院内脓毒症:如何调和立即广谱治疗与最小的生态压力和医疗保健费用。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Current Opinion in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001299
Marta Ulldemolins, Josep Mensa, Alex Soriano
{"title":"院内脓毒症:如何调和立即广谱治疗与最小的生态压力和医疗保健费用。","authors":"Marta Ulldemolins, Josep Mensa, Alex Soriano","doi":"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To investigate the potential association between colonization of the rectal and oropharyngeal mucosa by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli and the subsequent nosocomial sepsis due to the same pathogen in order to provide a rational basis for early de-escalation when standard clinical samples are negative.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Compelling metagenomic data shows that profound shifts in gut and respiratory microbiota occur over time in the context of antibiotic therapy, critical illness and intubation leading to predominance of P. aeruginosa and MDR-Enterobacterales. Detection of these microorganisms through culture or molecular methods in mucosal swab samples is associated with a clinically relevant risk of subsequent nosocomial sepsis caused by the same pathogens. Conversely, their absence confers a high negative predictive value (NPV, >95%) for infection due to these microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In settings with a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in sepsis is often necessary. However, in culture-negative sepsis, these agents are frequently continued to the full treatment duration, entailing potential collateral damage and a significant economic burden. In this context, clinical evidence suggests that failure to detect P. aeruginosa or MDR-Enterobacterales carries a high NPV for subsequent infection by these microorganisms. We propose an algorithm that ensures adequate empirical coverage while enabling antibiotic de-escalation in culture-negative cases based on colonization status.</p>","PeriodicalId":10851,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"513-519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nosocomial sepsis: how to reconcile immediate broad-spectrum therapy with minimal ecological pressure and healthcare cost.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Ulldemolins, Josep Mensa, Alex Soriano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCC.0000000000001299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To investigate the potential association between colonization of the rectal and oropharyngeal mucosa by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli and the subsequent nosocomial sepsis due to the same pathogen in order to provide a rational basis for early de-escalation when standard clinical samples are negative.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Compelling metagenomic data shows that profound shifts in gut and respiratory microbiota occur over time in the context of antibiotic therapy, critical illness and intubation leading to predominance of P. aeruginosa and MDR-Enterobacterales. Detection of these microorganisms through culture or molecular methods in mucosal swab samples is associated with a clinically relevant risk of subsequent nosocomial sepsis caused by the same pathogens. Conversely, their absence confers a high negative predictive value (NPV, >95%) for infection due to these microorganisms.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In settings with a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in sepsis is often necessary. However, in culture-negative sepsis, these agents are frequently continued to the full treatment duration, entailing potential collateral damage and a significant economic burden. In this context, clinical evidence suggests that failure to detect P. aeruginosa or MDR-Enterobacterales carries a high NPV for subsequent infection by these microorganisms. We propose an algorithm that ensures adequate empirical coverage while enabling antibiotic de-escalation in culture-negative cases based on colonization status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"513-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:探讨多药耐药(MDR)革兰氏阴性杆菌在直肠和口咽粘膜的定植与随后由同一病原体引起的院内败血症之间的潜在关系,以便在标准临床样品阴性时为早期降级提供合理依据。最近发现:令人信服的宏基因组数据显示,在抗生素治疗、危重疾病和插管的背景下,肠道和呼吸微生物群随着时间的推移发生了深刻的变化,导致铜绿假单胞菌和耐多药肠杆菌占主导地位。通过培养或分子方法在粘膜拭子样本中检测这些微生物与由相同病原体引起的后续医院败血症的临床相关风险相关。相反,它们的缺失为这些微生物引起的感染提供了很高的阴性预测值(NPV,约为95%)。摘要:在抗菌素耐药性高流行的环境中,在脓毒症中经验使用广谱抗生素通常是必要的。然而,在培养阴性脓毒症中,这些药物经常持续到整个治疗期间,导致潜在的附带损害和重大的经济负担。在这种情况下,临床证据表明,未能检测到铜绿假单胞菌或耐多药肠杆菌会导致这些微生物随后感染的高净pv。我们提出了一种算法,以确保充分的经验覆盖,同时使基于定植状态的培养阴性病例的抗生素降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nosocomial sepsis: how to reconcile immediate broad-spectrum therapy with minimal ecological pressure and healthcare cost.

Purpose of review: To investigate the potential association between colonization of the rectal and oropharyngeal mucosa by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli and the subsequent nosocomial sepsis due to the same pathogen in order to provide a rational basis for early de-escalation when standard clinical samples are negative.

Recent findings: Compelling metagenomic data shows that profound shifts in gut and respiratory microbiota occur over time in the context of antibiotic therapy, critical illness and intubation leading to predominance of P. aeruginosa and MDR-Enterobacterales. Detection of these microorganisms through culture or molecular methods in mucosal swab samples is associated with a clinically relevant risk of subsequent nosocomial sepsis caused by the same pathogens. Conversely, their absence confers a high negative predictive value (NPV, >95%) for infection due to these microorganisms.

Summary: In settings with a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in sepsis is often necessary. However, in culture-negative sepsis, these agents are frequently continued to the full treatment duration, entailing potential collateral damage and a significant economic burden. In this context, clinical evidence suggests that failure to detect P. aeruginosa or MDR-Enterobacterales carries a high NPV for subsequent infection by these microorganisms. We propose an algorithm that ensures adequate empirical coverage while enabling antibiotic de-escalation in culture-negative cases based on colonization status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Critical Care delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in critical care from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring thirteen key topics – including the respiratory system, neuroscience, trauma and infectious diseases – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信