Kato-Katz、pocc - cca和real-time PCR在埃塞俄比亚西北部不同流行环境中检测曼氏血吸虫感染的比较性能:一项横断面研究

IF 3.5 Q1 TROPICAL MEDICINE
Getaneh Alemu, Endalkachew Nibret, Abaineh Munshea, Melaku Anegagrie, María Flores-Chávez, Tadesse Hailu, Arancha Amor
{"title":"Kato-Katz、pocc - cca和real-time PCR在埃塞俄比亚西北部不同流行环境中检测曼氏血吸虫感染的比较性能:一项横断面研究","authors":"Getaneh Alemu, Endalkachew Nibret, Abaineh Munshea, Melaku Anegagrie, María Flores-Chávez, Tadesse Hailu, Arancha Amor","doi":"10.1186/s41182-025-00777-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective detection of Schistosoma mansoni is crucial for the control and management of the infection. This study aimed to evaluate the field performance of three diagnostic methods-point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) assay, Kato-Katz (KK) technique, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-for detecting S. mansoni infection in different transmission settings across northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February to June 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara Regional State of Ethiopia, involving 1192 randomly selected participants. Stool samples were analyzed using the KK technique and RT-PCR, while urine samples were tested using the POC-CCA cassette. The performance of POC-CCA and RT-PCR was evaluated against a KK reference standard across varying transmission areas. In addition, diagnostic accuracy for all three methods was assessed using latent class analysis (LCA) with Mplus software. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa statistics were calculated using the Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA) online tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The KK method showed the lowest prevalence (33.4%) and demonstrated reduced sensitivity, particularly in low (54.6%) and moderate (67.0%) transmission areas, though it performed better (88.6%) in high-endemic settings compared to LCA reference. In contrast, the POC-CCA test showed higher prevalence (53.5%) and consistently high sensitivity (93.4-100%) across transmission settings, although its specificity declined in low (86.0%) and moderate (78.9%) endemic areas against LCA. Compared to the KK gold standard, POC-CCA had high sensitivity (93.5%) and NPV (95.3%) but lower specificity (62.5%) and moderate agreement (kappa = 0.52). RT-PCR exhibited strong diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity against both KK (93.5%) and LCA (97.2%) but declining specificity as endemicity increased (84.2% in low, 79.4% in moderate and 28.0% in high-endemic areas), and showed substantial agreement with LCA (kappa = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The KK demonstrates low sensitivity, particularly in low-transmission settings. Both the POC-CCA test and RT-PCR show good performance for detecting S. mansoni infection. However, due to its complexity and resource requirements, RT-PCR is not feasible for routine field use. Therefore, we recommend the adoption of the POC-CCA test in Ethiopia's SCH control and elimination programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":"53 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative performance of Kato-Katz, POC-CCA and real-time PCR in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection at different endemicity settings in northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Getaneh Alemu, Endalkachew Nibret, Abaineh Munshea, Melaku Anegagrie, María Flores-Chávez, Tadesse Hailu, Arancha Amor\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41182-025-00777-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective detection of Schistosoma mansoni is crucial for the control and management of the infection. This study aimed to evaluate the field performance of three diagnostic methods-point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) assay, Kato-Katz (KK) technique, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-for detecting S. mansoni infection in different transmission settings across northwest Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February to June 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara Regional State of Ethiopia, involving 1192 randomly selected participants. Stool samples were analyzed using the KK technique and RT-PCR, while urine samples were tested using the POC-CCA cassette. The performance of POC-CCA and RT-PCR was evaluated against a KK reference standard across varying transmission areas. In addition, diagnostic accuracy for all three methods was assessed using latent class analysis (LCA) with Mplus software. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa statistics were calculated using the Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA) online tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The KK method showed the lowest prevalence (33.4%) and demonstrated reduced sensitivity, particularly in low (54.6%) and moderate (67.0%) transmission areas, though it performed better (88.6%) in high-endemic settings compared to LCA reference. In contrast, the POC-CCA test showed higher prevalence (53.5%) and consistently high sensitivity (93.4-100%) across transmission settings, although its specificity declined in low (86.0%) and moderate (78.9%) endemic areas against LCA. Compared to the KK gold standard, POC-CCA had high sensitivity (93.5%) and NPV (95.3%) but lower specificity (62.5%) and moderate agreement (kappa = 0.52). RT-PCR exhibited strong diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity against both KK (93.5%) and LCA (97.2%) but declining specificity as endemicity increased (84.2% in low, 79.4% in moderate and 28.0% in high-endemic areas), and showed substantial agreement with LCA (kappa = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The KK demonstrates low sensitivity, particularly in low-transmission settings. Both the POC-CCA test and RT-PCR show good performance for detecting S. mansoni infection. However, due to its complexity and resource requirements, RT-PCR is not feasible for routine field use. Therefore, we recommend the adoption of the POC-CCA test in Ethiopia's SCH control and elimination programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine and Health\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00777-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TROPICAL MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00777-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效的曼氏血吸虫检测对曼氏血吸虫感染的控制和管理至关重要。本研究旨在评估三种诊断方法的现场性能,即护理点循环阴极抗原(POC-CCA)测定、Kato-Katz (KK)技术和实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR),用于检测埃塞俄比亚西北部不同传播环境中的曼氏沙门氏菌感染。方法:于2023年2月至6月在埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区州进行横断面研究,随机选择1192名参与者。粪便样本采用KK技术和RT-PCR进行分析,尿液样本采用POC-CCA盒进行检测。POC-CCA和RT-PCR的性能根据KK参考标准在不同的传播区域进行评估。此外,使用Mplus软件的潜在分类分析(LCA)评估所有三种方法的诊断准确性。使用简单交互统计分析(SISA)在线工具计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和kappa统计量。结果:KK方法的流行率最低(33.4%),敏感性降低,特别是在低(54.6%)和中度(67.0%)传播地区,尽管与LCA参考相比,它在高流行环境中的表现更好(88.6%)。相比之下,POC-CCA测试在传播环境中显示出更高的患病率(53.5%)和一贯的高灵敏度(93.4-100%),尽管其特异性在LCA低流行区(86.0%)和中度流行区(78.9%)下降。与KK金标准相比,POC-CCA具有较高的灵敏度(93.5%)和NPV(95.3%),但特异性较低(62.5%),一致性中等(kappa = 0.52)。RT-PCR表现出较强的诊断能力,对KK(93.5%)和LCA(97.2%)均有较高的敏感性,但随着地方病的增加特异性下降(低地方病为84.2%,中度地方病为79.4%,高地方病为28.0%),与LCA (kappa = 0.75)基本一致。结论:KK显示低灵敏度,特别是在低传输设置。pocc - cca检测和RT-PCR检测对曼氏梭菌感染均有较好的检测效果。然而,由于其复杂性和资源需求,RT-PCR不适合常规的现场应用。因此,我们建议在埃塞俄比亚的SCH控制和消除项目中采用pocc - cca测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative performance of Kato-Katz, POC-CCA and real-time PCR in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection at different endemicity settings in northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Comparative performance of Kato-Katz, POC-CCA and real-time PCR in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection at different endemicity settings in northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Comparative performance of Kato-Katz, POC-CCA and real-time PCR in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection at different endemicity settings in northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Comparative performance of Kato-Katz, POC-CCA and real-time PCR in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection at different endemicity settings in northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Effective detection of Schistosoma mansoni is crucial for the control and management of the infection. This study aimed to evaluate the field performance of three diagnostic methods-point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) assay, Kato-Katz (KK) technique, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-for detecting S. mansoni infection in different transmission settings across northwest Ethiopia.

Methods: From February to June 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in the Amhara Regional State of Ethiopia, involving 1192 randomly selected participants. Stool samples were analyzed using the KK technique and RT-PCR, while urine samples were tested using the POC-CCA cassette. The performance of POC-CCA and RT-PCR was evaluated against a KK reference standard across varying transmission areas. In addition, diagnostic accuracy for all three methods was assessed using latent class analysis (LCA) with Mplus software. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa statistics were calculated using the Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA) online tool.

Results: The KK method showed the lowest prevalence (33.4%) and demonstrated reduced sensitivity, particularly in low (54.6%) and moderate (67.0%) transmission areas, though it performed better (88.6%) in high-endemic settings compared to LCA reference. In contrast, the POC-CCA test showed higher prevalence (53.5%) and consistently high sensitivity (93.4-100%) across transmission settings, although its specificity declined in low (86.0%) and moderate (78.9%) endemic areas against LCA. Compared to the KK gold standard, POC-CCA had high sensitivity (93.5%) and NPV (95.3%) but lower specificity (62.5%) and moderate agreement (kappa = 0.52). RT-PCR exhibited strong diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity against both KK (93.5%) and LCA (97.2%) but declining specificity as endemicity increased (84.2% in low, 79.4% in moderate and 28.0% in high-endemic areas), and showed substantial agreement with LCA (kappa = 0.75).

Conclusions: The KK demonstrates low sensitivity, particularly in low-transmission settings. Both the POC-CCA test and RT-PCR show good performance for detecting S. mansoni infection. However, due to its complexity and resource requirements, RT-PCR is not feasible for routine field use. Therefore, we recommend the adoption of the POC-CCA test in Ethiopia's SCH control and elimination programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Health
Tropical Medicine and Health TROPICAL MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信