超宽视场荧光素血管造影对糖尿病视网膜病变诊断和治疗的影响。

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nicole K Scripsema, Tala Al-Khaled, Amy Song, Joelle A Hallak, Rawan Allozi, Aziz A Khanifar, Thanos D Papakostas, Christina Y Weng, Ronald C Gentile, J Peter Campbell, Jessica G Lee, Gennady Landa, Felix Y Chau, William F Mieler, Meenakashi Gupta, Amani A Fawzi, Judy E Kim, Jennifer I Lim, Robison Vernon Paul Chan
{"title":"超宽视场荧光素血管造影对糖尿病视网膜病变诊断和治疗的影响。","authors":"Nicole K Scripsema, Tala Al-Khaled, Amy Song, Joelle A Hallak, Rawan Allozi, Aziz A Khanifar, Thanos D Papakostas, Christina Y Weng, Ronald C Gentile, J Peter Campbell, Jessica G Lee, Gennady Landa, Felix Y Chau, William F Mieler, Meenakashi Gupta, Amani A Fawzi, Judy E Kim, Jennifer I Lim, Robison Vernon Paul Chan","doi":"10.1177/24741264251359907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To study the influence of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) on the diagnosis and management of diabetic retinopathy (DR). <b>Methods:</b> Ten experts in DR completed an online survey in which they were asked to diagnose and manage DR cases using different imaging modalities. Experts independently reviewed 20 cases of DR and provided a diagnosis and management plan for each case, first based on ultra-widefield color-free and red-free images alone and again with the corresponding ultra-widefield FA images. Experts were polled on their diagnostic confidence, use of FA in clinical practice, and opinions on the value of ultra-widefield FA. Based on the reference standard diagnosis, primary outcomes included diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with and without ultra-widefield FA. Secondary outcomes included intergrader agreement, expert confidence, management outcomes, and an analysis of experts' opinions on the clinical use of ultra-widefield FA. <b>Results:</b> Diagnostic sensitivity (95% CI) increased from 36% (29%-43%) to 69% (62%-75%) (<i>P</i> < .05) with ultra-widefield FA. Intergrader agreement (Fleiss kappa statistic, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.21-0.27] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.40-0.47]; <i>P</i> < .05) and expert confidence (38% vs 65%) also improved. In 39% of responses, management was changed from observation to treatment. Although 40% of experts did not request FA with the initial ultra-widefield color-free/red-free images, 80% found ultra-widefield FA clinically useful when provided. <b>Conclusions:</b> Diagnosis, treatment, and expert opinions on the use of FA all changed when a corresponding ultra-widefield FA was available. Incorporating FA into routine clinical practice may facilitate more accurate clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251359907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Ultra-Wide field Fluorescein Angiography on the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole K Scripsema, Tala Al-Khaled, Amy Song, Joelle A Hallak, Rawan Allozi, Aziz A Khanifar, Thanos D Papakostas, Christina Y Weng, Ronald C Gentile, J Peter Campbell, Jessica G Lee, Gennady Landa, Felix Y Chau, William F Mieler, Meenakashi Gupta, Amani A Fawzi, Judy E Kim, Jennifer I Lim, Robison Vernon Paul Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24741264251359907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To study the influence of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) on the diagnosis and management of diabetic retinopathy (DR). <b>Methods:</b> Ten experts in DR completed an online survey in which they were asked to diagnose and manage DR cases using different imaging modalities. Experts independently reviewed 20 cases of DR and provided a diagnosis and management plan for each case, first based on ultra-widefield color-free and red-free images alone and again with the corresponding ultra-widefield FA images. Experts were polled on their diagnostic confidence, use of FA in clinical practice, and opinions on the value of ultra-widefield FA. Based on the reference standard diagnosis, primary outcomes included diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with and without ultra-widefield FA. Secondary outcomes included intergrader agreement, expert confidence, management outcomes, and an analysis of experts' opinions on the clinical use of ultra-widefield FA. <b>Results:</b> Diagnostic sensitivity (95% CI) increased from 36% (29%-43%) to 69% (62%-75%) (<i>P</i> < .05) with ultra-widefield FA. Intergrader agreement (Fleiss kappa statistic, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.21-0.27] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.40-0.47]; <i>P</i> < .05) and expert confidence (38% vs 65%) also improved. In 39% of responses, management was changed from observation to treatment. Although 40% of experts did not request FA with the initial ultra-widefield color-free/red-free images, 80% found ultra-widefield FA clinically useful when provided. <b>Conclusions:</b> Diagnosis, treatment, and expert opinions on the use of FA all changed when a corresponding ultra-widefield FA was available. Incorporating FA into routine clinical practice may facilitate more accurate clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24741264251359907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251359907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251359907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨超宽视场荧光素血管造影(FA)对糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)诊断和治疗的影响。方法:10位DR专家完成了一项在线调查,要求他们使用不同的成像方式诊断和处理DR病例。专家独立审查了20例DR,并为每个病例提供了诊断和管理方案,首先单独基于超宽视场无彩色和无红色图像,然后再结合相应的超宽视场FA图像。专家们对他们的诊断信心,在临床实践中使用FA,以及对超宽视场FA的价值的意见进行了投票。根据参考标准诊断,主要结局包括诊断敏感性和特异性,有无超宽视场FA。次要结果包括评分者的一致意见、专家的信心、管理结果以及专家对超宽视场FA临床应用的意见分析。结果:超宽视场FA的诊断敏感性(95% CI)从36%(29% ~ 43%)提高到69% (62% ~ 75%)(P < 0.05)。评分者一致性(Fleiss kappa统计值,0.29 [95% CI, 0.21-0.27] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.40-0.47];P结论:当有相应的超宽视场FA时,诊断、治疗和专家对FA使用的意见都发生了变化。将FA纳入常规临床实践可能有助于更准确的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Ultra-Wide field Fluorescein Angiography on the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Purpose: To study the influence of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) on the diagnosis and management of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: Ten experts in DR completed an online survey in which they were asked to diagnose and manage DR cases using different imaging modalities. Experts independently reviewed 20 cases of DR and provided a diagnosis and management plan for each case, first based on ultra-widefield color-free and red-free images alone and again with the corresponding ultra-widefield FA images. Experts were polled on their diagnostic confidence, use of FA in clinical practice, and opinions on the value of ultra-widefield FA. Based on the reference standard diagnosis, primary outcomes included diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with and without ultra-widefield FA. Secondary outcomes included intergrader agreement, expert confidence, management outcomes, and an analysis of experts' opinions on the clinical use of ultra-widefield FA. Results: Diagnostic sensitivity (95% CI) increased from 36% (29%-43%) to 69% (62%-75%) (P < .05) with ultra-widefield FA. Intergrader agreement (Fleiss kappa statistic, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.21-0.27] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.40-0.47]; P < .05) and expert confidence (38% vs 65%) also improved. In 39% of responses, management was changed from observation to treatment. Although 40% of experts did not request FA with the initial ultra-widefield color-free/red-free images, 80% found ultra-widefield FA clinically useful when provided. Conclusions: Diagnosis, treatment, and expert opinions on the use of FA all changed when a corresponding ultra-widefield FA was available. Incorporating FA into routine clinical practice may facilitate more accurate clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信