{"title":"当ChatGPT谈论健康:检查对人工智能作为健康信息源的温暖和能力的看法。","authors":"Buduo Wang, Bruce Wang Shibo, Jiwan Kafle","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2025.2540864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research indicates that a majority of individuals (78.4%) are willing to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for health-related purposes. However, how individuals perceive and evaluate AI as a source of health information remains less understood. Drawing on literature from AI aversion and the stereotype content model, this study compares perceptions of warmth and competence between ChatGPT and human doctors. Results indicate that when delivering the same health information on moderate drinking, ChatGPT is perceived as less warm and competent than human doctors. This perception further leads to decreased intentions to share the information. Additionally, we examine the moderating effect of prior AI exposure, finding that discrepancies in perceived warmth and competence disappear for those with extensive AI exposure. Individuals with substantial AI experience perceive similar levels of warmth and competence and are equally likely to share health information from ChatGPT as from a human doctor.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When ChatGPT Speaks About Health: Examining Perceptions of Warmth and Competence Toward AI as a Health Information Source.\",\"authors\":\"Buduo Wang, Bruce Wang Shibo, Jiwan Kafle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10810730.2025.2540864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent research indicates that a majority of individuals (78.4%) are willing to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for health-related purposes. However, how individuals perceive and evaluate AI as a source of health information remains less understood. Drawing on literature from AI aversion and the stereotype content model, this study compares perceptions of warmth and competence between ChatGPT and human doctors. Results indicate that when delivering the same health information on moderate drinking, ChatGPT is perceived as less warm and competent than human doctors. This perception further leads to decreased intentions to share the information. Additionally, we examine the moderating effect of prior AI exposure, finding that discrepancies in perceived warmth and competence disappear for those with extensive AI exposure. Individuals with substantial AI experience perceive similar levels of warmth and competence and are equally likely to share health information from ChatGPT as from a human doctor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2540864\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2540864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
When ChatGPT Speaks About Health: Examining Perceptions of Warmth and Competence Toward AI as a Health Information Source.
Recent research indicates that a majority of individuals (78.4%) are willing to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for health-related purposes. However, how individuals perceive and evaluate AI as a source of health information remains less understood. Drawing on literature from AI aversion and the stereotype content model, this study compares perceptions of warmth and competence between ChatGPT and human doctors. Results indicate that when delivering the same health information on moderate drinking, ChatGPT is perceived as less warm and competent than human doctors. This perception further leads to decreased intentions to share the information. Additionally, we examine the moderating effect of prior AI exposure, finding that discrepancies in perceived warmth and competence disappear for those with extensive AI exposure. Individuals with substantial AI experience perceive similar levels of warmth and competence and are equally likely to share health information from ChatGPT as from a human doctor.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.