Carmen Balian, Jack E Teplitsky, Wissam Nassrallah, Aman Sayal, Rosa Braga-Mele, Sherif El-Defrawy, Amrit S Rai, John Lloyd, Amandeep S Rai
{"title":"记录即时序贯双侧白内障手术中第一眼与第二眼患者的主观体验。","authors":"Carmen Balian, Jack E Teplitsky, Wissam Nassrallah, Aman Sayal, Rosa Braga-Mele, Sherif El-Defrawy, Amrit S Rai, John Lloyd, Amandeep S Rai","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery patients tend to have subjectively inferior experiences during the second eye surgery than the first eye surgery. Our study investigated if this phenomenon would still occur during immediate sequential bilateral cataract (ISBCS) as both operations are performed within the same surgical visit.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>To investigate this, we enrolled patients undergoing ISBCS at a multi-surgeon ophthalmic surgical center into our study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Our study used a survey-based prospective design to measure the experience of these patients with ISBCS. The first eye which underwent surgery was randomized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients of the center undergoing routine cataract surgery who enrolled in the study completed a questionnaire immediately after surgery to describe their surgical experience for each eye. Survey questions measured patient pain, discomfort or pressure, comfort, relaxation, estimated length of surgery and predicted visual outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient reported level of pain during the second eye surgery was significantly greater than for the first eye (p<0.001). Furthermore, the order of surgery was found to be a strong predictor of patient reported pain (p<0.001), more so than surgical length (p<0.008), additional anesthesia (p<0.35), patient age (p<0.44) or patient sex (p<0.88). Overall, surgery during the first eye was reported as more comfortable (p<0.001) and shorter in duration (p<0.001) while discomfort and pressure were reported as worse for the second eye (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding differential experiences between eyes can help surgeons when counselling patients regarding expectations for ISBCS and related visual outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documenting the subjective patient experience of first versus second eye during immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Balian, Jack E Teplitsky, Wissam Nassrallah, Aman Sayal, Rosa Braga-Mele, Sherif El-Defrawy, Amrit S Rai, John Lloyd, Amandeep S Rai\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery patients tend to have subjectively inferior experiences during the second eye surgery than the first eye surgery. Our study investigated if this phenomenon would still occur during immediate sequential bilateral cataract (ISBCS) as both operations are performed within the same surgical visit.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>To investigate this, we enrolled patients undergoing ISBCS at a multi-surgeon ophthalmic surgical center into our study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Our study used a survey-based prospective design to measure the experience of these patients with ISBCS. The first eye which underwent surgery was randomized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients of the center undergoing routine cataract surgery who enrolled in the study completed a questionnaire immediately after surgery to describe their surgical experience for each eye. Survey questions measured patient pain, discomfort or pressure, comfort, relaxation, estimated length of surgery and predicted visual outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient reported level of pain during the second eye surgery was significantly greater than for the first eye (p<0.001). Furthermore, the order of surgery was found to be a strong predictor of patient reported pain (p<0.001), more so than surgical length (p<0.008), additional anesthesia (p<0.35), patient age (p<0.44) or patient sex (p<0.88). Overall, surgery during the first eye was reported as more comfortable (p<0.001) and shorter in duration (p<0.001) while discomfort and pressure were reported as worse for the second eye (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding differential experiences between eyes can help surgeons when counselling patients regarding expectations for ISBCS and related visual outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Documenting the subjective patient experience of first versus second eye during immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.
Purpose: During delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery patients tend to have subjectively inferior experiences during the second eye surgery than the first eye surgery. Our study investigated if this phenomenon would still occur during immediate sequential bilateral cataract (ISBCS) as both operations are performed within the same surgical visit.
Setting: To investigate this, we enrolled patients undergoing ISBCS at a multi-surgeon ophthalmic surgical center into our study.
Design: Our study used a survey-based prospective design to measure the experience of these patients with ISBCS. The first eye which underwent surgery was randomized.
Methods: Patients of the center undergoing routine cataract surgery who enrolled in the study completed a questionnaire immediately after surgery to describe their surgical experience for each eye. Survey questions measured patient pain, discomfort or pressure, comfort, relaxation, estimated length of surgery and predicted visual outcome.
Results: Patient reported level of pain during the second eye surgery was significantly greater than for the first eye (p<0.001). Furthermore, the order of surgery was found to be a strong predictor of patient reported pain (p<0.001), more so than surgical length (p<0.008), additional anesthesia (p<0.35), patient age (p<0.44) or patient sex (p<0.88). Overall, surgery during the first eye was reported as more comfortable (p<0.001) and shorter in duration (p<0.001) while discomfort and pressure were reported as worse for the second eye (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Understanding differential experiences between eyes can help surgeons when counselling patients regarding expectations for ISBCS and related visual outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS).
JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.