脑损伤后长期抑郁症状的特征:症状轨迹组及其预测因子的系统回顾

IF 5 2区 心理学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Priscilla Prince, Kristin Naragon-Gainey, Rodrigo Becerra, Michael Weinborn, Carmela F Pestell
{"title":"脑损伤后长期抑郁症状的特征:症状轨迹组及其预测因子的系统回顾","authors":"Priscilla Prince, Kristin Naragon-Gainey, Rodrigo Becerra, Michael Weinborn, Carmela F Pestell","doi":"10.1007/s11065-025-09674-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review investigates the long-term trajectories of depressive symptoms in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) and identifies factors predicting group membership in these trajectories. The review follows the PRISMA guidelines and is registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY-2023-11-0013). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, EMBASE, CINHALPlus, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies published in English on adults aged 16 and above with an ABI diagnosis. Studies were included if they used a validated depression measure, had at least three assessment points, and applied group-based trajectory modelling. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing on neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders, or solely on treatments. The methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs' critical appraisal tool. The review synthesised data from ten studies involving 13,205 participants (average age 51.38 years, 55.86% male). Four depressive symptom trajectory groups were identified with varying prevalence: stable low (68%), persistent high (13%), increasing (20%), and decreasing (11%). Several key predictors including sex, age, injury severity, and education emerged as significant predictors of group membership in the persistent high, increasing, and decreasing depressive groups. However, variability in study methodologies and sample compositions posed challenges to direct comparison. Nonetheless, the review underscores the importance of long-term monitoring and the development of tailored interventions, as depression can manifest or intensify years post-injury. Understanding depressive symptom trajectories could help create personalised interventions, improving quality of life for those with depression after ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterising Long-Term Depressive Symptoms Post-brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Symptom Trajectory Groups and Their Predictors.\",\"authors\":\"Priscilla Prince, Kristin Naragon-Gainey, Rodrigo Becerra, Michael Weinborn, Carmela F Pestell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11065-025-09674-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review investigates the long-term trajectories of depressive symptoms in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) and identifies factors predicting group membership in these trajectories. The review follows the PRISMA guidelines and is registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY-2023-11-0013). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, EMBASE, CINHALPlus, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies published in English on adults aged 16 and above with an ABI diagnosis. Studies were included if they used a validated depression measure, had at least three assessment points, and applied group-based trajectory modelling. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing on neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders, or solely on treatments. The methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs' critical appraisal tool. The review synthesised data from ten studies involving 13,205 participants (average age 51.38 years, 55.86% male). Four depressive symptom trajectory groups were identified with varying prevalence: stable low (68%), persistent high (13%), increasing (20%), and decreasing (11%). Several key predictors including sex, age, injury severity, and education emerged as significant predictors of group membership in the persistent high, increasing, and decreasing depressive groups. However, variability in study methodologies and sample compositions posed challenges to direct comparison. Nonetheless, the review underscores the importance of long-term monitoring and the development of tailored interventions, as depression can manifest or intensify years post-injury. Understanding depressive symptom trajectories could help create personalised interventions, improving quality of life for those with depression after ABI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09674-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-025-09674-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述调查了获得性脑损伤(ABI)个体抑郁症状的长期轨迹,并确定了这些轨迹中预测群体成员资格的因素。该综述遵循PRISMA指南,并在注册系统评价和荟萃分析方案国际平台(INPLASY-2023-11-0013)上注册。对MEDLINE、PSYCINFO、EMBASE、CINHALPlus、ScienceDirect、Scopus和Web of Science进行全面搜索,确定了针对16岁及以上ABI诊断的成人发表的同行评议的英文研究。如果研究使用有效的抑郁测量方法,至少有三个评估点,并应用基于群体的轨迹建模,则纳入研究。排除标准包括专注于神经退行性或神经发育障碍的研究,或仅针对治疗的研究。使用Joanna Briggs的关键评估工具评估方法质量。该综述综合了10项研究的数据,涉及13205名参与者(平均年龄51.38岁,55.86%为男性)。四个抑郁症状轨迹组被确定为不同的患病率:稳定低(68%),持续高(13%),增加(20%)和减少(11%)。几个关键的预测因素,包括性别、年龄、伤害严重程度和教育程度,成为持续高、增加和减少抑郁组成员的重要预测因素。然而,研究方法和样品组成的可变性对直接比较提出了挑战。尽管如此,该综述强调了长期监测和量身定制干预措施的重要性,因为抑郁症可能在受伤后几年表现出来或加剧。了解抑郁症状轨迹可以帮助制定个性化的干预措施,改善ABI后抑郁症患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterising Long-Term Depressive Symptoms Post-brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Symptom Trajectory Groups and Their Predictors.

This systematic review investigates the long-term trajectories of depressive symptoms in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) and identifies factors predicting group membership in these trajectories. The review follows the PRISMA guidelines and is registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY-2023-11-0013). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, EMBASE, CINHALPlus, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies published in English on adults aged 16 and above with an ABI diagnosis. Studies were included if they used a validated depression measure, had at least three assessment points, and applied group-based trajectory modelling. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing on neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental disorders, or solely on treatments. The methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs' critical appraisal tool. The review synthesised data from ten studies involving 13,205 participants (average age 51.38 years, 55.86% male). Four depressive symptom trajectory groups were identified with varying prevalence: stable low (68%), persistent high (13%), increasing (20%), and decreasing (11%). Several key predictors including sex, age, injury severity, and education emerged as significant predictors of group membership in the persistent high, increasing, and decreasing depressive groups. However, variability in study methodologies and sample compositions posed challenges to direct comparison. Nonetheless, the review underscores the importance of long-term monitoring and the development of tailored interventions, as depression can manifest or intensify years post-injury. Understanding depressive symptom trajectories could help create personalised interventions, improving quality of life for those with depression after ABI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychology Review
Neuropsychology Review 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信