通往职业风险评估目标的许多途径:来自从业者对话的见解。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andrew Maier, Taylor Burnham, Paul DeLeo, Heather Lynch
{"title":"通往职业风险评估目标的许多途径:来自从业者对话的见解。","authors":"Andrew Maier, Taylor Burnham, Paul DeLeo, Heather Lynch","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2529978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing and minimizing potential health risks from chemical exposure in the workplace is a crucial role for an industrial hygiene professional. It is also a core objective for government agencies conducting research, developing guidance, and enforcing laws to protect occupational populations. The specific methods for occupational risk assessment-and in some cases, the sophistication of these methods-are evolving in the face of emerging technologies and changing regulations. Occupational health risks identified in recent agency assessments have led to increased dialogue among stakeholders and agencies regarding foundational practices and opportunities for standardizing a baseline methodology that can be made fit-for-purpose for specific programs. In response, the Foundation for Chemistry Research and Initiatives (FCRI) and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)<sup>®</sup> jointly initiated a workshop series with an overall objective to facilitate conversations and knowledge-sharing regarding best practices for occupational risk assessment. This review summarizes the major topics discussed at the workshops and presents key guidance documents and other resources identified during and following the series. Specific topics discussed included: (1) foundational practices for collecting empirical industrial hygiene data, (2) optimizing use of near-field exposure models, (3) improving dermal exposure assessment, and (4) developing and applying occupational exposure limits for risk management. An overarching theme across the series was that while there often is no single best method, the goals of the assessment must be considered when selecting the methods and tools for each assessment. In other words, the nature of the question or issue that the risk assessor is addressing in the assessment must be defined and considered before starting the assessment and throughout its entirety, including when interpreting the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Many paths to one goal for occupational risk assessment: Insights from a practitioner dialogue.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Maier, Taylor Burnham, Paul DeLeo, Heather Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15459624.2025.2529978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing and minimizing potential health risks from chemical exposure in the workplace is a crucial role for an industrial hygiene professional. It is also a core objective for government agencies conducting research, developing guidance, and enforcing laws to protect occupational populations. The specific methods for occupational risk assessment-and in some cases, the sophistication of these methods-are evolving in the face of emerging technologies and changing regulations. Occupational health risks identified in recent agency assessments have led to increased dialogue among stakeholders and agencies regarding foundational practices and opportunities for standardizing a baseline methodology that can be made fit-for-purpose for specific programs. In response, the Foundation for Chemistry Research and Initiatives (FCRI) and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)<sup>®</sup> jointly initiated a workshop series with an overall objective to facilitate conversations and knowledge-sharing regarding best practices for occupational risk assessment. This review summarizes the major topics discussed at the workshops and presents key guidance documents and other resources identified during and following the series. Specific topics discussed included: (1) foundational practices for collecting empirical industrial hygiene data, (2) optimizing use of near-field exposure models, (3) improving dermal exposure assessment, and (4) developing and applying occupational exposure limits for risk management. An overarching theme across the series was that while there often is no single best method, the goals of the assessment must be considered when selecting the methods and tools for each assessment. In other words, the nature of the question or issue that the risk assessor is addressing in the assessment must be defined and considered before starting the assessment and throughout its entirety, including when interpreting the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2529978\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2529978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对工业卫生专业人员来说,评估和尽量减少工作场所接触化学品的潜在健康风险是至关重要的。这也是政府机构开展研究、制定指导和执行法律以保护职业人群的核心目标。职业风险评估的具体方法——在某些情况下,这些方法的复杂性——正在面对新兴技术和不断变化的法规而不断发展。在最近的机构评估中确定的职业健康风险导致利益攸关方和机构之间就基本做法和标准化基线方法的机会进行了更多的对话,这些方法可以适用于具体方案。作为回应,化学研究与倡议基金会(FCRI)和美国工业卫生协会(AIHA)®联合发起了一系列研讨会,其总体目标是促进有关职业风险评估最佳实践的对话和知识共享。本综述总结了研讨会上讨论的主要主题,并介绍了系列会议期间和之后确定的关键指导文件和其他资源。具体讨论的主题包括:(1)收集工业卫生经验数据的基础实践;(2)优化近场暴露模型的使用;(3)改进皮肤暴露评估;(4)制定和应用职业暴露限值进行风险管理。贯穿本系列的一个主要主题是,虽然通常没有单一的最佳方法,但是在为每个评估选择方法和工具时必须考虑评估的目标。换句话说,风险评估人员在评估中处理的问题或问题的性质必须在开始评估之前以及在整个评估过程中进行定义和考虑,包括在解释结果时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Many paths to one goal for occupational risk assessment: Insights from a practitioner dialogue.

Assessing and minimizing potential health risks from chemical exposure in the workplace is a crucial role for an industrial hygiene professional. It is also a core objective for government agencies conducting research, developing guidance, and enforcing laws to protect occupational populations. The specific methods for occupational risk assessment-and in some cases, the sophistication of these methods-are evolving in the face of emerging technologies and changing regulations. Occupational health risks identified in recent agency assessments have led to increased dialogue among stakeholders and agencies regarding foundational practices and opportunities for standardizing a baseline methodology that can be made fit-for-purpose for specific programs. In response, the Foundation for Chemistry Research and Initiatives (FCRI) and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)® jointly initiated a workshop series with an overall objective to facilitate conversations and knowledge-sharing regarding best practices for occupational risk assessment. This review summarizes the major topics discussed at the workshops and presents key guidance documents and other resources identified during and following the series. Specific topics discussed included: (1) foundational practices for collecting empirical industrial hygiene data, (2) optimizing use of near-field exposure models, (3) improving dermal exposure assessment, and (4) developing and applying occupational exposure limits for risk management. An overarching theme across the series was that while there often is no single best method, the goals of the assessment must be considered when selecting the methods and tools for each assessment. In other words, the nature of the question or issue that the risk assessor is addressing in the assessment must be defined and considered before starting the assessment and throughout its entirety, including when interpreting the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信