难民和移民社区的都市农业干预:范围审查。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sophee Langerman, Nicolas Juarez, Ifrah Mahamud Magan, Odessa Gonzalez Benson
{"title":"难民和移民社区的都市农业干预:范围审查。","authors":"Sophee Langerman, Nicolas Juarez, Ifrah Mahamud Magan, Odessa Gonzalez Benson","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00991-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urban agriculture, known as urban farming, urban gardening, or community gardening, has become an important avenue for community development, food security, and economic stability in response to increased urbanization. However, a less studied aspect of urban agriculture is its application for historically marginalized communities and refugee and immigrant communities specifically. Using a two-fold research question: What are the domains of application of urban agriculture interventions on refugee and/or migrant populations? What are the scales and geographic patterns of urban agriculture interventions? Following scoping review guidelines, 42 articles published from 1990 to 2024 were included after screening out 375 articles that were initially retrieved from the database search. Articles were examined based on the following criterion: population of interest, intervention type, intervention scale, and geography of author. Findings suggest five domains of application: well-being, physical health, ecological, economic, and sociological, the latter as the most common domain. Health, particularly mental health, was less evident in scholarship. In terms of scale and geography, findings suggest that studies about large-size interventions were mostly in the Global South (Middle East and African regions specifically), and studies on small and medium-sized interventions were in the Global North (United States, Canada and Australia specifically). For theory, findings point to two broad theoretical domains: relationality and materialist, and less attention to food and environmental justice. These findings raise questions pertaining to access to resources insofar as resources determine the scale/size of interventions and thus their application. Issues pertaining to health and food and environmental justice were applications that largely did not emerge in the data, raising questions for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"857-871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban Agriculture Interventions in Refugee and Immigrant Communities: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sophee Langerman, Nicolas Juarez, Ifrah Mahamud Magan, Odessa Gonzalez Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11524-025-00991-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Urban agriculture, known as urban farming, urban gardening, or community gardening, has become an important avenue for community development, food security, and economic stability in response to increased urbanization. However, a less studied aspect of urban agriculture is its application for historically marginalized communities and refugee and immigrant communities specifically. Using a two-fold research question: What are the domains of application of urban agriculture interventions on refugee and/or migrant populations? What are the scales and geographic patterns of urban agriculture interventions? Following scoping review guidelines, 42 articles published from 1990 to 2024 were included after screening out 375 articles that were initially retrieved from the database search. Articles were examined based on the following criterion: population of interest, intervention type, intervention scale, and geography of author. Findings suggest five domains of application: well-being, physical health, ecological, economic, and sociological, the latter as the most common domain. Health, particularly mental health, was less evident in scholarship. In terms of scale and geography, findings suggest that studies about large-size interventions were mostly in the Global South (Middle East and African regions specifically), and studies on small and medium-sized interventions were in the Global North (United States, Canada and Australia specifically). For theory, findings point to two broad theoretical domains: relationality and materialist, and less attention to food and environmental justice. These findings raise questions pertaining to access to resources insofar as resources determine the scale/size of interventions and thus their application. Issues pertaining to health and food and environmental justice were applications that largely did not emerge in the data, raising questions for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"857-871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00991-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00991-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市农业,又称城市农业、城市园艺或社区园艺,已成为社区发展、粮食安全和经济稳定的重要途径,以应对日益增长的城市化。然而,城市农业研究较少的一个方面是它在历史上被边缘化的社区以及难民和移民社区的具体应用。使用一个双重研究问题:城市农业干预措施对难民和/或移民人口的应用领域是什么?城市农业干预的规模和地理格局是什么?根据范围审查指南,筛选了最初从数据库搜索中检索到的375篇文章后,纳入了1990年至2024年发表的42篇文章。根据以下标准对文章进行检查:关注人群、干预类型、干预规模和作者所在地理。研究结果提出了五个应用领域:福祉,身体健康,生态,经济和社会学,后者是最常见的领域。健康,尤其是心理健康,在学术研究中不那么明显。在规模和地理方面,研究结果表明,关于大型干预措施的研究主要集中在全球南方(特别是中东和非洲地区),而关于中小型干预措施的研究主要集中在全球北方(特别是美国、加拿大和澳大利亚)。在理论方面,研究结果指向两个广泛的理论领域:关系和唯物主义,以及对食物和环境正义的关注较少。这些发现提出了与获取资源有关的问题,因为资源决定了干预措施的规模/大小,从而决定了干预措施的应用。与健康、食品和环境正义有关的问题在很大程度上没有出现在数据中,这为进一步研究提出了问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urban Agriculture Interventions in Refugee and Immigrant Communities: A Scoping Review.

Urban agriculture, known as urban farming, urban gardening, or community gardening, has become an important avenue for community development, food security, and economic stability in response to increased urbanization. However, a less studied aspect of urban agriculture is its application for historically marginalized communities and refugee and immigrant communities specifically. Using a two-fold research question: What are the domains of application of urban agriculture interventions on refugee and/or migrant populations? What are the scales and geographic patterns of urban agriculture interventions? Following scoping review guidelines, 42 articles published from 1990 to 2024 were included after screening out 375 articles that were initially retrieved from the database search. Articles were examined based on the following criterion: population of interest, intervention type, intervention scale, and geography of author. Findings suggest five domains of application: well-being, physical health, ecological, economic, and sociological, the latter as the most common domain. Health, particularly mental health, was less evident in scholarship. In terms of scale and geography, findings suggest that studies about large-size interventions were mostly in the Global South (Middle East and African regions specifically), and studies on small and medium-sized interventions were in the Global North (United States, Canada and Australia specifically). For theory, findings point to two broad theoretical domains: relationality and materialist, and less attention to food and environmental justice. These findings raise questions pertaining to access to resources insofar as resources determine the scale/size of interventions and thus their application. Issues pertaining to health and food and environmental justice were applications that largely did not emerge in the data, raising questions for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信