颈动脉支架置入血管内碎石治疗钙化性颈动脉狭窄:系统文献综述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1177/03000605251343871
Alexander R Evans, Adaira R Reid, Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Mary K Gumerlock, Hakeem J Shakir
{"title":"颈动脉支架置入血管内碎石治疗钙化性颈动脉狭窄:系统文献综述。","authors":"Alexander R Evans, Adaira R Reid, Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Mary K Gumerlock, Hakeem J Shakir","doi":"10.1177/03000605251343871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundEndovascular techniques such as stenting, endarterectomy, and transcarotid arterial revascularization are common therapeutic options in the management of carotid artery stenosis; however, they involve a risk of major complications (e.g. in-hospital transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke). The application of shock wave therapy in the form of intravascular lithotripsy has been increasingly explored among patients with calcified arterial lesions. To the best of our knowledge, the diverse applications of intravascular lithotripsy have been documented in the context of peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and transcarotid arterial revascularization; however, limited research has been conducted on other domains of endovascular management. In this systematic review, we aimed to elucidate the complication profile and document the safety of off-label intravascular lithotripsy prior to carotid artery stenting for calcific carotid artery stenosis.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, in which the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus were searched to identify all cases of reported carotid artery stenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy in conjunction with carotid artery stenting.ResultsOf the 711 initially identified articles, 7 were selected because they met the study criteria. Finally, 11 patients aged 56-82 years were included in our review. The prevalence of preoperative stenosis ranged from 60% to 95%; postoperative vessel patency was described in all cases. In the postoperative period, one patient experienced transient right eye blindness secondary to central retinal artery occlusion and another patient sustained a left hemispheric transient ischemic attack.ConclusionWe explored the application of intravascular lithotripsy in carotid artery stenting procedures, in which success in improving lumen patency has been documented. Although postoperative complications such as transient ischemic attack have been reported, all patients exhibited good clinical outcomes, with no new permanent deficits being observed. Our findings cautiously recommend the use of intravascular lithotripsy as an adjunct to carotid artery stenting in the management of calcific carotid stenosis as a safe therapeutic option in selected patients. However, further research on this subject is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 8","pages":"3000605251343871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander R Evans, Adaira R Reid, Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Mary K Gumerlock, Hakeem J Shakir\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605251343871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundEndovascular techniques such as stenting, endarterectomy, and transcarotid arterial revascularization are common therapeutic options in the management of carotid artery stenosis; however, they involve a risk of major complications (e.g. in-hospital transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke). The application of shock wave therapy in the form of intravascular lithotripsy has been increasingly explored among patients with calcified arterial lesions. To the best of our knowledge, the diverse applications of intravascular lithotripsy have been documented in the context of peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and transcarotid arterial revascularization; however, limited research has been conducted on other domains of endovascular management. In this systematic review, we aimed to elucidate the complication profile and document the safety of off-label intravascular lithotripsy prior to carotid artery stenting for calcific carotid artery stenosis.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, in which the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus were searched to identify all cases of reported carotid artery stenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy in conjunction with carotid artery stenting.ResultsOf the 711 initially identified articles, 7 were selected because they met the study criteria. Finally, 11 patients aged 56-82 years were included in our review. The prevalence of preoperative stenosis ranged from 60% to 95%; postoperative vessel patency was described in all cases. In the postoperative period, one patient experienced transient right eye blindness secondary to central retinal artery occlusion and another patient sustained a left hemispheric transient ischemic attack.ConclusionWe explored the application of intravascular lithotripsy in carotid artery stenting procedures, in which success in improving lumen patency has been documented. Although postoperative complications such as transient ischemic attack have been reported, all patients exhibited good clinical outcomes, with no new permanent deficits being observed. Our findings cautiously recommend the use of intravascular lithotripsy as an adjunct to carotid artery stenting in the management of calcific carotid stenosis as a safe therapeutic option in selected patients. However, further research on this subject is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"53 8\",\"pages\":\"3000605251343871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251343871\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251343871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管支架置入术、动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术等血管技术是治疗颈动脉狭窄的常用治疗方法;然而,它们涉及重大并发症的风险(例如,院内短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血性中风)。在钙化动脉病变患者中,冲击波治疗以血管内碎石的形式被越来越多地探索。据我们所知,在外周动脉疾病、冠状动脉疾病和经颈动脉血运重建术的背景下,血管内碎石术的各种应用已被记录在案;然而,对血管内管理的其他领域的研究有限。在这篇系统综述中,我们的目的是阐明并发症的情况,并证明在钙化性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术前进行超说明书血管内碎石术的安全性。方法根据系统评价和meta分析2020指南的首选报告项目,检索PubMed、CINAHL、Embase和Scopus数据库,对所有报道的颈动脉狭窄行血管内碎石联合颈动脉支架置入术的病例进行系统文献综述。在最初确定的711篇文章中,有7篇因为符合研究标准而被选中。最后,11例年龄在56-82岁的患者纳入了我们的研究。术前狭窄的发生率为60% ~ 95%;所有病例均描述了术后血管通畅。术后1例患者继发于视网膜中央动脉闭塞的短暂性右眼失明,1例患者发生左半球短暂性脑缺血发作。结论我们探索了血管内碎石在颈动脉支架手术中的应用,在改善管腔通畅方面取得了成功。虽然有术后并发症如短暂性脑缺血发作的报道,但所有患者均表现出良好的临床结果,未观察到新的永久性缺陷。我们的研究结果谨慎地推荐使用血管内碎石作为颈动脉支架置入术治疗钙化性颈动脉狭窄的辅助手段,作为一种安全的治疗选择。然而,对这个问题的进一步研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

BackgroundEndovascular techniques such as stenting, endarterectomy, and transcarotid arterial revascularization are common therapeutic options in the management of carotid artery stenosis; however, they involve a risk of major complications (e.g. in-hospital transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke). The application of shock wave therapy in the form of intravascular lithotripsy has been increasingly explored among patients with calcified arterial lesions. To the best of our knowledge, the diverse applications of intravascular lithotripsy have been documented in the context of peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and transcarotid arterial revascularization; however, limited research has been conducted on other domains of endovascular management. In this systematic review, we aimed to elucidate the complication profile and document the safety of off-label intravascular lithotripsy prior to carotid artery stenting for calcific carotid artery stenosis.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, in which the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus were searched to identify all cases of reported carotid artery stenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy in conjunction with carotid artery stenting.ResultsOf the 711 initially identified articles, 7 were selected because they met the study criteria. Finally, 11 patients aged 56-82 years were included in our review. The prevalence of preoperative stenosis ranged from 60% to 95%; postoperative vessel patency was described in all cases. In the postoperative period, one patient experienced transient right eye blindness secondary to central retinal artery occlusion and another patient sustained a left hemispheric transient ischemic attack.ConclusionWe explored the application of intravascular lithotripsy in carotid artery stenting procedures, in which success in improving lumen patency has been documented. Although postoperative complications such as transient ischemic attack have been reported, all patients exhibited good clinical outcomes, with no new permanent deficits being observed. Our findings cautiously recommend the use of intravascular lithotripsy as an adjunct to carotid artery stenting in the management of calcific carotid stenosis as a safe therapeutic option in selected patients. However, further research on this subject is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信