Giorgio Monteleone, Gioele Castelli, Giovanni Franco, Marialuisa Bocchino, Luigi Carroccio, Francesca Lalla, Francesca Cefaloni, Silvia Deidda, Davide Chimera, Rosangela di Liberti, Giuseppe Muscato, Jacopo Simonetti, Bruno Iovene, Francesco Varone, Tommaso Pianigiani, Laura Bergantini, Miriana D'Alessandro, Giacomo Sgalla, Luca Richeldi, Elena Bargagli, Barbara Ruaro, Paolo Cameli
{"title":"远程医疗在间质性肺病中的作用:意大利肺病学会/意大利呼吸学会(SIP-IRS)调查的结果。","authors":"Giorgio Monteleone, Gioele Castelli, Giovanni Franco, Marialuisa Bocchino, Luigi Carroccio, Francesca Lalla, Francesca Cefaloni, Silvia Deidda, Davide Chimera, Rosangela di Liberti, Giuseppe Muscato, Jacopo Simonetti, Bruno Iovene, Francesco Varone, Tommaso Pianigiani, Laura Bergantini, Miriana D'Alessandro, Giacomo Sgalla, Luca Richeldi, Elena Bargagli, Barbara Ruaro, Paolo Cameli","doi":"10.5826/mrm.2025.1026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine (TM) is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in the management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Despite its potential, its integration and application still remain limited. Our work aimed to assess pulmonologists' (physicians and trainees) perception regarding the use of TM in ILDs management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national survey was created and distributed to all pulmonologists, both physicians and trainees, affiliated with Società Italiana di Pneumologia/Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS). Responses were collected anonymously and analysed by using descriptive statistical analysis and the chi-square test. Results: Among 2,906 invited participants, 44 completed the survey. While 95.5% of respondents considered TM useful in ILDs monitoring, only 36% reported its use in clinical practice. Current barriers included reduced availability of TM services (64%) and limited knowledge of TM software (56.8%). Moreover, the majority of participants referred a supportive but not substitutive role of TM in-person consultations, especially in monitoring and patient education. A significant proportion of repliers (over 50%) claimed that it may reduce waiting lists and enhance patient satisfaction (63.6%). However, concerns regarding data security and absence of standardised protocols were also reported. Conclusions: TM is positively perceived by both physicians and trainees' pulmonologist for ILDs follow-up and educational purposes in ILD management. Nevertheless, its integration and application are still hindered by some concerns such as limited infrastructure and digital literacy as well as lack of standardisation of reimbursement protocols and evolving regulatory frameworks. Broader integration of TM will require to address these challenges through investments in technology, structured protocols, and training initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"20 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of the role of Telemedicine in Interstitial Lung Diseases: -Findings from Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory -Society (SIP-IRS) survey.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Monteleone, Gioele Castelli, Giovanni Franco, Marialuisa Bocchino, Luigi Carroccio, Francesca Lalla, Francesca Cefaloni, Silvia Deidda, Davide Chimera, Rosangela di Liberti, Giuseppe Muscato, Jacopo Simonetti, Bruno Iovene, Francesco Varone, Tommaso Pianigiani, Laura Bergantini, Miriana D'Alessandro, Giacomo Sgalla, Luca Richeldi, Elena Bargagli, Barbara Ruaro, Paolo Cameli\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/mrm.2025.1026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine (TM) is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in the management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Despite its potential, its integration and application still remain limited. Our work aimed to assess pulmonologists' (physicians and trainees) perception regarding the use of TM in ILDs management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national survey was created and distributed to all pulmonologists, both physicians and trainees, affiliated with Società Italiana di Pneumologia/Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS). Responses were collected anonymously and analysed by using descriptive statistical analysis and the chi-square test. Results: Among 2,906 invited participants, 44 completed the survey. While 95.5% of respondents considered TM useful in ILDs monitoring, only 36% reported its use in clinical practice. Current barriers included reduced availability of TM services (64%) and limited knowledge of TM software (56.8%). Moreover, the majority of participants referred a supportive but not substitutive role of TM in-person consultations, especially in monitoring and patient education. A significant proportion of repliers (over 50%) claimed that it may reduce waiting lists and enhance patient satisfaction (63.6%). However, concerns regarding data security and absence of standardised protocols were also reported. Conclusions: TM is positively perceived by both physicians and trainees' pulmonologist for ILDs follow-up and educational purposes in ILD management. Nevertheless, its integration and application are still hindered by some concerns such as limited infrastructure and digital literacy as well as lack of standardisation of reimbursement protocols and evolving regulatory frameworks. Broader integration of TM will require to address these challenges through investments in technology, structured protocols, and training initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/mrm.2025.1026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perception of the role of Telemedicine in Interstitial Lung Diseases: -Findings from Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory -Society (SIP-IRS) survey.
Background: Telemedicine (TM) is increasingly recognised as a valuable tool in the management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Despite its potential, its integration and application still remain limited. Our work aimed to assess pulmonologists' (physicians and trainees) perception regarding the use of TM in ILDs management.
Methods: This national survey was created and distributed to all pulmonologists, both physicians and trainees, affiliated with Società Italiana di Pneumologia/Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS). Responses were collected anonymously and analysed by using descriptive statistical analysis and the chi-square test. Results: Among 2,906 invited participants, 44 completed the survey. While 95.5% of respondents considered TM useful in ILDs monitoring, only 36% reported its use in clinical practice. Current barriers included reduced availability of TM services (64%) and limited knowledge of TM software (56.8%). Moreover, the majority of participants referred a supportive but not substitutive role of TM in-person consultations, especially in monitoring and patient education. A significant proportion of repliers (over 50%) claimed that it may reduce waiting lists and enhance patient satisfaction (63.6%). However, concerns regarding data security and absence of standardised protocols were also reported. Conclusions: TM is positively perceived by both physicians and trainees' pulmonologist for ILDs follow-up and educational purposes in ILD management. Nevertheless, its integration and application are still hindered by some concerns such as limited infrastructure and digital literacy as well as lack of standardisation of reimbursement protocols and evolving regulatory frameworks. Broader integration of TM will require to address these challenges through investments in technology, structured protocols, and training initiatives.
期刊介绍:
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research.
The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.