以社区为基础的干预提高纳瓦霍族商店食品和饮料税收政策的意识和执行准确性。

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carmen George, Brianna John, Robert Alsburg, Renaldo Fowler, Malyssa Egge, Sharon Sandman, Rachel Whitman, Cameron Curley, Hendrik de Heer, Craig Manning, Caleigh Curley, Gloria Begay, Del Yazzie, Simental Francisco, Sonya Shin
{"title":"以社区为基础的干预提高纳瓦霍族商店食品和饮料税收政策的意识和执行准确性。","authors":"Carmen George, Brianna John, Robert Alsburg, Renaldo Fowler, Malyssa Egge, Sharon Sandman, Rachel Whitman, Cameron Curley, Hendrik de Heer, Craig Manning, Caleigh Curley, Gloria Begay, Del Yazzie, Simental Francisco, Sonya Shin","doi":"10.1177/15248399251357619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy food and beverage taxes are gaining global momentum, but implementation complexities at the retailer level are poorly understood. The only such policy in the United States, a 2014 Navajo Nation legislation, applies a 2% tax to unhealthy foods and beverages, while exempting healthy foods and beverages from their 6% Navajo sales tax. In 2019, approximately half of small stores had not implemented both taxes correctly, primarily the tax exemption. Therefore, this study aimed to provide culturally-informed promotional materials to enhance implementation accuracy in these stores and test the impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stores (N = 20) were randomly assigned to receive early promotional materials versus a waitlist group. Three to 6 months later, we visited all stores to purchase healthy and less healthy items, at which time waitlist stores received materials. Implementation accuracy of the junk food tax and exemption were tracked and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall implementation accuracy of both taxes increased from 0% to 20% at follow-up (p = .013). Tax waiver accuracy increased from 5% to 30% (p = .065). Comparing intervention versus waitlist stores, we observed no difference in implementation of tax exemption and a non-significant increase in accuracy of added tax on unhealthy foods and beverages (90% vs. 70%, p = .284). The study process revealed strengths and barriers to impactful store outreach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Grounded in community partnership, we explored a promotional outreach strategy to enhance accurate implementation of Navajo Nation food and beverage taxes. Our findings suggest store outreach and promotional materials could address confusion issues, while barriers related to store capacity merit further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251357619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-Based Intervention to Promote Awareness and Implementation Accuracy of Food and Beverage Tax Policies in Stores on Navajo Nation.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen George, Brianna John, Robert Alsburg, Renaldo Fowler, Malyssa Egge, Sharon Sandman, Rachel Whitman, Cameron Curley, Hendrik de Heer, Craig Manning, Caleigh Curley, Gloria Begay, Del Yazzie, Simental Francisco, Sonya Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251357619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy food and beverage taxes are gaining global momentum, but implementation complexities at the retailer level are poorly understood. The only such policy in the United States, a 2014 Navajo Nation legislation, applies a 2% tax to unhealthy foods and beverages, while exempting healthy foods and beverages from their 6% Navajo sales tax. In 2019, approximately half of small stores had not implemented both taxes correctly, primarily the tax exemption. Therefore, this study aimed to provide culturally-informed promotional materials to enhance implementation accuracy in these stores and test the impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stores (N = 20) were randomly assigned to receive early promotional materials versus a waitlist group. Three to 6 months later, we visited all stores to purchase healthy and less healthy items, at which time waitlist stores received materials. Implementation accuracy of the junk food tax and exemption were tracked and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall implementation accuracy of both taxes increased from 0% to 20% at follow-up (p = .013). Tax waiver accuracy increased from 5% to 30% (p = .065). Comparing intervention versus waitlist stores, we observed no difference in implementation of tax exemption and a non-significant increase in accuracy of added tax on unhealthy foods and beverages (90% vs. 70%, p = .284). The study process revealed strengths and barriers to impactful store outreach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Grounded in community partnership, we explored a promotional outreach strategy to enhance accurate implementation of Navajo Nation food and beverage taxes. Our findings suggest store outreach and promotional materials could address confusion issues, while barriers related to store capacity merit further exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251357619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251357619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251357619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不健康食品和饮料税正获得全球势头,但在零售商层面实施的复杂性知之甚少。美国唯一的此类政策是2014年纳瓦霍国家立法,对不健康食品和饮料征收2%的税,而健康食品和饮料免征6%的纳瓦霍销售税。2019年,大约一半的小商店没有正确实施这两种税,主要是免税。因此,本研究旨在提供具有文化信息的宣传材料,以提高这些商店的实施准确性,并测试其影响。方法:商店(N = 20)被随机分配接收早期促销材料,而不是等待名单组。3 - 6个月后,我们走访了所有商店,购买健康和不健康的物品,等待名单商店收到材料。对垃圾食品税收减免的实施准确性进行了跟踪比较。结果:在随访中,两种税种的总体执行准确率从0%提高到20% (p = 0.013)。免税准确性从5%提高到30% (p = 0.065)。将干预商店与等候商店进行比较,我们观察到在实施免税方面没有差异,不健康食品和饮料附加税的准确性也没有显著提高(90%对70%,p = .284)。研究过程揭示了有效的商店推广的优势和障碍。讨论:以社区伙伴关系为基础,我们探索了一种推广推广策略,以提高纳瓦霍民族食品和饮料税的准确实施。我们的研究结果表明,商店外展和促销材料可以解决混淆问题,而与商店容量相关的障碍值得进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community-Based Intervention to Promote Awareness and Implementation Accuracy of Food and Beverage Tax Policies in Stores on Navajo Nation.

Background: Unhealthy food and beverage taxes are gaining global momentum, but implementation complexities at the retailer level are poorly understood. The only such policy in the United States, a 2014 Navajo Nation legislation, applies a 2% tax to unhealthy foods and beverages, while exempting healthy foods and beverages from their 6% Navajo sales tax. In 2019, approximately half of small stores had not implemented both taxes correctly, primarily the tax exemption. Therefore, this study aimed to provide culturally-informed promotional materials to enhance implementation accuracy in these stores and test the impact.

Methods: Stores (N = 20) were randomly assigned to receive early promotional materials versus a waitlist group. Three to 6 months later, we visited all stores to purchase healthy and less healthy items, at which time waitlist stores received materials. Implementation accuracy of the junk food tax and exemption were tracked and compared.

Results: Overall implementation accuracy of both taxes increased from 0% to 20% at follow-up (p = .013). Tax waiver accuracy increased from 5% to 30% (p = .065). Comparing intervention versus waitlist stores, we observed no difference in implementation of tax exemption and a non-significant increase in accuracy of added tax on unhealthy foods and beverages (90% vs. 70%, p = .284). The study process revealed strengths and barriers to impactful store outreach.

Discussion: Grounded in community partnership, we explored a promotional outreach strategy to enhance accurate implementation of Navajo Nation food and beverage taxes. Our findings suggest store outreach and promotional materials could address confusion issues, while barriers related to store capacity merit further exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信