{"title":"基于序列特异性寡核苷酸探针的luminex多重试剂盒与新一代测序检测子宫内膜癌中POLE致癌突变的比较","authors":"Mayumi Kobayashi Kato, Takayuki Kawai, Hideki Okada, Takuya Kondo, Tetsuro Shiraishi, Maiko Yamaguchi, Daiki Higuchi, Masaaki Komatsu, Ryuji Hamamoto, Koji Matumoto, Yasuhisa Terao, Tomoyasu Kato, Takashi Kohno, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Kouya Shiraishi, Hiroshi Yoshida","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04204-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In endometrial cancer, detection of oncogenic mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene is crucial for accurate staging according to the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification and for minimizing overtreatment. However, POLE sequencing is expensive, time-consuming, and often inaccessible in settings without specialized equipment. We developed a novel multiplex kit for the detection of POLE mutations using a Luminex (xMAP) assay in a single reaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the multiplex kit for routine clinical samples and compare it with that of conventional next-generation sequencing (NGS). Hysterectomy specimens and endometrial biopsies were collected at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1999 and 2023. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Both the Luminex (xMAP)-based multiplex kit and NGS targeting all POLE exons were used. Concordance was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Of the 502 samples, 432 were hysterectomy specimens and 70 were biopsies. In the surgical samples, both the Luminex (xMAP)-based kit and NGS detected 52 POLE mutations (12.0%) with perfect concordance (κ = 1.000). In the biopsies, 33 POLE mutations were identified using both methods, with complete concordance. Notably, the Luminex (xMAP)-based kit successfully analyzed all 28 samples that failed NGS quality control and detected four cases with POLE mutations. The Luminex (xMAP)-based kit demonstrates high concordance with NGS for the detection of POLE mutations. With further external validation, this kit could become a reliable and accessible alternative to NGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between a Luminex-based multiplex kit with a sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe and next-generation sequencing for the detection of POLE oncogenic mutations in endometrial cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mayumi Kobayashi Kato, Takayuki Kawai, Hideki Okada, Takuya Kondo, Tetsuro Shiraishi, Maiko Yamaguchi, Daiki Higuchi, Masaaki Komatsu, Ryuji Hamamoto, Koji Matumoto, Yasuhisa Terao, Tomoyasu Kato, Takashi Kohno, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Kouya Shiraishi, Hiroshi Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-025-04204-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In endometrial cancer, detection of oncogenic mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene is crucial for accurate staging according to the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification and for minimizing overtreatment. However, POLE sequencing is expensive, time-consuming, and often inaccessible in settings without specialized equipment. We developed a novel multiplex kit for the detection of POLE mutations using a Luminex (xMAP) assay in a single reaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the multiplex kit for routine clinical samples and compare it with that of conventional next-generation sequencing (NGS). Hysterectomy specimens and endometrial biopsies were collected at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1999 and 2023. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Both the Luminex (xMAP)-based multiplex kit and NGS targeting all POLE exons were used. Concordance was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Of the 502 samples, 432 were hysterectomy specimens and 70 were biopsies. In the surgical samples, both the Luminex (xMAP)-based kit and NGS detected 52 POLE mutations (12.0%) with perfect concordance (κ = 1.000). In the biopsies, 33 POLE mutations were identified using both methods, with complete concordance. Notably, the Luminex (xMAP)-based kit successfully analyzed all 28 samples that failed NGS quality control and detected four cases with POLE mutations. The Luminex (xMAP)-based kit demonstrates high concordance with NGS for the detection of POLE mutations. With further external validation, this kit could become a reliable and accessible alternative to NGS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04204-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04204-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between a Luminex-based multiplex kit with a sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe and next-generation sequencing for the detection of POLE oncogenic mutations in endometrial cancer.
In endometrial cancer, detection of oncogenic mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene is crucial for accurate staging according to the 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification and for minimizing overtreatment. However, POLE sequencing is expensive, time-consuming, and often inaccessible in settings without specialized equipment. We developed a novel multiplex kit for the detection of POLE mutations using a Luminex (xMAP) assay in a single reaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the multiplex kit for routine clinical samples and compare it with that of conventional next-generation sequencing (NGS). Hysterectomy specimens and endometrial biopsies were collected at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1999 and 2023. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Both the Luminex (xMAP)-based multiplex kit and NGS targeting all POLE exons were used. Concordance was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Of the 502 samples, 432 were hysterectomy specimens and 70 were biopsies. In the surgical samples, both the Luminex (xMAP)-based kit and NGS detected 52 POLE mutations (12.0%) with perfect concordance (κ = 1.000). In the biopsies, 33 POLE mutations were identified using both methods, with complete concordance. Notably, the Luminex (xMAP)-based kit successfully analyzed all 28 samples that failed NGS quality control and detected four cases with POLE mutations. The Luminex (xMAP)-based kit demonstrates high concordance with NGS for the detection of POLE mutations. With further external validation, this kit could become a reliable and accessible alternative to NGS.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.