Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Jing Zhang, Julia Moreira, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, Mary-Mac Chown, Joel Killam, Yang Hou
{"title":"1型神经纤维瘤病患者的视觉空间和视觉运动能力:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Jing Zhang, Julia Moreira, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, Mary-Mac Chown, Joel Killam, Yang Hou","doi":"10.1007/s11065-025-09673-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis estimated the group differences between individuals with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explored potential moderators. Systematic literature searches identified 2531 unique articles. Among them, 70 studies (183 effect sizes) were included in this meta-analysis, involving 3503 individuals' visuospatial and visuomotor abilities with NF1 (46.67% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.60 years) and 3127 individuals without NF1 (52.40% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 13.19 years). Robust standard error estimation techniques and random models were used to calculate standardized group differences. The results showed that individuals with (vs. without) NF1 exhibited significantly lower visuospatial (g = - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.00, - 0.80], I<sup>2</sup> = 64.59%) and visuomotor abilities (g = - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.05, - 0.75], I<sup>2</sup> = 74.87%). The moderator analysis revealed that group differences in visuospatial abilities were larger for children with NF1 (g = - 0.95; 95% CI [- 1.06, - 0.84]) than adolescents (g = - 0.64; 95% CI [- 0.91, - 0.37]) and adults (g = - 0.73; 95% CI [- 0.88, - 0.58]). Additionally, a greater between-group difference was found when visuospatial abilities were assessed using Judgment of Line Orientation (g = - 1.06; 95% CI [- 1.17, - 0.94]) than Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Visual Spatial Index (g = - 0.70; 95% CI [- 0.86, - 0.54]). Sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, IQ, learning disorder, ADHD, types of control group, sampling method, and exclusion criteria of NF1 participants were not significant moderators. The substantial visuospatial and visuomotor deficits in the NF1 population highlight the necessity for targeted interventions, and considerable between-study heterogeneity underscores that further exploration of predictors is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visuospatial and Visuomotor Abilities of Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Liyan Yu, Dan Liu, Jonathan M Payne, Jing Zhang, Julia Moreira, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, Mary-Mac Chown, Joel Killam, Yang Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11065-025-09673-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This meta-analysis estimated the group differences between individuals with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explored potential moderators. Systematic literature searches identified 2531 unique articles. Among them, 70 studies (183 effect sizes) were included in this meta-analysis, involving 3503 individuals' visuospatial and visuomotor abilities with NF1 (46.67% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 12.60 years) and 3127 individuals without NF1 (52.40% female; M<sub>age</sub> = 13.19 years). Robust standard error estimation techniques and random models were used to calculate standardized group differences. The results showed that individuals with (vs. without) NF1 exhibited significantly lower visuospatial (g = - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.00, - 0.80], I<sup>2</sup> = 64.59%) and visuomotor abilities (g = - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.05, - 0.75], I<sup>2</sup> = 74.87%). The moderator analysis revealed that group differences in visuospatial abilities were larger for children with NF1 (g = - 0.95; 95% CI [- 1.06, - 0.84]) than adolescents (g = - 0.64; 95% CI [- 0.91, - 0.37]) and adults (g = - 0.73; 95% CI [- 0.88, - 0.58]). Additionally, a greater between-group difference was found when visuospatial abilities were assessed using Judgment of Line Orientation (g = - 1.06; 95% CI [- 1.17, - 0.94]) than Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Visual Spatial Index (g = - 0.70; 95% CI [- 0.86, - 0.54]). Sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, IQ, learning disorder, ADHD, types of control group, sampling method, and exclusion criteria of NF1 participants were not significant moderators. The substantial visuospatial and visuomotor deficits in the NF1 population highlight the necessity for targeted interventions, and considerable between-study heterogeneity underscores that further exploration of predictors is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09673-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09673-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visuospatial and Visuomotor Abilities of Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis estimated the group differences between individuals with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explored potential moderators. Systematic literature searches identified 2531 unique articles. Among them, 70 studies (183 effect sizes) were included in this meta-analysis, involving 3503 individuals' visuospatial and visuomotor abilities with NF1 (46.67% female; Mage = 12.60 years) and 3127 individuals without NF1 (52.40% female; Mage = 13.19 years). Robust standard error estimation techniques and random models were used to calculate standardized group differences. The results showed that individuals with (vs. without) NF1 exhibited significantly lower visuospatial (g = - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.00, - 0.80], I2 = 64.59%) and visuomotor abilities (g = - 0.90; 95% CI [- 1.05, - 0.75], I2 = 74.87%). The moderator analysis revealed that group differences in visuospatial abilities were larger for children with NF1 (g = - 0.95; 95% CI [- 1.06, - 0.84]) than adolescents (g = - 0.64; 95% CI [- 0.91, - 0.37]) and adults (g = - 0.73; 95% CI [- 0.88, - 0.58]). Additionally, a greater between-group difference was found when visuospatial abilities were assessed using Judgment of Line Orientation (g = - 1.06; 95% CI [- 1.17, - 0.94]) than Wechsler Intelligence Scale-Visual Spatial Index (g = - 0.70; 95% CI [- 0.86, - 0.54]). Sex composition, NF1 inheritance mode, IQ, learning disorder, ADHD, types of control group, sampling method, and exclusion criteria of NF1 participants were not significant moderators. The substantial visuospatial and visuomotor deficits in the NF1 population highlight the necessity for targeted interventions, and considerable between-study heterogeneity underscores that further exploration of predictors is needed.
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.