Mohammad Poursalehian, Ali Soltani Farsani, Pouya Tabatabaei Irani, Mohammad Ayati Firoozabadi, Javad Parvizi, Sm Javad Mortazavi
{"title":"白细胞酯酶诊断假体周围关节感染的最佳截止点是什么?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammad Poursalehian, Ali Soltani Farsani, Pouya Tabatabaei Irani, Mohammad Ayati Firoozabadi, Javad Parvizi, Sm Javad Mortazavi","doi":"10.1186/s42836-025-00325-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication following total joint arthroplasty that demands rapid, accurate diagnosis. The leukocyte esterase (LE) test shows promise, but studies vary in cut-off values and omit the centrifugation's effect. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the LE test across different cut-off values, both with and without centrifugation. We aimed to identify the optimal threshold for diagnosing PJI and to compare its diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to those of biomarkers recommended by the International Consensus Meeting (ICM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to May 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LE for PJI in TJA and provided sufficient data for constructing 2 × 2 contingency tables. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers using a standardized form and the QUADAS-2 tool. Statistical analysis involved pooling data using a bivariate random-effects model and constructing summarized receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2195 records, 26 studies involving 4,206 joints (1,282 with PJI) were included. The optimal LE cut-off point without centrifugation was 3 + , yielding a sensitivity of 0.877, a specificity of 0.957, and a DOR of 159.2. With centrifugation, a 2 + cut-off provided a sensitivity of 0.899, a specificity of 0.924, and a DOR of 108.6. Direct comparison with other biomarkers indicated that polymorphonuclear neutrophils percentage (PMN%), white cell count (WCC), and alpha defensin (AD) had a slightly higher diagnostic odds ratio and Youden index than LE. Direct comparison with other biomarkers also indicated that erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial CRP, and D-dimer had lower DOR and Youden index than LE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LE test is an effective diagnostic tool for PJI. Adopting a 3 + cut-off point without centrifugation and a 2 + one with centrifugation optimizes diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"7 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the best cutoff point of leukocyte esterase for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections? a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Poursalehian, Ali Soltani Farsani, Pouya Tabatabaei Irani, Mohammad Ayati Firoozabadi, Javad Parvizi, Sm Javad Mortazavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42836-025-00325-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication following total joint arthroplasty that demands rapid, accurate diagnosis. The leukocyte esterase (LE) test shows promise, but studies vary in cut-off values and omit the centrifugation's effect. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the LE test across different cut-off values, both with and without centrifugation. We aimed to identify the optimal threshold for diagnosing PJI and to compare its diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to those of biomarkers recommended by the International Consensus Meeting (ICM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to May 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LE for PJI in TJA and provided sufficient data for constructing 2 × 2 contingency tables. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers using a standardized form and the QUADAS-2 tool. Statistical analysis involved pooling data using a bivariate random-effects model and constructing summarized receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2195 records, 26 studies involving 4,206 joints (1,282 with PJI) were included. The optimal LE cut-off point without centrifugation was 3 + , yielding a sensitivity of 0.877, a specificity of 0.957, and a DOR of 159.2. With centrifugation, a 2 + cut-off provided a sensitivity of 0.899, a specificity of 0.924, and a DOR of 108.6. Direct comparison with other biomarkers indicated that polymorphonuclear neutrophils percentage (PMN%), white cell count (WCC), and alpha defensin (AD) had a slightly higher diagnostic odds ratio and Youden index than LE. Direct comparison with other biomarkers also indicated that erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial CRP, and D-dimer had lower DOR and Youden index than LE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LE test is an effective diagnostic tool for PJI. Adopting a 3 + cut-off point without centrifugation and a 2 + one with centrifugation optimizes diagnostic accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00325-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-025-00325-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:假体周围关节感染(PJI)是全关节置换术后的重要并发症,需要快速、准确的诊断。白细胞酯酶(LE)测试显示出希望,但研究在临界值上有所不同,并且忽略了离心的影响。在本研究中,我们评估了LE试验在不同临界值下的敏感性和特异性,无论有无离心。我们的目的是确定诊断PJI的最佳阈值,并将其诊断优势比(DOR)与国际共识会议(ICM)推荐的生物标志物进行比较。方法:综合检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase等数据库至2024年5月的文献。如果研究评估LE对TJA中PJI的诊断准确性,并提供足够的数据来构建2 × 2列联表,则纳入研究。数据提取和质量评估由两名审稿人使用标准化表格和QUADAS-2工具独立进行。统计分析包括使用双变量随机效应模型合并数据并构建汇总的受试者工作特征(sROC)曲线。结果:在2195份记录中,纳入了26项研究,涉及4206个关节(1282个为PJI)。无离心的最佳LE截断点为3 +,敏感性0.877,特异性0.957,DOR为159.2。离心时,2 +临界值的灵敏度为0.899,特异性为0.924,DOR为108.6。与其他生物标志物的直接比较表明,多形核中性粒细胞百分比(PMN%)、白细胞计数(WCC)和α防御素(AD)的诊断优势比和约登指数略高于LE。与其他生物标志物的直接比较也表明,红细胞沉降率(ESR)、血清c反应蛋白(CRP)、滑膜CRP和d -二聚体的DOR和约登指数均低于LE。结论:LE试验是诊断PJI的有效工具。采用无离心的3 +截止点和有离心的2 +截止点可优化诊断准确性。
What is the best cutoff point of leukocyte esterase for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication following total joint arthroplasty that demands rapid, accurate diagnosis. The leukocyte esterase (LE) test shows promise, but studies vary in cut-off values and omit the centrifugation's effect. In this study, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the LE test across different cut-off values, both with and without centrifugation. We aimed to identify the optimal threshold for diagnosing PJI and to compare its diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to those of biomarkers recommended by the International Consensus Meeting (ICM).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to May 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LE for PJI in TJA and provided sufficient data for constructing 2 × 2 contingency tables. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers using a standardized form and the QUADAS-2 tool. Statistical analysis involved pooling data using a bivariate random-effects model and constructing summarized receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves.
Results: Out of 2195 records, 26 studies involving 4,206 joints (1,282 with PJI) were included. The optimal LE cut-off point without centrifugation was 3 + , yielding a sensitivity of 0.877, a specificity of 0.957, and a DOR of 159.2. With centrifugation, a 2 + cut-off provided a sensitivity of 0.899, a specificity of 0.924, and a DOR of 108.6. Direct comparison with other biomarkers indicated that polymorphonuclear neutrophils percentage (PMN%), white cell count (WCC), and alpha defensin (AD) had a slightly higher diagnostic odds ratio and Youden index than LE. Direct comparison with other biomarkers also indicated that erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial CRP, and D-dimer had lower DOR and Youden index than LE.
Conclusions: The LE test is an effective diagnostic tool for PJI. Adopting a 3 + cut-off point without centrifugation and a 2 + one with centrifugation optimizes diagnostic accuracy.