Paul Wesson, Eric Vittinghoff, Marilyn D Thomas, Stephen Crystal, Richard Hermida, James Walkup, Francine Cournos, Mark Olfson, Christina Mangurian
{"title":"识别弱势群体中的弱势群体:应用定量交叉性方法评估美国精神分裂症患者艾滋病毒连续护理中潜在的不平等。","authors":"Paul Wesson, Eric Vittinghoff, Marilyn D Thomas, Stephen Crystal, Richard Hermida, James Walkup, Francine Cournos, Mark Olfson, Christina Mangurian","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02972-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with schizophrenia face disproportionate risk of HIV, yet HIV testing remains low. Differential testing rates and engagement in care may be impacted by compounding social marginalization, partly linked to structural barriers. Grounded in intersectionality, we set out to identify the riskiest intersectional positions for HIV testing and engagement in HIV care in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a retrospective cohort of people living with schizophrenia and matched controls, using 2012 national Medicaid claims data. We coded intersectional positions based on schizophrenia diagnosis, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) models to assess intersectional effects for two outcomes, HIV testing and retention in HIV care (RIC) defined as ≥2 CD4 or HIV viral load tests ≥90 days apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 777,887 patients in the testing cohort, 7.7% tested for HIV; 39% of the 17,913 patients in the RIC cohort were retained in care. In MAIHDA models without fixed effects, intersectional positions explained 12.7% of the variance in HIV testing and 7.4% of the variance in RIC. In final models including fixed and random effects, intersectional positions accounted for 1.4% of the variance in HIV testing and 0.8% of the variance in RIC. Older Black men with schizophrenia had lower-than-expected RIC prevalence in final models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intersectional MAIHDA models can identify both vulnerable and resilient intersectional positions. The antagonistic intersectional effects for older Black men with schizophrenia highlight the need for targeted interventions to address structural barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the vulnerable among the vulnerable: applying quantitative intersectionality methods to assess potential inequities in the HIV continuum of care for people living with schizophrenia in the united States.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Wesson, Eric Vittinghoff, Marilyn D Thomas, Stephen Crystal, Richard Hermida, James Walkup, Francine Cournos, Mark Olfson, Christina Mangurian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00127-025-02972-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People living with schizophrenia face disproportionate risk of HIV, yet HIV testing remains low. Differential testing rates and engagement in care may be impacted by compounding social marginalization, partly linked to structural barriers. Grounded in intersectionality, we set out to identify the riskiest intersectional positions for HIV testing and engagement in HIV care in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created a retrospective cohort of people living with schizophrenia and matched controls, using 2012 national Medicaid claims data. We coded intersectional positions based on schizophrenia diagnosis, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) models to assess intersectional effects for two outcomes, HIV testing and retention in HIV care (RIC) defined as ≥2 CD4 or HIV viral load tests ≥90 days apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 777,887 patients in the testing cohort, 7.7% tested for HIV; 39% of the 17,913 patients in the RIC cohort were retained in care. In MAIHDA models without fixed effects, intersectional positions explained 12.7% of the variance in HIV testing and 7.4% of the variance in RIC. In final models including fixed and random effects, intersectional positions accounted for 1.4% of the variance in HIV testing and 0.8% of the variance in RIC. Older Black men with schizophrenia had lower-than-expected RIC prevalence in final models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intersectional MAIHDA models can identify both vulnerable and resilient intersectional positions. The antagonistic intersectional effects for older Black men with schizophrenia highlight the need for targeted interventions to address structural barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02972-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02972-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying the vulnerable among the vulnerable: applying quantitative intersectionality methods to assess potential inequities in the HIV continuum of care for people living with schizophrenia in the united States.
Background: People living with schizophrenia face disproportionate risk of HIV, yet HIV testing remains low. Differential testing rates and engagement in care may be impacted by compounding social marginalization, partly linked to structural barriers. Grounded in intersectionality, we set out to identify the riskiest intersectional positions for HIV testing and engagement in HIV care in the United States.
Methods: We created a retrospective cohort of people living with schizophrenia and matched controls, using 2012 national Medicaid claims data. We coded intersectional positions based on schizophrenia diagnosis, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) models to assess intersectional effects for two outcomes, HIV testing and retention in HIV care (RIC) defined as ≥2 CD4 or HIV viral load tests ≥90 days apart.
Results: Of 777,887 patients in the testing cohort, 7.7% tested for HIV; 39% of the 17,913 patients in the RIC cohort were retained in care. In MAIHDA models without fixed effects, intersectional positions explained 12.7% of the variance in HIV testing and 7.4% of the variance in RIC. In final models including fixed and random effects, intersectional positions accounted for 1.4% of the variance in HIV testing and 0.8% of the variance in RIC. Older Black men with schizophrenia had lower-than-expected RIC prevalence in final models.
Conclusion: Intersectional MAIHDA models can identify both vulnerable and resilient intersectional positions. The antagonistic intersectional effects for older Black men with schizophrenia highlight the need for targeted interventions to address structural barriers.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.