确定临床有用的COVID-19人群和急诊科表型在欧米克隆前期和欧米克隆时期。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lander Rodriguez-Idiazabal, Daniel Fernández, Jose M Quintana, Julia Garcia-Asensio, Maria Jose Legarreta, Nere Larrea, Irantzu Barrio
{"title":"确定临床有用的COVID-19人群和急诊科表型在欧米克隆前期和欧米克隆时期。","authors":"Lander Rodriguez-Idiazabal, Daniel Fernández, Jose M Quintana, Julia Garcia-Asensio, Maria Jose Legarreta, Nere Larrea, Irantzu Barrio","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01681-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapidly phenotyping patients can enhance healthcare management during new pandemic outbreaks. This can be accomplished through data-driven unsupervised methods that do not require clinical outcomes to be available. This study aimed to identify and compare phenotypes of COVID-19 patients and the subset of those patients who visited emergency departments using clustering techniques based on a limited set of easily accessible variables across different stages of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective study that included all reported adult COVID-19 patients in the Basque Country from March 1, 2020, to January 9, 2022. Phenotypes were identified separately for the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods in an unsupervised manner using clustering techniques based on easily obtainable clinical and sociodemographic variables. The clinical characteristics of the phenotypes were compared, and subsequently their association with the clinical outcomes was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four phenotypes were identified in both the general population and the emergency department sub-group in the pre-Omicron period, whereas three phenotypes were extracted in Omicron. Within each scenario, these phenotypes varied significantly in age and comorbidity rates, leading to varying associations with COVID-19 outcomes. Despite their similarities, the emergency department phenotypes consistently experienced worse outcomes than their general population counterparts. Moreover, the population and emergency department phenotypes identified during the Omicron period resembled those from the pre-Omicron stage, suggesting stable phenotypic structures throughout the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential of phenotype identification based on a few accessible variables for a meaningful segregation of patients. This approach could be extended to future pandemics as a preventive public health strategy, especially considering the growing likelihood of facing new ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying clinically useful COVID-19 population and emergency department phenotypes across the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.\",\"authors\":\"Lander Rodriguez-Idiazabal, Daniel Fernández, Jose M Quintana, Julia Garcia-Asensio, Maria Jose Legarreta, Nere Larrea, Irantzu Barrio\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01681-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapidly phenotyping patients can enhance healthcare management during new pandemic outbreaks. This can be accomplished through data-driven unsupervised methods that do not require clinical outcomes to be available. This study aimed to identify and compare phenotypes of COVID-19 patients and the subset of those patients who visited emergency departments using clustering techniques based on a limited set of easily accessible variables across different stages of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective study that included all reported adult COVID-19 patients in the Basque Country from March 1, 2020, to January 9, 2022. Phenotypes were identified separately for the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods in an unsupervised manner using clustering techniques based on easily obtainable clinical and sociodemographic variables. The clinical characteristics of the phenotypes were compared, and subsequently their association with the clinical outcomes was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four phenotypes were identified in both the general population and the emergency department sub-group in the pre-Omicron period, whereas three phenotypes were extracted in Omicron. Within each scenario, these phenotypes varied significantly in age and comorbidity rates, leading to varying associations with COVID-19 outcomes. Despite their similarities, the emergency department phenotypes consistently experienced worse outcomes than their general population counterparts. Moreover, the population and emergency department phenotypes identified during the Omicron period resembled those from the pre-Omicron stage, suggesting stable phenotypic structures throughout the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the potential of phenotype identification based on a few accessible variables for a meaningful segregation of patients. This approach could be extended to future pandemics as a preventive public health strategy, especially considering the growing likelihood of facing new ones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01681-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01681-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快速分型患者可以在新的大流行暴发期间加强卫生保健管理。这可以通过不需要临床结果的数据驱动的无监督方法来实现。本研究旨在利用基于大流行不同阶段的一组有限的易于获取的变量的聚类技术,识别和比较COVID-19患者和急诊就诊患者的表型。方法:我们进行了一项基于人群的回顾性研究,纳入了巴斯克地区2020年3月1日至2022年1月9日报告的所有成人COVID-19患者。使用基于易于获得的临床和社会人口学变量的聚类技术,以无监督的方式分别确定了前Omicron和Omicron时期的表型。比较表型的临床特征,随后评估其与临床结果的关联。结果:在前Omicron时期,在普通人群和急诊科亚组中发现了四种表型,而在Omicron时期提取了三种表型。在每种情况下,这些表型在年龄和合并症发生率方面存在显着差异,导致与COVID-19结局的相关性不同。尽管他们有相似之处,但急诊科的表型始终比普通人群的表型更差。此外,在基因组克隆时期确定的人群和急诊科表型与基因组克隆前阶段的表型相似,表明在整个大流行期间具有稳定的表型结构。结论:本研究强调了基于几个可获得的变量的表型鉴定的潜力,以实现有意义的患者分离。这种方法可以作为一种预防性公共卫生战略推广到未来的大流行病,特别是考虑到面临新流行病的可能性越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying clinically useful COVID-19 population and emergency department phenotypes across the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.

Identifying clinically useful COVID-19 population and emergency department phenotypes across the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.

Identifying clinically useful COVID-19 population and emergency department phenotypes across the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.

Background: Rapidly phenotyping patients can enhance healthcare management during new pandemic outbreaks. This can be accomplished through data-driven unsupervised methods that do not require clinical outcomes to be available. This study aimed to identify and compare phenotypes of COVID-19 patients and the subset of those patients who visited emergency departments using clustering techniques based on a limited set of easily accessible variables across different stages of the pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective study that included all reported adult COVID-19 patients in the Basque Country from March 1, 2020, to January 9, 2022. Phenotypes were identified separately for the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods in an unsupervised manner using clustering techniques based on easily obtainable clinical and sociodemographic variables. The clinical characteristics of the phenotypes were compared, and subsequently their association with the clinical outcomes was assessed.

Results: Four phenotypes were identified in both the general population and the emergency department sub-group in the pre-Omicron period, whereas three phenotypes were extracted in Omicron. Within each scenario, these phenotypes varied significantly in age and comorbidity rates, leading to varying associations with COVID-19 outcomes. Despite their similarities, the emergency department phenotypes consistently experienced worse outcomes than their general population counterparts. Moreover, the population and emergency department phenotypes identified during the Omicron period resembled those from the pre-Omicron stage, suggesting stable phenotypic structures throughout the pandemic.

Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of phenotype identification based on a few accessible variables for a meaningful segregation of patients. This approach could be extended to future pandemics as a preventive public health strategy, especially considering the growing likelihood of facing new ones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信