阿片类镇痛药用于处方阿片类激动剂治疗或阿片类药物使用障碍患者的慢性非癌性疼痛:一项系统综述。

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vahid Ashoorion, Tushar Sood, Shezel Muneer, Jason W Busse, Danielle Rice, Jaris Swidrovich, Umair Majid, James Abesteh, Randi Q Mao, Abhimanyu Sud
{"title":"阿片类镇痛药用于处方阿片类激动剂治疗或阿片类药物使用障碍患者的慢性非癌性疼痛:一项系统综述。","authors":"Vahid Ashoorion, Tushar Sood, Shezel Muneer, Jason W Busse, Danielle Rice, Jaris Swidrovich, Umair Majid, James Abesteh, Randi Q Mao, Abhimanyu Sud","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2025.2499553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing public health concern in North America, often coexisting with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). Managing both conditions presents unique challenges, highlighting the need for evidence to guide decision making.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to conduct a systematic review that summarizes evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioid analgesics alone or in combination with opioid agonist therapy (OAT) to manage CNCP in people with OUD or with a history of OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED from inception to July 2023 for randomized studies and up to January 2025 for non-randomized studies that explored the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioids for people living with chronic pain and current or prior OUD. We assessed the risk of bias in included studies, evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach, and provided a narrative summary of treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 15,988 unique citations, of which six observational studies were deemed eligible to inform safety outcomes for review, while no observational studies or RCTs met the eligibility criteria for efficacy or effectiveness outcomes. The likelihood of suicidality was twice as high in CNCP patients with OUD receiving long-term opioid analgesics compared to those without OUD (absolute risk increase: 127; 95% CI: 36 to 249 more participants with suicidality in 1,000 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to opioid analgesics alone, the risk of fatal opioid-related overdose may decrease in patients with CNCP and OUD who receive both opioid analgesics and OAT (absolute risk reduction: 60; 95%CI: 18 to 94 fewer deaths in 1,000 participants; low certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of evidence to inform practice and policy regarding opioid analgesic prescribing amongst people with OUD. Existing evidence suggests that such prescribing is associated with a higher risk of suicidality, while the use of OAT together with opioid analgesics in this population may be protective against fatal overdose. Further observational and trial research is needed to clarify the benefits and harms of opioid analgesics for CNCP patients with OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"9 1","pages":"2499553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in patients prescribed opioid agonist therapy or with opioid use disorder: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Ashoorion, Tushar Sood, Shezel Muneer, Jason W Busse, Danielle Rice, Jaris Swidrovich, Umair Majid, James Abesteh, Randi Q Mao, Abhimanyu Sud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2025.2499553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing public health concern in North America, often coexisting with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). Managing both conditions presents unique challenges, highlighting the need for evidence to guide decision making.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aimed to conduct a systematic review that summarizes evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioid analgesics alone or in combination with opioid agonist therapy (OAT) to manage CNCP in people with OUD or with a history of OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED from inception to July 2023 for randomized studies and up to January 2025 for non-randomized studies that explored the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioids for people living with chronic pain and current or prior OUD. We assessed the risk of bias in included studies, evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach, and provided a narrative summary of treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 15,988 unique citations, of which six observational studies were deemed eligible to inform safety outcomes for review, while no observational studies or RCTs met the eligibility criteria for efficacy or effectiveness outcomes. The likelihood of suicidality was twice as high in CNCP patients with OUD receiving long-term opioid analgesics compared to those without OUD (absolute risk increase: 127; 95% CI: 36 to 249 more participants with suicidality in 1,000 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to opioid analgesics alone, the risk of fatal opioid-related overdose may decrease in patients with CNCP and OUD who receive both opioid analgesics and OAT (absolute risk reduction: 60; 95%CI: 18 to 94 fewer deaths in 1,000 participants; low certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of evidence to inform practice and policy regarding opioid analgesic prescribing amongst people with OUD. Existing evidence suggests that such prescribing is associated with a higher risk of suicidality, while the use of OAT together with opioid analgesics in this population may be protective against fatal overdose. Further observational and trial research is needed to clarify the benefits and harms of opioid analgesics for CNCP patients with OUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"2499553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320809/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2499553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2025.2499553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)在北美是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,通常与慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)共存。管理这两种情况带来了独特的挑战,突出表明需要证据来指导决策。目的:本研究旨在进行系统综述,总结阿片类镇痛药单独或联合阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)对OUD患者或OUD病史患者CNCP的疗效、有效性和安全性的证据。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL和AMED,检索从成立到2023年7月的随机研究,检索到2025年1月的非随机研究,这些研究探讨了阿片类药物对慢性疼痛患者和当前或既往OUD患者的疗效、有效性和安全性。我们评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,使用GRADE方法评估了证据质量,并提供了治疗效果的叙述性总结。结果:我们的搜索确定了15,988个独特的引用,其中6个观察性研究被认为有资格为安全性结果提供审查,而没有观察性研究或随机对照试验符合疗效或有效性结果的资格标准。接受长期阿片类镇痛药的CNCP OUD患者的自杀可能性是未接受OUD患者的两倍(绝对风险增加:127;95%置信区间:在1000名参与者中,有自杀倾向的参与者多出36至249人;中等确定性证据)。与单独使用阿片类镇痛药相比,同时使用阿片类镇痛药和OAT的CNCP和OUD患者发生致命性阿片类药物过量的风险可能会降低(绝对风险降低:60;95%可信区间:1000名参与者中死亡人数减少18至94人;低确定性证据)。结论:在OUD患者中,关于阿片类镇痛药处方的实践和政策缺乏证据。现有证据表明,这种处方与较高的自杀风险有关,而在这一人群中,OAT与阿片类镇痛药一起使用可能对致命的过量服用有保护作用。需要进一步的观察和试验研究来阐明阿片类镇痛药对CNCP合并OUD患者的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in patients prescribed opioid agonist therapy or with opioid use disorder: A systematic review.

Opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in patients prescribed opioid agonist therapy or with opioid use disorder: A systematic review.

Opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in patients prescribed opioid agonist therapy or with opioid use disorder: A systematic review.

Opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in patients prescribed opioid agonist therapy or with opioid use disorder: A systematic review.

Background: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing public health concern in North America, often coexisting with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). Managing both conditions presents unique challenges, highlighting the need for evidence to guide decision making.

Aim: The study aimed to conduct a systematic review that summarizes evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioid analgesics alone or in combination with opioid agonist therapy (OAT) to manage CNCP in people with OUD or with a history of OUD.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED from inception to July 2023 for randomized studies and up to January 2025 for non-randomized studies that explored the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioids for people living with chronic pain and current or prior OUD. We assessed the risk of bias in included studies, evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach, and provided a narrative summary of treatment effects.

Results: Our search identified 15,988 unique citations, of which six observational studies were deemed eligible to inform safety outcomes for review, while no observational studies or RCTs met the eligibility criteria for efficacy or effectiveness outcomes. The likelihood of suicidality was twice as high in CNCP patients with OUD receiving long-term opioid analgesics compared to those without OUD (absolute risk increase: 127; 95% CI: 36 to 249 more participants with suicidality in 1,000 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to opioid analgesics alone, the risk of fatal opioid-related overdose may decrease in patients with CNCP and OUD who receive both opioid analgesics and OAT (absolute risk reduction: 60; 95%CI: 18 to 94 fewer deaths in 1,000 participants; low certainty evidence).

Conclusions: There is a paucity of evidence to inform practice and policy regarding opioid analgesic prescribing amongst people with OUD. Existing evidence suggests that such prescribing is associated with a higher risk of suicidality, while the use of OAT together with opioid analgesics in this population may be protective against fatal overdose. Further observational and trial research is needed to clarify the benefits and harms of opioid analgesics for CNCP patients with OUD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信