Juan Carlos Perdomo-Lizárraga, Andrés Combalia, Jenaro A Fernández-Valencia, Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor, Alfonso Alías, Laura Morata, Álex Soriano, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud
{"title":"非计划第二次清创，抗生素和种植体保留（DAIR）程序在急性术后假体关节感染中的临床效果。","authors":"Juan Carlos Perdomo-Lizárraga, Andrés Combalia, Jenaro A Fernández-Valencia, Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor, Alfonso Alías, Laura Morata, Álex Soriano, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06617-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a commonly employed strategy for managing acute postoperative prosthetic joint infections (PJI) while preserving the prosthesis. However, the clinical value of an unplanned second DAIR - performed due to inadequate infection control - remains controversial and is often considered a potential treatment failure. This study aimed to compare the two year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a single DAIR versus those requiring an unplanned second DAIR for acute postoperative PJI of the hip or knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients treated with DAIR for acute postoperative PJI between January 1999 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups: those managed with a single DAIR (DAIR-1 group) and those requiring an unplanned second DAIR within 12 weeks (DAIR-2 group). Treatment failure was defined as any of the following: further debridement beyond 12 weeks, revision surgery with prosthesis removal, initiation of long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, or PJI-related mortality. Patients lost to follow-up before two years were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 318 patients were included, with 292 in the DAIR-1 group and 26 in the DAIR-2 group. Mean follow-up was 89.4 months. At two years, revision surgery was required in 19.2% (56/292) of DAIR-1 patients and 42.3% (11/26) of DAIR-2 patients (p = 0.005). Overall failure-free survival at two years was observed in 75.3% (220/292) of DAIR-1 patients compared to 46.2% (12/26) of those in the DAIR-2 group (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unplanned second DAIR procedures are associated with significantly lower success rates at two years. Nonetheless, given that nearly half of these patients remained free of failure, a second DAIR may still be a reasonable therapeutic option in selected cases, provided that the increased risk of a poorer prognosis is taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"2385-2392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of an unplanned second debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in acute postoperative prosthetic joint infections.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Perdomo-Lizárraga, Andrés Combalia, Jenaro A Fernández-Valencia, Juan Carlos Martínez-Pastor, Alfonso Alías, Laura Morata, Álex Soriano, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-025-06617-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a commonly employed strategy for managing acute postoperative prosthetic joint infections (PJI) while preserving the prosthesis. However, the clinical value of an unplanned second DAIR - performed due to inadequate infection control - remains controversial and is often considered a potential treatment failure. This study aimed to compare the two year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a single DAIR versus those requiring an unplanned second DAIR for acute postoperative PJI of the hip or knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients treated with DAIR for acute postoperative PJI between January 1999 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups: those managed with a single DAIR (DAIR-1 group) and those requiring an unplanned second DAIR within 12 weeks (DAIR-2 group). Treatment failure was defined as any of the following: further debridement beyond 12 weeks, revision surgery with prosthesis removal, initiation of long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, or PJI-related mortality. Patients lost to follow-up before two years were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 318 patients were included, with 292 in the DAIR-1 group and 26 in the DAIR-2 group. Mean follow-up was 89.4 months. At two years, revision surgery was required in 19.2% (56/292) of DAIR-1 patients and 42.3% (11/26) of DAIR-2 patients (p = 0.005). Overall failure-free survival at two years was observed in 75.3% (220/292) of DAIR-1 patients compared to 46.2% (12/26) of those in the DAIR-2 group (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unplanned second DAIR procedures are associated with significantly lower success rates at two years. Nonetheless, given that nearly half of these patients remained free of failure, a second DAIR may still be a reasonable therapeutic option in selected cases, provided that the increased risk of a poorer prognosis is taken into account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2385-2392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488757/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06617-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06617-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical outcomes of an unplanned second debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in acute postoperative prosthetic joint infections.
Introduction: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a commonly employed strategy for managing acute postoperative prosthetic joint infections (PJI) while preserving the prosthesis. However, the clinical value of an unplanned second DAIR - performed due to inadequate infection control - remains controversial and is often considered a potential treatment failure. This study aimed to compare the two year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a single DAIR versus those requiring an unplanned second DAIR for acute postoperative PJI of the hip or knee.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients treated with DAIR for acute postoperative PJI between January 1999 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups: those managed with a single DAIR (DAIR-1 group) and those requiring an unplanned second DAIR within 12 weeks (DAIR-2 group). Treatment failure was defined as any of the following: further debridement beyond 12 weeks, revision surgery with prosthesis removal, initiation of long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, or PJI-related mortality. Patients lost to follow-up before two years were excluded.
Results: A total of 318 patients were included, with 292 in the DAIR-1 group and 26 in the DAIR-2 group. Mean follow-up was 89.4 months. At two years, revision surgery was required in 19.2% (56/292) of DAIR-1 patients and 42.3% (11/26) of DAIR-2 patients (p = 0.005). Overall failure-free survival at two years was observed in 75.3% (220/292) of DAIR-1 patients compared to 46.2% (12/26) of those in the DAIR-2 group (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Unplanned second DAIR procedures are associated with significantly lower success rates at two years. Nonetheless, given that nearly half of these patients remained free of failure, a second DAIR may still be a reasonable therapeutic option in selected cases, provided that the increased risk of a poorer prognosis is taken into account.
期刊介绍：
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
