data on its safety and efficacy in geriatric populations remain limited. Older adults face unique clinical challenges due to age-related physiological changes, comorbidities, and polypharmacy, which may impact treatment responses and tolerance. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of phototherapy in elderly patients treated over a 10-year period at a tertiary dermatology center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years who received ≥8 sessions of phototherapy between 2013 and 2023. Narrowband UVB (NB-UVB), systemic psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA), and localized PUVA therapies were administered using standardized protocols. Diagnosis-specific clinical criteria were used to assess treatment response. Data on adverse events, recurrence, and the need for additional sessions were recorded. Results: The study included 149 patients (mean age 70.2 ± 5.0 years; 44.3% female, 55.7% male) with 19 distinct dermatologic diagnoses. The most common indications were psoriasis (24.8%), generalized pruritus (18.1%), mycosis fungoides (11.4%), and lichen planus (6.7%). NB-UVB was used in 85.2% patients, while 10.1% received local PUVA and 4.7% underwent systemic PUVA. Overall, 83.2% of patients demonstrated clinical improvement. The highest treatment durations and cumulative doses were observed in mycosis fungoides (mean 9.3 months, 88.7 J/cm2) and lichen planus (9.5 months, 59.6 J/cm2). Adverse events occurred in 12.8%, predominantly mild erythema and pruritus. Recurrence was noted at 18.1%, and 16.1% required additional sessions. Despite 40.9% of patients using photosensitizing medications, no severe phototoxic reactions were observed. Conclusions: Phototherapy is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment option for elderly patients with a variety of dermatologic conditions. The high clinical response rates, even in complex and refractory cases, support its continued use in this population. With its favorable safety profile and non-systemic nature, phototherapy remains a particularly suitable modality in the context of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Further large-scale, multicenter prospective studies are warranted to establish standardized protocols tailored for geriatric populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信