射频治疗原发性痛经的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Beatriz García-García, María José Díaz-Arribas, María Alicia Urraca-Gesto, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Rosa María Ortiz-Gutiérrez, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano
{"title":"射频治疗原发性痛经的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Beatriz García-García, María José Díaz-Arribas, María Alicia Urraca-Gesto, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Rosa María Ortiz-Gutiérrez, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano","doi":"10.1177/27683605251363182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Noninvasive, nonablative capacitive and resistive radiofrequency has emerged as a therapeutic tool for managing pelvic pain. However, research on its efficacy in pelvic floor dysfunctions is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of capacitive and resistive radiofrequency therapy for primary dysmenorrhea. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was conducted. Forty-five nulliparous women with a medical diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: transabdominal radiofrequency, intracavitary radiofrequency, or control. The intervention groups received nine 20-min sessions, with 3 sessions per week over 3 weeks between menstrual cycles. Pain intensity, menstrual quality of life, general quality of life, and pain pressure thresholds were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and at 1-month follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both transabdominal and intracavitary radiofrequency significantly reduced pain intensity compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Intracavitary radiofrequency achieved a greater reduction than transabdominal, although this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.311). No significant between-group differences were observed in mechanical sensitivity (<i>p</i> > 0.05) across all pressure points. Menstrual quality of life significantly improved in the intracavitary group compared with the control (<i>p</i> = 0.023), whereas the transabdominal group showed no significant improvement (<i>p</i> = 0.176). Changes in general quality of life were not statistically significant in any group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Both transabdominal and intracavitary radiofrequency therapies produced short-term reduction in pain intensity in women with primary dysmenorrhea. As the efficacy between modalities did not differ significantly, treatment could be tailored to patient preference and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Radiofrequency in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz García-García, María José Díaz-Arribas, María Alicia Urraca-Gesto, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Rosa María Ortiz-Gutiérrez, Gustavo Plaza-Manzano\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27683605251363182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Noninvasive, nonablative capacitive and resistive radiofrequency has emerged as a therapeutic tool for managing pelvic pain. However, research on its efficacy in pelvic floor dysfunctions is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of capacitive and resistive radiofrequency therapy for primary dysmenorrhea. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was conducted. Forty-five nulliparous women with a medical diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: transabdominal radiofrequency, intracavitary radiofrequency, or control. The intervention groups received nine 20-min sessions, with 3 sessions per week over 3 weeks between menstrual cycles. Pain intensity, menstrual quality of life, general quality of life, and pain pressure thresholds were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and at 1-month follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both transabdominal and intracavitary radiofrequency significantly reduced pain intensity compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Intracavitary radiofrequency achieved a greater reduction than transabdominal, although this difference was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.311). No significant between-group differences were observed in mechanical sensitivity (<i>p</i> > 0.05) across all pressure points. Menstrual quality of life significantly improved in the intracavitary group compared with the control (<i>p</i> = 0.023), whereas the transabdominal group showed no significant improvement (<i>p</i> = 0.176). Changes in general quality of life were not statistically significant in any group (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Both transabdominal and intracavitary radiofrequency therapies produced short-term reduction in pain intensity in women with primary dysmenorrhea. As the efficacy between modalities did not differ significantly, treatment could be tailored to patient preference and tolerability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251363182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251363182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:无创、非消融的电容式和电阻式射频已经成为治疗盆腔疼痛的一种治疗工具。然而,对其治疗盆底功能障碍的疗效研究有限。本研究旨在评估电容式和电阻式射频治疗原发性痛经的有效性。方法:采用随机、单盲、对照试验。纳入了45名医学诊断为原发性痛经的未生育妇女。参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组:经腹射频、腔内射频或对照组。干预组接受9次20分钟的疗程,月经周期间隔3周,每周3次。在基线、干预后和1个月随访时评估疼痛强度、月经生活质量、一般生活质量和疼痛压力阈值。结果:与对照组相比,经腹和腔内射频治疗均能显著减轻疼痛强度(p < 0.001)。腔内射频治疗比经腹射频治疗更有效,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.311)。各组间各压点机械敏感性差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,腔内组月经生活质量明显改善(p = 0.023),而经腹组无明显改善(p = 0.176)。两组患者总体生活质量的变化均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:经腹和腔内射频治疗均能在短期内减轻原发性痛经患者的疼痛强度。由于两种治疗方式之间的疗效没有显著差异,因此可以根据患者的偏好和耐受性进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Radiofrequency in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Noninvasive, nonablative capacitive and resistive radiofrequency has emerged as a therapeutic tool for managing pelvic pain. However, research on its efficacy in pelvic floor dysfunctions is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of capacitive and resistive radiofrequency therapy for primary dysmenorrhea. Methods: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial was conducted. Forty-five nulliparous women with a medical diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: transabdominal radiofrequency, intracavitary radiofrequency, or control. The intervention groups received nine 20-min sessions, with 3 sessions per week over 3 weeks between menstrual cycles. Pain intensity, menstrual quality of life, general quality of life, and pain pressure thresholds were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and at 1-month follow-up. Results: Both transabdominal and intracavitary radiofrequency significantly reduced pain intensity compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Intracavitary radiofrequency achieved a greater reduction than transabdominal, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.311). No significant between-group differences were observed in mechanical sensitivity (p > 0.05) across all pressure points. Menstrual quality of life significantly improved in the intracavitary group compared with the control (p = 0.023), whereas the transabdominal group showed no significant improvement (p = 0.176). Changes in general quality of life were not statistically significant in any group (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both transabdominal and intracavitary radiofrequency therapies produced short-term reduction in pain intensity in women with primary dysmenorrhea. As the efficacy between modalities did not differ significantly, treatment could be tailored to patient preference and tolerability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信