其他环境中的玫瑰:环境会改变鸟类和啮齿动物对新事物的反应。

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Chelsey C Damphousse, Kruti Joshi, Jana Abu-Alhaija, Diano F Marrone
{"title":"其他环境中的玫瑰:环境会改变鸟类和啮齿动物对新事物的反应。","authors":"Chelsey C Damphousse, Kruti Joshi, Jana Abu-Alhaija, Diano F Marrone","doi":"10.1159/000547763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The detection of novelty is a cognitive ability that is fundamental to survival. Following detection, a decision must be made to either approach (neophilia) or avoid (neophobia) the novel stimulus. The tendency to choose one strategy over the other is referred to as an animal's neotic preference. To date, the bulk of research reports that mammals are neophilic, while birds tend to be neophobic. These data, however, are differentiated not only by the class of animal (i.e., Mammalia vs. Aves), but also by the testing methods used, namely the context in which testing occurs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To disentangle these factors, we assessed the reaction to novelty in two commonly used domesticated species, rats and pigeons, within two different contexts, a novel testing arena (common for mammals) and within the home cage (common for birds).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we show that both rats and pigeons show neophobia in the home cage and neophilia in a testing arena, demonstrating that some degree of the differences previously reported are likely due to testing protocols. Moreover, individual scores in one testing protocol did not predict testing scores in the other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results limit the ability to: (a) compare findings across these paradigms and (b) conceive of neotic preference as a single stable trait across multiple (especially novel) contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":56328,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rose in Any Other Context: Context Alters the Responses of Both Birds and Rodents to Novel Objects.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsey C Damphousse, Kruti Joshi, Jana Abu-Alhaija, Diano F Marrone\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The detection of novelty is a cognitive ability that is fundamental to survival. Following detection, a decision must be made to either approach (neophilia) or avoid (neophobia) the novel stimulus. The tendency to choose one strategy over the other is referred to as an animal's neotic preference. To date, the bulk of research reports that mammals are neophilic, while birds tend to be neophobic. These data, however, are differentiated not only by the class of animal (i.e., Mammalia vs. Aves), but also by the testing methods used, namely the context in which testing occurs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To disentangle these factors, we assessed the reaction to novelty in two commonly used domesticated species, rats and pigeons, within two different contexts, a novel testing arena (common for mammals) and within the home cage (common for birds).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we show that both rats and pigeons show neophobia in the home cage and neophilia in a testing arena, demonstrating that some degree of the differences previously reported are likely due to testing protocols. Moreover, individual scores in one testing protocol did not predict testing scores in the other.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results limit the ability to: (a) compare findings across these paradigms and (b) conceive of neotic preference as a single stable trait across multiple (especially novel) contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Behavior and Evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Behavior and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547763\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发现新奇事物是一种认知能力,是生存的基础。在检测之后,必须决定是接近(新事物)还是避免(新事物恐惧症)新的刺激。选择一种策略而不是另一种策略的倾向被称为动物的新进化偏好。迄今为止,大量的研究报告表明,哺乳动物是亲新动物,而鸟类往往是恐新动物。然而,这些数据不仅根据动物类别(即哺乳动物与动物)进行区分,而且根据所使用的测试方法,即测试发生的背景进行区分。为了理清这些因素,我们在两种不同的环境下,在一个新的测试场所(哺乳动物常见)和一个家庭笼子(鸟类常见)中,评估了两种常用的家养物种,老鼠和鸽子对新奇事物的反应。在这里,我们表明,大鼠和鸽子在家里的笼子里表现出新恐惧症,在测试场所表现出新癖,表明之前报道的某种程度的差异可能是由于测试方案。此外,一种测试方案中的个体分数并不能预测另一种测试方案中的测试分数,这限制了(a)比较这些范式中的发现和(b)将新生偏好视为跨多个(特别是新)环境的单一稳定特征的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Rose in Any Other Context: Context Alters the Responses of Both Birds and Rodents to Novel Objects.

Introduction: The detection of novelty is a cognitive ability that is fundamental to survival. Following detection, a decision must be made to either approach (neophilia) or avoid (neophobia) the novel stimulus. The tendency to choose one strategy over the other is referred to as an animal's neotic preference. To date, the bulk of research reports that mammals are neophilic, while birds tend to be neophobic. These data, however, are differentiated not only by the class of animal (i.e., Mammalia vs. Aves), but also by the testing methods used, namely the context in which testing occurs.

Method: To disentangle these factors, we assessed the reaction to novelty in two commonly used domesticated species, rats and pigeons, within two different contexts, a novel testing arena (common for mammals) and within the home cage (common for birds).

Results: Here, we show that both rats and pigeons show neophobia in the home cage and neophilia in a testing arena, demonstrating that some degree of the differences previously reported are likely due to testing protocols. Moreover, individual scores in one testing protocol did not predict testing scores in the other.

Conclusion: These results limit the ability to: (a) compare findings across these paradigms and (b) conceive of neotic preference as a single stable trait across multiple (especially novel) contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Behavior and Evolution
Brain Behavior and Evolution 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
23.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' is a journal with a loyal following, high standards, and a unique profile as the main outlet for the continuing scientific discourse on nervous system evolution. The journal publishes comparative neurobiological studies that focus on nervous system structure, function, or development in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Approaches range from the molecular over the anatomical and physiological to the behavioral. Despite this diversity, most papers published in ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' include an evolutionary angle, at least in the discussion, and focus on neural mechanisms or phenomena. Some purely behavioral research may be within the journal’s scope, but the suitability of such manuscripts will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The journal also publishes review articles that provide critical overviews of current topics in evolutionary neurobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信