政策、职业和性别:南丁格尔如何改革高等级护理和边缘化男护士。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1177/15271544251364249
Trae Stewart
{"title":"政策、职业和性别:南丁格尔如何改革高等级护理和边缘化男护士。","authors":"Trae Stewart","doi":"10.1177/15271544251364249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Florence Nightingale's mid-19<sup>th</sup>-century reforms-especially her emphasis on sanitation, holistic patient care, and empirical data-catalyzed the transformation of nursing from an unregulated, low-status occupation into a respected, professional field. American institutions rapidly adopted her model, establishing standardized training programs followed by state licensure. Yet, by framing nursing around traits traditionally coded as feminine (compassion, nurturing, moral duty), these reforms inadvertently excluded men, who had historically provided significant direct patient care in military, psychiatric, and community settings. This article employs a critical gender-theoretical lens-integrating feminist standpoint theory and Foucauldian analyses of power/knowledge-to explore how Nightingale's legacy simultaneously elevated the nursing profession and entrenched enduring gendered hierarchies. The article examines specific policies shaped by Nightingale's model, such as state nurse-registration laws, military nursing corps restrictions, and early American Nurses Association (ANA) bylaws, demonstrating how institutionalized gender norms marginalized male practitioners. It asserts that while Nightingale deserves acclaim for professionalizing nursing, the discipline must also reckon with her legacy's exclusionary effects. Finally, the article proposes concrete strategies to deconstruct persistent gender biases and foster a more inclusive nursing profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":"298-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy, Profession, and Gender: How Nightingale's Reforms Elevated Nursing and Marginalized Male Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Trae Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15271544251364249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Florence Nightingale's mid-19<sup>th</sup>-century reforms-especially her emphasis on sanitation, holistic patient care, and empirical data-catalyzed the transformation of nursing from an unregulated, low-status occupation into a respected, professional field. American institutions rapidly adopted her model, establishing standardized training programs followed by state licensure. Yet, by framing nursing around traits traditionally coded as feminine (compassion, nurturing, moral duty), these reforms inadvertently excluded men, who had historically provided significant direct patient care in military, psychiatric, and community settings. This article employs a critical gender-theoretical lens-integrating feminist standpoint theory and Foucauldian analyses of power/knowledge-to explore how Nightingale's legacy simultaneously elevated the nursing profession and entrenched enduring gendered hierarchies. The article examines specific policies shaped by Nightingale's model, such as state nurse-registration laws, military nursing corps restrictions, and early American Nurses Association (ANA) bylaws, demonstrating how institutionalized gender norms marginalized male practitioners. It asserts that while Nightingale deserves acclaim for professionalizing nursing, the discipline must also reckon with her legacy's exclusionary effects. Finally, the article proposes concrete strategies to deconstruct persistent gender biases and foster a more inclusive nursing profession.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"298-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544251364249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544251364249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔19世纪中期的改革——尤其是她对卫生、整体病人护理和经验数据的强调——催化了护理从一个不受监管、地位低下的职业转变为一个受人尊敬的专业领域。美国的教育机构迅速采用了她的模式,建立了标准化的培训项目,然后颁发国家执照。然而,通过围绕传统的女性特征(同情心、养育、道德责任)来构建护理,这些改革无意中排除了男性,他们历来在军事、精神和社区环境中提供重要的直接病人护理。本文采用批判性的性别理论视角——将女权主义立场理论和福柯式的权力/知识分析相结合——来探讨南丁格尔的遗产如何在提升护理职业的同时,巩固持久的性别等级制度。本文考察了南丁格尔模式形成的具体政策,如州护士注册法、军事护理团限制和早期美国护士协会(ANA)章程,展示了制度化的性别规范如何使男性从业者边缘化。它断言,虽然南丁格尔的专业化护理值得称赞,但该学科也必须考虑到她的遗产的排他性影响。最后,文章提出了具体的策略来解构持久的性别偏见,促进更具包容性的护理专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy, Profession, and Gender: How Nightingale's Reforms Elevated Nursing and Marginalized Male Nurses.

Florence Nightingale's mid-19th-century reforms-especially her emphasis on sanitation, holistic patient care, and empirical data-catalyzed the transformation of nursing from an unregulated, low-status occupation into a respected, professional field. American institutions rapidly adopted her model, establishing standardized training programs followed by state licensure. Yet, by framing nursing around traits traditionally coded as feminine (compassion, nurturing, moral duty), these reforms inadvertently excluded men, who had historically provided significant direct patient care in military, psychiatric, and community settings. This article employs a critical gender-theoretical lens-integrating feminist standpoint theory and Foucauldian analyses of power/knowledge-to explore how Nightingale's legacy simultaneously elevated the nursing profession and entrenched enduring gendered hierarchies. The article examines specific policies shaped by Nightingale's model, such as state nurse-registration laws, military nursing corps restrictions, and early American Nurses Association (ANA) bylaws, demonstrating how institutionalized gender norms marginalized male practitioners. It asserts that while Nightingale deserves acclaim for professionalizing nursing, the discipline must also reckon with her legacy's exclusionary effects. Finally, the article proposes concrete strategies to deconstruct persistent gender biases and foster a more inclusive nursing profession.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信