Lena Danielsson, Svein Bergvik, Are Hugo Pripp, Gunnvald Kvarstein
{"title":"基于集群组的接受和承诺治疗对慢性疼痛患者的疗效——一项随机对照半交叉试验。","authors":"Lena Danielsson, Svein Bergvik, Are Hugo Pripp, Gunnvald Kvarstein","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2025.2515106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for chronic pain when provided as weekly sessions, is well documented. In scarcely populated areas, the traveling distance may be a barrier to weekly attendance. This study aimed to test the efficacy of a group-based ACT intervention, clustered into three bouts of three consecutive days, separated by 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 122 patients, recruited from a university hospital pain clinic, were randomized to either a clustered ACT or Treatment As Usual (TAU) provided by the primary health care services. The study had a semi-crossover design. Group effects of ACT versus TAU were assessed 3 months after the start of ACT by using linear mixed models for repeated measures. Outcome measures included pain intensity, health-related quality of life, pain acceptance, catastrophizing, and psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients completed the ACT intervention. No statistically significant effects were observed on the primary outcome variables, pain intensity and health-related quality of life.</p><p><p>Significant group differences in favor of ACT were detected in pain acceptance (modified Cohen`s d = 0.32), including pain willingness (modified Cohen`s d = 0.30) and activity engagement (modified Cohen`s d = 0.23). The treatment effect remained at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups with a trend toward improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A group-based ACT for chronic pain clustered into 3-day bouts may strengthen pain acceptance processes, including pain willingness and activity engagement. Reasons why the intervention did not affect pain intensity and health-related quality of life are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"9 1","pages":"2515106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of a clustered group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain - a randomized controlled semi-crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Danielsson, Svein Bergvik, Are Hugo Pripp, Gunnvald Kvarstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2025.2515106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for chronic pain when provided as weekly sessions, is well documented. In scarcely populated areas, the traveling distance may be a barrier to weekly attendance. This study aimed to test the efficacy of a group-based ACT intervention, clustered into three bouts of three consecutive days, separated by 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 122 patients, recruited from a university hospital pain clinic, were randomized to either a clustered ACT or Treatment As Usual (TAU) provided by the primary health care services. The study had a semi-crossover design. Group effects of ACT versus TAU were assessed 3 months after the start of ACT by using linear mixed models for repeated measures. Outcome measures included pain intensity, health-related quality of life, pain acceptance, catastrophizing, and psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients completed the ACT intervention. No statistically significant effects were observed on the primary outcome variables, pain intensity and health-related quality of life.</p><p><p>Significant group differences in favor of ACT were detected in pain acceptance (modified Cohen`s d = 0.32), including pain willingness (modified Cohen`s d = 0.30) and activity engagement (modified Cohen`s d = 0.23). The treatment effect remained at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups with a trend toward improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A group-based ACT for chronic pain clustered into 3-day bouts may strengthen pain acceptance processes, including pain willingness and activity engagement. Reasons why the intervention did not affect pain intensity and health-related quality of life are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"2515106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2515106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2515106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:接受与承诺疗法(ACT)对慢性疼痛的治疗效果是有文献记载的。在人口稀少的地区,旅行距离可能成为每周出席会议的障碍。本研究旨在测试以组为基础的ACT干预的有效性,分为三组,连续三天,间隔4周。患者和方法:从一所大学医院疼痛门诊招募的122名患者被随机分配到由初级卫生保健服务提供的聚集性ACT或常规治疗(TAU)组。该研究采用半交叉设计。ACT与TAU的组效应在ACT开始3个月后通过线性混合模型进行重复测量。结果测量包括疼痛强度、健康相关生活质量、疼痛接受度、灾难化和心理困扰。结果:共有81例患者完成了ACT干预。在主要结局变量、疼痛强度和健康相关生活质量方面未观察到统计学上显著的影响。在疼痛接受(修正Cohen’s d = 0.32)、疼痛意愿(修正Cohen’s d = 0.30)和活动投入(修正Cohen’s d = 0.23)方面,ACT组间存在显著差异。在6个月和12个月的随访中,治疗效果仍有改善的趋势。结论:以小组为基础的ACT治疗慢性疼痛,集中在3天的疗程中,可以增强疼痛接受过程,包括疼痛意愿和活动参与。讨论了干预不影响疼痛强度和健康相关生活质量的原因。
The efficacy of a clustered group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain - a randomized controlled semi-crossover trial.
Purpose: The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for chronic pain when provided as weekly sessions, is well documented. In scarcely populated areas, the traveling distance may be a barrier to weekly attendance. This study aimed to test the efficacy of a group-based ACT intervention, clustered into three bouts of three consecutive days, separated by 4 weeks.
Patients and methods: A total of 122 patients, recruited from a university hospital pain clinic, were randomized to either a clustered ACT or Treatment As Usual (TAU) provided by the primary health care services. The study had a semi-crossover design. Group effects of ACT versus TAU were assessed 3 months after the start of ACT by using linear mixed models for repeated measures. Outcome measures included pain intensity, health-related quality of life, pain acceptance, catastrophizing, and psychological distress.
Results: A total of 81 patients completed the ACT intervention. No statistically significant effects were observed on the primary outcome variables, pain intensity and health-related quality of life.
Significant group differences in favor of ACT were detected in pain acceptance (modified Cohen`s d = 0.32), including pain willingness (modified Cohen`s d = 0.30) and activity engagement (modified Cohen`s d = 0.23). The treatment effect remained at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups with a trend toward improvement.
Conclusion: A group-based ACT for chronic pain clustered into 3-day bouts may strengthen pain acceptance processes, including pain willingness and activity engagement. Reasons why the intervention did not affect pain intensity and health-related quality of life are discussed.