Pui Leng Choon, Alexander Ludwig, Rolf Ulrich, Robert Carl Gunnar Johansson
{"title":"空间响应代码与响度关联,但与亮度无关。","authors":"Pui Leng Choon, Alexander Ludwig, Rolf Ulrich, Robert Carl Gunnar Johansson","doi":"10.1177/03010066251361080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive associations between stimulus intensity and spatial response codes are thought to influence perceptual discrimination. We examined lateral response-set effects on auditory and visual intensity discrimination in a preregistered study with a large sample (<i>N</i> = 98). Participants responded to loud and bright stimuli using a button located to the left or right of the button used for soft and dim stimuli. In the auditory task, stimulus-response (SR)-mapping affected task-averaged error rates (ERs) but not task-averaged response times (RTs). However, loudness predicted response-side differences in both latency (<math><msub><mtext>RT</mtext><mtext>Left</mtext></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mtext>RT</mtext><mtext>Right</mtext></msub></math>) and accuracy (<math><msub><mtext>ER</mtext><mtext>Left</mtext></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mtext>ER</mtext><mtext>Right</mtext></msub></math>). By comparison, all tests of brightness discrimination supported the null or were inconclusive. Assessments of cross-modality correlations in SR-mapping effects were also inconclusive. These results replicate prior findings of lateral SR-mapping effects in auditory intensity discrimination and clarify inconsistencies in the visual domain. The lack of SR-mapping effects in brightness discrimination, along with inconclusive cross-modal correlations, challenges the notion of a common spatial processing mechanism for auditory and visual intensity comparison. If such a mechanism exists, its effects on visual judgments appear too subtle to be detected even in a large sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":" ","pages":"3010066251361080"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial response-code association for loudness but not brightness.\",\"authors\":\"Pui Leng Choon, Alexander Ludwig, Rolf Ulrich, Robert Carl Gunnar Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03010066251361080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive associations between stimulus intensity and spatial response codes are thought to influence perceptual discrimination. We examined lateral response-set effects on auditory and visual intensity discrimination in a preregistered study with a large sample (<i>N</i> = 98). Participants responded to loud and bright stimuli using a button located to the left or right of the button used for soft and dim stimuli. In the auditory task, stimulus-response (SR)-mapping affected task-averaged error rates (ERs) but not task-averaged response times (RTs). However, loudness predicted response-side differences in both latency (<math><msub><mtext>RT</mtext><mtext>Left</mtext></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mtext>RT</mtext><mtext>Right</mtext></msub></math>) and accuracy (<math><msub><mtext>ER</mtext><mtext>Left</mtext></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mtext>ER</mtext><mtext>Right</mtext></msub></math>). By comparison, all tests of brightness discrimination supported the null or were inconclusive. Assessments of cross-modality correlations in SR-mapping effects were also inconclusive. These results replicate prior findings of lateral SR-mapping effects in auditory intensity discrimination and clarify inconsistencies in the visual domain. The lack of SR-mapping effects in brightness discrimination, along with inconclusive cross-modal correlations, challenges the notion of a common spatial processing mechanism for auditory and visual intensity comparison. If such a mechanism exists, its effects on visual judgments appear too subtle to be detected even in a large sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perception\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3010066251361080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251361080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251361080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatial response-code association for loudness but not brightness.
Cognitive associations between stimulus intensity and spatial response codes are thought to influence perceptual discrimination. We examined lateral response-set effects on auditory and visual intensity discrimination in a preregistered study with a large sample (N = 98). Participants responded to loud and bright stimuli using a button located to the left or right of the button used for soft and dim stimuli. In the auditory task, stimulus-response (SR)-mapping affected task-averaged error rates (ERs) but not task-averaged response times (RTs). However, loudness predicted response-side differences in both latency () and accuracy (). By comparison, all tests of brightness discrimination supported the null or were inconclusive. Assessments of cross-modality correlations in SR-mapping effects were also inconclusive. These results replicate prior findings of lateral SR-mapping effects in auditory intensity discrimination and clarify inconsistencies in the visual domain. The lack of SR-mapping effects in brightness discrimination, along with inconclusive cross-modal correlations, challenges the notion of a common spatial processing mechanism for auditory and visual intensity comparison. If such a mechanism exists, its effects on visual judgments appear too subtle to be detected even in a large sample.
期刊介绍:
Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.