多标记方法:急诊科入院患者风险分层的有效工具。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Marilena Minieri, Carla Prezioso, Dolores Limongi, Vito N. Di Lecce, Maria Stella Lia, Alessandro Terrinoni, Alfredo Giovannelli, Gianluigi Ferrazza, Cartesio D'Agostini, Sergio Bernardini, Jacopo M. Legramante
{"title":"多标记方法:急诊科入院患者风险分层的有效工具。","authors":"Marilena Minieri,&nbsp;Carla Prezioso,&nbsp;Dolores Limongi,&nbsp;Vito N. Di Lecce,&nbsp;Maria Stella Lia,&nbsp;Alessandro Terrinoni,&nbsp;Alfredo Giovannelli,&nbsp;Gianluigi Ferrazza,&nbsp;Cartesio D'Agostini,&nbsp;Sergio Bernardini,&nbsp;Jacopo M. Legramante","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The use of biomarkers in emergency room decision-making has significantly increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to urgent clinical needs. SARS-CoV-2 infection presents a spectrum of symptoms, from asymptomatic cases to severe pneumonia with respiratory failure. During the pandemic, various prognostic tools and biomarkers have been used to quickly guide patients to appropriate care upon admission. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multimarker approach for early risk stratification of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Emergency Department. It aimed to determine if a combined biomarker panel could better predict COVID-19 severity than single biomarkers, aiding in clinical decision-making and resource management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 265 patients with suspected COVID-19 admitted to the Emergency Department at the University Hospital Tor Vergata in Rome from April to December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR swabs. Clinical features and biomarker levels were analyzed, and mortality prediction was assessed using ROC curve analysis to determine the AUC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results demonstrated that the predictive power for mortality increased when multiple biomarkers were considered together. The most comprehensive panel, combining MR-proADM, CRP, D-dimer, LDH, and CT score, achieved the highest accuracy (AUC: 0.866), outperforming any individual marker.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Combining multiple biomarkers improved the prediction of disease severity over individual biomarkers. These findings suggest that using a comprehensive biomarker panel can more accurately predict SARS-CoV-2 severity, supporting its potential utility for early risk stratification in various emergency settings and aiding in the efficient allocation of healthcare resources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"39 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimarker Approach: An Effective Tool in the Risk Stratification of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department\",\"authors\":\"Marilena Minieri,&nbsp;Carla Prezioso,&nbsp;Dolores Limongi,&nbsp;Vito N. Di Lecce,&nbsp;Maria Stella Lia,&nbsp;Alessandro Terrinoni,&nbsp;Alfredo Giovannelli,&nbsp;Gianluigi Ferrazza,&nbsp;Cartesio D'Agostini,&nbsp;Sergio Bernardini,&nbsp;Jacopo M. Legramante\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcla.70084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of biomarkers in emergency room decision-making has significantly increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to urgent clinical needs. SARS-CoV-2 infection presents a spectrum of symptoms, from asymptomatic cases to severe pneumonia with respiratory failure. During the pandemic, various prognostic tools and biomarkers have been used to quickly guide patients to appropriate care upon admission. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multimarker approach for early risk stratification of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Emergency Department. It aimed to determine if a combined biomarker panel could better predict COVID-19 severity than single biomarkers, aiding in clinical decision-making and resource management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 265 patients with suspected COVID-19 admitted to the Emergency Department at the University Hospital Tor Vergata in Rome from April to December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR swabs. Clinical features and biomarker levels were analyzed, and mortality prediction was assessed using ROC curve analysis to determine the AUC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results demonstrated that the predictive power for mortality increased when multiple biomarkers were considered together. The most comprehensive panel, combining MR-proADM, CRP, D-dimer, LDH, and CT score, achieved the highest accuracy (AUC: 0.866), outperforming any individual marker.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Combining multiple biomarkers improved the prediction of disease severity over individual biomarkers. These findings suggest that using a comprehensive biomarker panel can more accurately predict SARS-CoV-2 severity, supporting its potential utility for early risk stratification in various emergency settings and aiding in the efficient allocation of healthcare resources.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"volume\":\"39 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.70084\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.70084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.70084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于迫切的临床需求,生物标志物在急诊室决策中的使用显著增加,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间。SARS-CoV-2感染呈现一系列症状,从无症状病例到伴有呼吸衰竭的严重肺炎。在大流行期间,已使用各种预后工具和生物标志物来快速指导患者在入院时获得适当的护理。本研究评估了多标志物方法在急诊科确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染患者早期风险分层中的有效性。该研究旨在确定联合生物标志物小组是否能比单一生物标志物更好地预测COVID-19的严重程度,从而帮助临床决策和资源管理。方法:本回顾性观察性研究分析了2020年4月至12月在罗马托尔维加塔大学医院急诊科收治的265例疑似COVID-19患者的数据。RT-PCR拭子证实SARS-CoV-2感染。分析临床特征和生物标志物水平,并采用ROC曲线分析评估死亡率预测,确定AUC。结果:结果表明,当多种生物标志物一起考虑时,死亡率的预测能力增加。结合MR-proADM、CRP、d -二聚体、LDH和CT评分的最全面的评估小组达到了最高的准确性(AUC: 0.866),优于任何单个指标。结论:与单个生物标志物相比,联合使用多种生物标志物可改善疾病严重程度的预测。这些发现表明,使用综合生物标志物面板可以更准确地预测SARS-CoV-2的严重程度,支持其在各种紧急情况下早期风险分层的潜在效用,并有助于有效分配医疗资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multimarker Approach: An Effective Tool in the Risk Stratification of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department

Multimarker Approach: An Effective Tool in the Risk Stratification of Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department

Background

The use of biomarkers in emergency room decision-making has significantly increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to urgent clinical needs. SARS-CoV-2 infection presents a spectrum of symptoms, from asymptomatic cases to severe pneumonia with respiratory failure. During the pandemic, various prognostic tools and biomarkers have been used to quickly guide patients to appropriate care upon admission. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multimarker approach for early risk stratification of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Emergency Department. It aimed to determine if a combined biomarker panel could better predict COVID-19 severity than single biomarkers, aiding in clinical decision-making and resource management.

Methods

This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 265 patients with suspected COVID-19 admitted to the Emergency Department at the University Hospital Tor Vergata in Rome from April to December 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR swabs. Clinical features and biomarker levels were analyzed, and mortality prediction was assessed using ROC curve analysis to determine the AUC.

Results

Results demonstrated that the predictive power for mortality increased when multiple biomarkers were considered together. The most comprehensive panel, combining MR-proADM, CRP, D-dimer, LDH, and CT score, achieved the highest accuracy (AUC: 0.866), outperforming any individual marker.

Conclusion

Combining multiple biomarkers improved the prediction of disease severity over individual biomarkers. These findings suggest that using a comprehensive biomarker panel can more accurately predict SARS-CoV-2 severity, supporting its potential utility for early risk stratification in various emergency settings and aiding in the efficient allocation of healthcare resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信