Flavio Iovoli, Julian A Rubel, Tobias Steinbrenner, Ruben Lauterbach
{"title":"人际关系问题及其心理健康相关性:元分析综述。","authors":"Flavio Iovoli, Julian A Rubel, Tobias Steinbrenner, Ruben Lauterbach","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpersonal relationships have long been considered fundamental to understanding mental health and psychological functioning. Among various aspects of these relationships, interpersonal problems seem particularly significant in relation to mental health. This meta-analytic review aims to summarize the associations between interpersonal problems and multiple domains of mental health based on naturalistic, observational data from both clinical and nonclinical populations. Focusing on studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), we examined the cross-sectional associations between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress, depressive symptoms, symptoms of anxiety, positive and negative emotions, well-being, and perceived stress. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to account for the nested data structure, and moderator analyses examined differences between clinical and nonclinical samples. Across all domains, 120 effect sizes from 66 studies were included. Significant positive correlations emerged between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress (r = 0.565, p < 0.001), depression (r = 0.473, p < 0.001), anxiety (r = 0.454, p < 0.001), and negative emotions (r = 0.486, p < 0.001). In contrast, significant negative correlations were found with positive emotions (r = -0.224, p = 0.010) and well-being (r = -0.372, p = 0.004). There were too few studies available to meta-analyze perceived stress. Clinical status did not significantly moderate these associations, suggesting that the observed associations are relatively consistent across populations. These findings underscore the relevance of interpersonal problems, as measured by the IIP, for understanding mental health and provide evidence-based estimates of these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpersonal Problems and Their Mental Health Correlates: A Meta-Analytic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Flavio Iovoli, Julian A Rubel, Tobias Steinbrenner, Ruben Lauterbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interpersonal relationships have long been considered fundamental to understanding mental health and psychological functioning. Among various aspects of these relationships, interpersonal problems seem particularly significant in relation to mental health. This meta-analytic review aims to summarize the associations between interpersonal problems and multiple domains of mental health based on naturalistic, observational data from both clinical and nonclinical populations. Focusing on studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), we examined the cross-sectional associations between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress, depressive symptoms, symptoms of anxiety, positive and negative emotions, well-being, and perceived stress. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to account for the nested data structure, and moderator analyses examined differences between clinical and nonclinical samples. Across all domains, 120 effect sizes from 66 studies were included. Significant positive correlations emerged between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress (r = 0.565, p < 0.001), depression (r = 0.473, p < 0.001), anxiety (r = 0.454, p < 0.001), and negative emotions (r = 0.486, p < 0.001). In contrast, significant negative correlations were found with positive emotions (r = -0.224, p = 0.010) and well-being (r = -0.372, p = 0.004). There were too few studies available to meta-analyze perceived stress. Clinical status did not significantly moderate these associations, suggesting that the observed associations are relatively consistent across populations. These findings underscore the relevance of interpersonal problems, as measured by the IIP, for understanding mental health and provide evidence-based estimates of these associations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期以来,人际关系一直被认为是理解心理健康和心理功能的基础。在这些关系的各个方面中,人际关系问题似乎与心理健康有关。本荟萃分析综述旨在基于临床和非临床人群的自然观察数据,总结人际关系问题与心理健康多个领域之间的联系。以人际关系问题量表(IIP)为研究重点,研究了人际关系问题与一般心理困扰、抑郁症状、焦虑症状、积极和消极情绪、幸福感和感知压力之间的横断面关联。采用三级元分析模型来解释嵌套的数据结构,调节分析检查了临床和非临床样本之间的差异。在所有领域,包括66项研究的120个效应值。人际关系问题与一般心理困扰呈显著正相关(r = 0.565, p
Interpersonal Problems and Their Mental Health Correlates: A Meta-Analytic Review.
Interpersonal relationships have long been considered fundamental to understanding mental health and psychological functioning. Among various aspects of these relationships, interpersonal problems seem particularly significant in relation to mental health. This meta-analytic review aims to summarize the associations between interpersonal problems and multiple domains of mental health based on naturalistic, observational data from both clinical and nonclinical populations. Focusing on studies using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), we examined the cross-sectional associations between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress, depressive symptoms, symptoms of anxiety, positive and negative emotions, well-being, and perceived stress. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to account for the nested data structure, and moderator analyses examined differences between clinical and nonclinical samples. Across all domains, 120 effect sizes from 66 studies were included. Significant positive correlations emerged between interpersonal problems and general psychological distress (r = 0.565, p < 0.001), depression (r = 0.473, p < 0.001), anxiety (r = 0.454, p < 0.001), and negative emotions (r = 0.486, p < 0.001). In contrast, significant negative correlations were found with positive emotions (r = -0.224, p = 0.010) and well-being (r = -0.372, p = 0.004). There were too few studies available to meta-analyze perceived stress. Clinical status did not significantly moderate these associations, suggesting that the observed associations are relatively consistent across populations. These findings underscore the relevance of interpersonal problems, as measured by the IIP, for understanding mental health and provide evidence-based estimates of these associations.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.