Lauren Milgram, Teresa Toranzo, Rachel E Mathews, Adam B Lewin
{"title":"强迫症及相关疾病患者的治疗障碍和治疗方式偏好。","authors":"Lauren Milgram, Teresa Toranzo, Rachel E Mathews, Adam B Lewin","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Facing numerous barriers to care, most individuals experiencing symptoms of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders do not receive evidence-based treatment. While much existing literature has identified barriers to mental health treatment broadly, little empirical work has assessed barriers specifically within a sample of individuals with obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, whose identified barriers and treatment preferences may differ from other clinical samples. In particular, this information is lacking for pediatric samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study examined treatment barriers and modality preferences among individuals (N = 216; 48 adults and 168 parents of youth) receiving telehealth-based treatment for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants endorsed an array of barriers to treatment, including barriers to both in-person and telehealth treatment modalities. Time and distance to in-person treatment were the most influential barriers associated with a preference for telehealth treatment, while difficulty building rapport with the clinician via telehealth and telehealth feeling impersonal were the most influential barriers associated with a preference for in-person treatment. Participants who indicated that clinician expertise was important in their decision-making were more likely to prefer in-person treatment, while participants who indicated that cost of treatment was important in their decision-making were more likely to prefer telehealth treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings can inform future efforts to increase the accessibility and uptake of evidence-based interventions for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Barriers and Modality Preferences Among Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Milgram, Teresa Toranzo, Rachel E Mathews, Adam B Lewin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Facing numerous barriers to care, most individuals experiencing symptoms of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders do not receive evidence-based treatment. While much existing literature has identified barriers to mental health treatment broadly, little empirical work has assessed barriers specifically within a sample of individuals with obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, whose identified barriers and treatment preferences may differ from other clinical samples. In particular, this information is lacking for pediatric samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study examined treatment barriers and modality preferences among individuals (N = 216; 48 adults and 168 parents of youth) receiving telehealth-based treatment for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants endorsed an array of barriers to treatment, including barriers to both in-person and telehealth treatment modalities. Time and distance to in-person treatment were the most influential barriers associated with a preference for telehealth treatment, while difficulty building rapport with the clinician via telehealth and telehealth feeling impersonal were the most influential barriers associated with a preference for in-person treatment. Participants who indicated that clinician expertise was important in their decision-making were more likely to prefer in-person treatment, while participants who indicated that cost of treatment was important in their decision-making were more likely to prefer telehealth treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings can inform future efforts to increase the accessibility and uptake of evidence-based interventions for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment Barriers and Modality Preferences Among Individuals With Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.
Objectives: Facing numerous barriers to care, most individuals experiencing symptoms of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders do not receive evidence-based treatment. While much existing literature has identified barriers to mental health treatment broadly, little empirical work has assessed barriers specifically within a sample of individuals with obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, whose identified barriers and treatment preferences may differ from other clinical samples. In particular, this information is lacking for pediatric samples.
Methods: The current study examined treatment barriers and modality preferences among individuals (N = 216; 48 adults and 168 parents of youth) receiving telehealth-based treatment for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.
Results: Participants endorsed an array of barriers to treatment, including barriers to both in-person and telehealth treatment modalities. Time and distance to in-person treatment were the most influential barriers associated with a preference for telehealth treatment, while difficulty building rapport with the clinician via telehealth and telehealth feeling impersonal were the most influential barriers associated with a preference for in-person treatment. Participants who indicated that clinician expertise was important in their decision-making were more likely to prefer in-person treatment, while participants who indicated that cost of treatment was important in their decision-making were more likely to prefer telehealth treatment.
Conclusion: Findings can inform future efforts to increase the accessibility and uptake of evidence-based interventions for obsessive-compulsive and related disorders.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.