Kyoung Eun Yeob, So Young Kim, Yeon Yong Kim, Jong Hyock Park
{"title":"韩国残疾人和非残疾人精神病发病率和患病率的差异:一项国家数据库研究。","authors":"Kyoung Eun Yeob, So Young Kim, Yeon Yong Kim, Jong Hyock Park","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01691-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous epidemiological studies on psychotic disorders have been conducted, however, most were from an etiological perspective, used small sample sizes, or focused on a limited number of disabilities. Few studies have investigated all types of disabilities over a long observation period, and none have included the entire adult population of a country. To explore potential differences in the incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders between patients with and without disabilities, we conducted a serial cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using a data set linking the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, and disability registration data. Age-standardized incidence or prevalence rates were calculated for each year during 2008-2017 according to the presence, severity, and type of the disability. Factors associated with psychotic disorders were examined by multivariate logistic regression using the most recent data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardized incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders were higher among people with disabilities than among those without disabilities across all age groups, with particularly high rates observed among people with severe disabilities and those with intellectual disabilities. The gap in the prevalence of psychotic disorders between people with and without disabilities has widened over time. In regression analyses, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and mental health substantially reduced the odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders were higher in people with disabilities, especially those with severe disabilities, and intellectual disabilities. Policy efforts are needed to narrow the gap people with and without disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in the incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders among people with and without disabilities in south Korea: A national database study.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoung Eun Yeob, So Young Kim, Yeon Yong Kim, Jong Hyock Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01691-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous epidemiological studies on psychotic disorders have been conducted, however, most were from an etiological perspective, used small sample sizes, or focused on a limited number of disabilities. Few studies have investigated all types of disabilities over a long observation period, and none have included the entire adult population of a country. To explore potential differences in the incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders between patients with and without disabilities, we conducted a serial cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using a data set linking the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, and disability registration data. Age-standardized incidence or prevalence rates were calculated for each year during 2008-2017 according to the presence, severity, and type of the disability. Factors associated with psychotic disorders were examined by multivariate logistic regression using the most recent data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardized incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders were higher among people with disabilities than among those without disabilities across all age groups, with particularly high rates observed among people with severe disabilities and those with intellectual disabilities. The gap in the prevalence of psychotic disorders between people with and without disabilities has widened over time. In regression analyses, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and mental health substantially reduced the odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders were higher in people with disabilities, especially those with severe disabilities, and intellectual disabilities. Policy efforts are needed to narrow the gap people with and without disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01691-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01691-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities in the incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders among people with and without disabilities in south Korea: A national database study.
Background: Numerous epidemiological studies on psychotic disorders have been conducted, however, most were from an etiological perspective, used small sample sizes, or focused on a limited number of disabilities. Few studies have investigated all types of disabilities over a long observation period, and none have included the entire adult population of a country. To explore potential differences in the incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders between patients with and without disabilities, we conducted a serial cross-sectional study.
Methods: This study was conducted using a data set linking the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, and disability registration data. Age-standardized incidence or prevalence rates were calculated for each year during 2008-2017 according to the presence, severity, and type of the disability. Factors associated with psychotic disorders were examined by multivariate logistic regression using the most recent data.
Results: The age-standardized incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders were higher among people with disabilities than among those without disabilities across all age groups, with particularly high rates observed among people with severe disabilities and those with intellectual disabilities. The gap in the prevalence of psychotic disorders between people with and without disabilities has widened over time. In regression analyses, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and mental health substantially reduced the odds ratios.
Conclusions: The incidence and prevalence of psychotic disorders were higher in people with disabilities, especially those with severe disabilities, and intellectual disabilities. Policy efforts are needed to narrow the gap people with and without disabilities.
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.