助听器使用对老年性耳聋患者认知技能和语言流畅性的影响。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gokhan Toptas, Sumeyra Doluoglu, Erhan Arslan, Serap Er, Dilara Soylemez, Muharrem Dagli
{"title":"助听器使用对老年性耳聋患者认知技能和语言流畅性的影响。","authors":"Gokhan Toptas, Sumeyra Doluoglu, Erhan Arslan, Serap Er, Dilara Soylemez, Muharrem Dagli","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04036-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hearing aids are used to mitigate the adverse effects of hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the relationship between hearing ability, cognitive skills, and verbal fluency before and after hearing aid use in individuals with presbycusis, and to understand the effect of unilateral or bilateral hearing aid use on these possible changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 39 patients with presbycusis were included in the study. Patients who benefited from unilateral or bilateral hearing aids were assigned to Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All patients underwent one cognitive test (standardized mini-mental state examination [SMMSE]) and two separate verbal fluency tests (phonemic fluency test [PFT] and semantic fluency test [SFT]), both before and after at least 6 months of hearing aid use. SMMSE, PFT, and SFT scores before and after device use and the intergroup percentage change in these scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly higher SMMSE and PFT scores after hearing aid use compared to those before (p < 0.05). No intergroup differences were found when comparing the percentage change in SMMSE and PFT scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant improvement in cognitive and verbal fluency tests after hearing aid use compared to before. However, the use of unilateral or bilateral devices did not influence this improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first prospective study in the literature to investigate the effect of unilateral and bilateral hearing aid use on cognitive and verbal fluency tests in patients with presbycusis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of hearing aid use on cognitive skills and verbal fluency in patients with presbycusis.\",\"authors\":\"Gokhan Toptas, Sumeyra Doluoglu, Erhan Arslan, Serap Er, Dilara Soylemez, Muharrem Dagli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11845-025-04036-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hearing aids are used to mitigate the adverse effects of hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the relationship between hearing ability, cognitive skills, and verbal fluency before and after hearing aid use in individuals with presbycusis, and to understand the effect of unilateral or bilateral hearing aid use on these possible changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 39 patients with presbycusis were included in the study. Patients who benefited from unilateral or bilateral hearing aids were assigned to Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All patients underwent one cognitive test (standardized mini-mental state examination [SMMSE]) and two separate verbal fluency tests (phonemic fluency test [PFT] and semantic fluency test [SFT]), both before and after at least 6 months of hearing aid use. SMMSE, PFT, and SFT scores before and after device use and the intergroup percentage change in these scores were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly higher SMMSE and PFT scores after hearing aid use compared to those before (p < 0.05). No intergroup differences were found when comparing the percentage change in SMMSE and PFT scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant improvement in cognitive and verbal fluency tests after hearing aid use compared to before. However, the use of unilateral or bilateral devices did not influence this improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first prospective study in the literature to investigate the effect of unilateral and bilateral hearing aid use on cognitive and verbal fluency tests in patients with presbycusis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04036-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04036-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:助听器用于减轻听力损失的不良影响。目的:探讨老年性耳聋患者使用助听器前后听力、认知技能和语言流利度的关系,并了解单侧或双侧助听器使用对这些可能的变化的影响。方法:选取39例老年性耳聋患者作为研究对象。使用单侧或双侧助听器的患者分别被分配到第1组和第2组。所有患者在使用助听器至少6个月之前和之后都进行了一次认知测试(标准化迷你精神状态检查[SMMSE])和两次单独的语言流畅性测试(音位流畅性测试[PFT]和语义流畅性测试[SFT])。比较器械使用前后的SMMSE、PFT和SFT评分以及这些评分的组间百分比变化。结果:1、2组助听器使用后的SMMSE、PFT评分均显著高于助听器使用前(p < 0.05)。与使用助听器之前相比,使用助听器后认知和语言流畅性测试有显著改善。然而,单侧或双侧装置的使用对这种改善没有影响。结论:本研究是文献中第一个探讨单侧和双侧助听器使用对老年性耳聋患者认知和语言流畅性测试影响的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of hearing aid use on cognitive skills and verbal fluency in patients with presbycusis.

Background: Hearing aids are used to mitigate the adverse effects of hearing loss.

Aims: To investigate the relationship between hearing ability, cognitive skills, and verbal fluency before and after hearing aid use in individuals with presbycusis, and to understand the effect of unilateral or bilateral hearing aid use on these possible changes.

Methods: A total of 39 patients with presbycusis were included in the study. Patients who benefited from unilateral or bilateral hearing aids were assigned to Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All patients underwent one cognitive test (standardized mini-mental state examination [SMMSE]) and two separate verbal fluency tests (phonemic fluency test [PFT] and semantic fluency test [SFT]), both before and after at least 6 months of hearing aid use. SMMSE, PFT, and SFT scores before and after device use and the intergroup percentage change in these scores were compared.

Results: Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly higher SMMSE and PFT scores after hearing aid use compared to those before (p < 0.05). No intergroup differences were found when comparing the percentage change in SMMSE and PFT scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant improvement in cognitive and verbal fluency tests after hearing aid use compared to before. However, the use of unilateral or bilateral devices did not influence this improvement.

Conclusions: This study is the first prospective study in the literature to investigate the effect of unilateral and bilateral hearing aid use on cognitive and verbal fluency tests in patients with presbycusis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信